this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
478 points (97.2% liked)

You Should Know

45016 readers
2278 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Rule 11- Posts must actually be true: Disiniformation, trolling, and being misleading will not be tolerated. Repeated or egregious attempts will earn you a ban. This also applies to filing reports: If you continually file false reports YOU WILL BE BANNED! We can see who reports what, and shenanigans will not be tolerated. We are not here to ban people who said something you don't like.

If you file a report, include what specific rule is being violated and how.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At least 347 and up to 504 civilians, almost all women, children and elderly men, were murdered by U.S. Army soldiers. Some of the women were gang-raped and their bodies mutilated, and some soldiers mutilated and raped children as young as 12.

only Lieutenant William Calley Jr., the leader of 1st Platoon in C Company, was convicted. He was found guilty of murdering 22 villagers and originally given a life sentence, but served three-and-a-half years under house arrest after his sentence was commuted.

Research has highlighted that the My Lai Massacre was not an isolated war crime. Nick Turse places it within a larger pattern of American atrocities enabled by deliberate policies from commanders, such as "free-fire zones" and "body counts", as well as widespread racism amongst American military personnel. Many other atrocities were also covered up by commanders.

Why you should know about this: It is important to know about history so that we can learn from it, avoid the mistakes and atrocities of the past, and know which institutions have a history of performing atrocities, trying to cover them up, etc. and what that looks like.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 0 points 10 minutes ago

We aren't the ones deciding to go to war and cause a generation of men to have their psychological well-being put through a wood chipper. We don't produce the propaganda that make men willing. We don't make poverty rampant so men get desperate enough to enlist.

It doesn't matter if we learn, plenty of us already know and it doesn't change anything. People like Trump, like Putin, like Netanyahoo, don't care about us or whoever ends up a victim of their ambitions. Putin and Netanyahoo know what their troops do and don't give a fuck, they might even use it to their advantage.

The problem isn't learning from the past, it's that psychopaths are good at gaining power. They know and simply don't care. If voters weren't such ignorant imbeciles, maybe they wouldn't vote for ppl like Trump, but they are, so here we are. If customers weren't such ignorant, weak willed cowards incapable of not buying the new toys, we wouldn't fund the people stealing all the property and making us poorer every generation. We are all victims of the decision-making prowess of the average voter, the average consumer.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 1 points 12 minutes ago
[–] hyperencabulator@lemmy.today 4 points 1 hour ago

Thank you for sharing, I had only heard of it tangentially until a Mr. Beat video on the Vietnam War. There's a lot of fictional media in that time frame that references atrocities like this in that conflict, beyond just Apocalypse Now.

https://youtu.be/LwQRfckSANI

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 28 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The only reason why my Lai is known today is because one helicopter pilot had a conscience and ordered his door gunner to open fire on their own troops if they were to approach another group of Vietnamese civilians that he decided to protect

Had he not, likely nobody would have known what happened

[–] raker@lemmy.world 14 points 2 hours ago

And only because this has gone public, they had to award Hugh Thompson Jr. with the Distinguished Flying Cross. Otherwise military court.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 15 points 3 hours ago

It is important to know this because when the military is turned on you, you should know they’ll obey. If you think there are enough that would so no, you’re wrong.

[–] FundMECFS@piefed.zip 17 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

| Sentence | Life imprisonmentcommuted to three years' house arrest by President Richard Nixon |

Fucking hell Nixon …

“Protect the children and women” Except from my murderous rapist soldiers apparently.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 8 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

The police protect women,

WHICH WOMEN!?

[–] FundMECFS@piefed.zip 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I’m a little confused did I say the police protect women? I don’t think I did. Fuck the police.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 hour ago

it's a quote from a song, sorry. i was in agreement with you

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Nixon is dead, we will never know.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 hours ago

Its not a war, it's a raid.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 28 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

US soldiers also raped thousands of French women during WW2.

[–] toad@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yup. They burned my grandma's city to hide the looting.

[–] Karl@literature.cafe -1 points 33 minutes ago

Did they harm your grandma?

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 19 points 8 hours ago

I've read about this too, and the US blamed the problem on black soldiers. Maybe that's something that deserves its own post?

[–] glitching@lemmy.ml 10 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

them vets are the main foment vector for what we now know as the white supremacy movement. not that the sentiment wasn't prevalent, but it was disjointed groups, churches, cults, klan, militias, prison gangs, etc., each pushing their own thing with only limited local reach.

the influx of large swaths of radicalized and trained MAMs was the igniter. all those power squabbling groups started coming together under one banner and they had a new tool - computers.

early on, they realized you can reach a whole lotta more folks with the new tech than the usual zines and the like. so they formed armored truck robbing gangs, and used the proceeds to buy home computers for establishing a network of BBS all over the country, pushing their shit to previously unreachable corners. I mean, if that's not a michael mann movie, I don't know what is...

for more, kathleen belew - bring the war home, available at anne's site or wherever you pirate your shit.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world -1 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

The issue here is humans. In large groups humans do terrible things. Usually in small group interactions they are pretty decent. It's very odd. But probably the result of evolution. Other branches of "human" that didn't act this way were probably wiped out by those that did.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 2 points 24 minutes ago

Please tell me you're not trying to excuse the rape of civilians as "it's just what humans do".

It has nothing to do with evolution. These were angry men, taking out their frustration and anger of being drafted, watching their friends die for nothing in a jungle, on the local population. Rather than the government that sent them there in the first place.

The source of their anger fueling their ruthlessness is not evolutionary. It's manufactured by the ones that sent them there in the first place.

Neither of which justifies rape or mutilation in any way. But it's why they were capable of doing what they did. Anger and hate.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 10 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

While I understand what you're trying to get at - that humans in a group can do terrible things they wouldn't do alone - what you wrote is simply not true in and of itself - large groups of humans do not necessarily conduct massacres, it's far more of a function of the society and the conditioning of the people - these atrocities were conducted because those in the US military saw the Vietnamese as subhuman, and thus had no empathy for them. The reason they felt that way was because of societal conditioning.

You may be surprised to learn that humans are actually the most co-operative animals on the planet - the scope, scale, and variability of human cooperation greatly exceed that of other animals. Our species is the only one we know of which demonstrates an innate willingness to help others we have nothing in common with.

Some of the greatest accomplishments in human history have been achieved by humans working together to accomplish a larger goal. The ruling class divides and atomizes us to turn us against our best interests and our better natures so that we may be more readily exploited to their benefit.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl -2 points 4 hours ago (5 children)

This is bad. What Japan did to China was worse.

[–] dickalan@lemmy.world 4 points 42 minutes ago

ok are you a three letter operative bro

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 minutes ago

What Japan did to China was worse? Ok. So what? What relevance does that have?

Is that how your approach everything in life? Your mother is raped and mutilated, that's bad, but what Japan did to China was worse. So... stop complaining I guess? (Obvious sarcasm but I genuinely fear you won't catch that)

[–] 0x0@infosec.pub 5 points 1 hour ago

Sure, you should make a thread about that.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 16 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

You can always find something worse. Doesn't make it acceptable.

"I broke my arm! Well a full body burn is worse. Oh, ok, I feel better now."

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 hours ago

"We're not as bad as the worst of the worst" isn't the gotcha you seem to think it is.

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 33 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 46 minutes ago) (1 children)

That's just one village.

"According to the Information Bureau of the Provisional Revolutionary Government of South Vietnam (PRG), a shadow government formed by North Vietnam in 1969, between April 1968 and the end of 1970 American ground troops killed about 6,500 civilians in the course of twenty-one operations either on their own or alongside their allies. "

"Tiger Force, a reconnaissance unit of the 101st Airborne Division, probably murdered hundreds of civilians during a 6-month period in 1967"

and from bombing:

"Estimates for the number of North Vietnamese civilian deaths resulting from U.S. bombing range from 30,000 to 65,000.[35][4] Higher estimates place the number of civilian deaths caused by American bombing of North Vietnam in Operation Rolling Thunder at 182,000.[36] American bombing in Cambodia is estimated to have killed between 30,000 and 150,000 civilians and combatants."

Edit: I haven't done extensive research and as was pointed out the actual numbers might be much higher, and my figures don't include deaths and damage from Agent Orange chemicals

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 19 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

The US murdered over a million civilians in Iraq.

[–] bilb@lemmy.ml 1 points 53 minutes ago

Yeah, and those were "woke" wars according to the psychos in charge now.

Robert MacNamara stated that the US killed 3-4 million civilians during the Vietnam War. Since he was the Secretary of Defense during that time, he wouldn't have exactly benefited from exaggeration of the total.

[–] Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 28 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

after learning of the massacre, he wrote in his memoir that it was "the conscious massacre of defenseless babies, children, mothers, and old men in a kind of diabolical slow-motion nightmare that went on for the better part of a day, with a cold-blooded break for lunch".[

yo what the fuck

[–] FundMECFS@piefed.zip 5 points 4 hours ago

For context “he” here is General Westmoreland.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 17 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I suppose many of the perpetrators who were there are still alive today. I wonder if they sleep soundly in bed at night.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 12 points 8 hours ago

Of course they do. People thank them for their service. These brave brave war heroes

[–] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 20 points 12 hours ago

Someone who lacks enough empathy to brutally gang rape women and children are rarely people who feel remorse for hurting others. They unfortunately probably laugh themselves to sleep at night knowing they committed some of the sickest shit imaginable and will never be punished.

[–] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 28 points 13 hours ago

War. What is it good for. Absolutely nothing.

Other than fulfilling the desires of sociopaths under the guise of being a patriot

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 130 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

it's sad when I don't even know which massacre is being discussed, or even which theater of war or era - there are just too many examples

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 42 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

And that is the very few we know of, the more you learn about these, the more clear it becomes they cover them up unless they definitively can't. What we know barely scratches the surface of American terrorism and atrocities.

Initial reports claimed "128 Viet Cong and 22 civilians" had been killed in the village during a "fierce fire fight". Westmoreland congratulated the unit on the "outstanding job". As relayed at the time by Stars and Stripes magazine, "U.S. infantrymen had killed 128 Communists in a bloody day-long battle."

Melvin Laird the Secretary of Defense discussed them with Henry Kissinger who was at the time National Security Advisor to President Richard Nixon. Laird was recorded as saying that while he would like "to sweep it under the rug", the photographs prevented it. "They're pretty terrible", he said. "There are so many kids just laying there; these pictures are authentic".

Inside the White House, officials privately discussed how to contain the scandal. On 21 November, Kissinger emphasized that the White House needed to develop a "game plan", to establish a "press policy", and maintain a "unified line" in its public response. The White House established a "My Lai Task Force" whose mission was to "figure out how best to control the problem", to make sure administration officials "all don't go in different directions" when discussing the incident, and to "engage in dirty tricks".

[–] RaoulDuke85@piefed.social 38 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

The military had a sex trafficking and drug trade during the Iraq war.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 22 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

That sounds like something that We Should Know about.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 20 points 17 hours ago (2 children)
[–] hyperencabulator@lemmy.today 1 points 59 minutes ago (1 children)

Is that what the Denzel Washington-Russel Crowe movie, American Gangster was based on?

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 minutes ago

Idk but the book was released in 2025 so if the movie is older than that then no

[–] Nikls94@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

Why do I have that feeling that they’ll do it in Iran as well…

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 31 points 16 hours ago

YSalsoK that Colin Powell was instrumental the attempt to cover up My Lai.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I've edited the post to contain an explanation for why learning about history is important.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 3 points 8 hours ago

You could have linked this this to what we can expect in Iran, but I guess that counts.

load more comments
view more: next ›