this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2026
117 points (96.1% liked)

Europe

10644 readers
1453 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] baconmonsta@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 78 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I thought the super advanced American military had completely destroyed the formerly modern Iranian military?

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

They destroyed them so much, they looped around and are now bigger than before

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 27 points 3 days ago

At least twice, according to official US bragging.

[–] arrrse@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago

Its ok for UK to come and claim glory for the already won war. Thats how great guy dolan is

[–] bossito@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

Nah, we need them to defend Greenland, sorry Donald.

[–] 73ms@sopuli.xyz 14 points 2 days ago

I thought he had already won and didn't need the UK's aircraft carriers.

[–] TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id 52 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] madde@feddit.org 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Just send Barron. Then we'll consider. Actually we won't, get fucked anyway but send Barron while you're at it.

[–] TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I can only assume you've left out 'to the sun'.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 3 points 2 days ago

Give him a bb gun and cardboard armor, then send him to the front lines.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 44 points 3 days ago (1 children)

what a deeply stupid person… and that's after being a rapist pedophile

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago (4 children)

You don't get it I think. He's playing 5d chess. But here's the plan in full.

  1. Insult allies and friends.

  2. ???

  3. Win.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 11 points 3 days ago

He might be using 5D chess pieces, but I think he's using them wrong. As in chewing on them or inserting them in places.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 7 points 3 days ago

He's not even playing 2D chess.

Cheese is... Chess is.. everybody knows and people always tell me you know how cheese is woke. The bigly strong King moves once but the queen, I always swap them, people just let you do it, I swap the queen. My king goes anywhere. It's the best.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

that's too complicated for my brain

[–] plyth@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He’s playing 5d chess.

Not him, but the elite who makes you believe that he is playing.

The billionaires and politicians could do an impeachment if Trump didn't make sense for them.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I have seen enough of those grovelling and kissing ass to pretend they are all "in control"

Must billinaires today are just nepo babies… ascribing superior smarts to them is buying into the myth tht money = smarts

[–] plyth@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Even if most are nepo babies, who else but them is keeping Trump in power?

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I do not disagree they are keeping him in power… I disagree they have a master 5D chess plan and are in control… which speaks badly about they capacity considering trump is easier to manipulate than an eager dog in front of a ball

[–] plyth@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Unless Trump is part of the plan. Him being a "Russian asset" allows each US citizen to disassociate and to not feel responsible. People shrug everything off while nobody asks who is in power if Trump is so incompetent. To me that looks like a brilliant plan.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

and I think my cat loves me because she is constantly rubbing against my leg… but maybe she just loves the treats

[–] Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"We have already destroyed 100% of Iran’s Military capability, but it’s easy for them to send a drone or two, drop a mine, or deliver a close range missile somewhere along, or in, this Waterway, no matter how badly defeated they are."

So where are these drone and missiles coming from if it's all 100% destroyed?

[–] fierysparrow89@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Wait, the US Navy needs help defending 2 shipping lanes from an enemy with 100% destroyed military capabilities? Is that it?

The US lifted oil sanctions on Russia. They aren't being an ally to us, and we have no reason to send our people and resources to deal with their nonsense. Focus on phasing out fossil fuels as soon as possible instead. (This should have been done decades ago, but the second best time is now.)

[–] Major_Tsiom@fedia.io 30 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Didn’t he just tell the UK he didn’t need their help? He already β€œwon the war” or some shit like that? I’d tell him to fuck off. In those exact words.

"I did an oopsy. Please come and clean it up for me." - Trump

[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 23 points 3 days ago

With not even a concept of a plan, Trump shits his pants and then asks others to come clean his pants.

[–] Late-Boomer-57@piefed.ca 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Um,...no. Thanks anyway, bro.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If only Keir Starmer were equipped to think of this retort. We'll see what he does.

I thought he's been rather clear on this? Has he started to waver?

in other words, he wants to make the problems he created other people's problems

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fucking why? Why would anyone else want to get involved in this war?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Even if you ignore all of the ethical concerns with this war, there's no benefit for any other nation. Hell, the only benefit for the US is as a distraction and it's now become too distracting.

Continuing the war causes oil prices to increase and also affects international trade in general. Why would I as a leader of a European nation want this situation to continue?

I can see how Trump managed to bankrupt a casino now.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtf 18 points 3 days ago

He wants to go from it being "definitely not a war" to "definitely not a world war" because he and his clown car administration fucked around and are now in the process of finding out.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 7 points 2 days ago

The US has the largest naval fleet in the world why can't they do it? anyway I thought Iran's navy had been totally wiped out so what exactly does he need on the nation's warships for?

[–] redditmademedoit@piefed.zip 14 points 3 days ago

Now taking wagers on when Trump will say he doesn't need to aid Nato allies because they didn't send troops to Iran.

[–] KingGordon@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

Bugger off kiddie diddler.

[–] Melchior@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago

This is so insanely stupid. Iran lets out some ships from countries like China and India, which made deals with Iran. So other countries can either transport cargo on those ships or make a deal themself. No reason to risk a warship, which could be used against Russia and valuable air defense needed in Ukraine.

[–] broom@piefed.social 16 points 3 days ago

To save his ass...

[–] domusaltera@piefed.social 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why doesn't he give Churchill a call

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 5 points 3 days ago

Uh, how 'bout No.

Edit: you just know that anyone who comes in, is just going to get blamed by Trump and the Trumpettes for anything that goes wrong - which will be everything.

And that's just if they're lucky. At some point Trump will fuck off and leave them holding the bag - and a bunch of the blame - on occupation-or-evacuation, face some kind of moral depression on rebuilding (you know the US isn't going to do it, those days are over), and also likely terror attacks on their home soil and infrastructure. So yeah - no thanks. We used up whatever goodwill we had in the voluntary military operation department when we invaded Iraq and Afghanistan.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago
[–] negativenull@piefed.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Help us Obi-Wan Keir Starmer! You're our only hope!

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

A unimaginable level of desperation.

[–] notsosure@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

Not by the hair on your chubby chin chin.