this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
1212 points (94.4% liked)

Comic Strips

23371 readers
3375 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

Rules
  1. 😇 Be Nice!

    • Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
  2. 🏘️ Community Standards

    • Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
    • Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
    • Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
    • Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
  3. 🧬 Keep it Real

    • Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
  4. 📽️ Credit Where Credit is Due

    • Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
    • Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
  5. 📋 Post Formatting

    • Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
    • Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
    • When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
      ✅ Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
      ❌ Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
  6. 📬 Post Frequency/SPAM

    • Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 🖐) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 🖐) will be removed.
  7. 🏴‍☠️ Internationalization (i18n)

    • Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
      Sí, por favor [Spanish/Español]
  8. 🍿 Moderation

    • We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
    • When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Web Accessibility

Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.

When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:

Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)

Web of Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] flyingSock@feddit.org 86 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

where is switzerland? on the chart, this often gets touted as the counterpoint

[–] NeilNuggetstrong@lemmy.world 102 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

On this chart Norway would also be listed with 29 guns per person. These are owned by only 10% of the population however, and automatic rifles are banned for civilians. I don't disagree with the sentiment of this meme, but it's cherry picking data in exactly the same manner as "the other side" would do just for a cheap gotcha argument.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 35 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

These are owned by only 10% of the population however

Thats the case in America too, iirc like 30% of households have at least 1 gun, and if you assume 4 people per household, and 1.25 gun per American, that means the average gun-owning household has 16 guns.

[–] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It makes a lot of sense to own more than one gun. For self defense you might own one shotgun, one handgun, and a smaller handgun for concealed carry. If you’re a hunter, you likely want two rifles in different calibers, a shotgun, and a hand gun. In addition to that you might have an old gun laying around or grandpa’s old hunting gun, a range toy, some historic gun you like for some reason. Sport target shooters will have a few different guns, depending on what disciplines they shoot. Then there are also more serious collectors who might have dozens or hundreds of different firearms.

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 39 points 3 weeks ago (16 children)

Yes. What's the point of owning a firearm if you can't have a gun for when you're sleeping in your bedroom, a gun when you're on the toilet, a gun when you're on the couch watching the TV, a gun when you're at the front door greeting guests, a gun when you're driving your F150, a gun for that second amendment right, a gun when you go grocery shopping, a gun when you go buying clothes, a gun to go with your Tony Montana cosplay and you know, a gun just for fun. What are you supposed to do? Go outside without a gun? Use one gun for all those things? Don't you know switching to your sidearm is always faster than reloading?

You don't need all those guns. You want all those guns.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] affenlehrer@feddit.org 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think carrying the guns around plays a big role too

[–] DivineDev@piefed.social 13 points 3 weeks ago

Also the social safety net and availability of (mental) healthcare, it's not like Europe doesn't have some glaring problems in that regard but holy shit is it better than whatever the US is doing.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lime@feddit.nu 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (5 children)

~~next to germany~~ between Portugal and Canada. according to small arms survey, which supplied the data, switzerland has about 25 guns per 100 people and .5 deaths per 100k people.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

.5 deaths per 100 people.

You mean per 100,000 people, right?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Switzerland distributes a lot of firearms, particularly through their mandatory military service. But Switzerland also very tightly controls the supply of ammunition for all of those firearms they issue.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PixelProf@lemmy.ca 64 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

While the data might be cherry picked, one thing that can't be displayed here is motivation. In Canada, a decent number of people have guns, but you can't carry firearms with you, you have to take highly specific routes while transporting any restricted hand guns. The role of guns is sport shooting and hunting and it's highly regulated for those.

In the USA, guns are intended to be used to kill other civilians. Owning a gun for self-defense purposes is buying with the intention that you may one day use it to kill another human. Not an enemy combatant in war, but a fellow citizen with a gun.

It's only a feeling, but I feel like that might be the biggest distinction between the USA and other (omitted) high-gun-per-capita countries. Guns in the USA aren't for mitary drafting or protection against a national invasion.

There's also the matter of training and licensing. A buddy in the USA was staunchly opposed to gun licensing. When I said that in Canada, it just helps ensure that people know how to maintain their gun and use it safely, he said, "Well the people who don't take the time to learn how to maintain it and use it safely just shouldn't get it in the first place", which I'm sure is a popular enough sentiment, but it's also the argument for licensing. The zero barrier for entry approach is also a problem.

I'd love to see more nuanced stats than this 4-panel comic is presenting.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Guns in America, to me, are a perfect representation of the fallacy of personal responsibility.

Let’s take a scenario that, while tragic, has happened in the USA; a small boy of less than 6 finds a gun, plays with it, and shoots their baby sibling. The common refrain from responsible gun owners is: “You should’ve kept it locked and trained your family to use it responsibly!”

But who’s “you”? The shooter? The victim? One was killed and one was traumatized. The parent? They didn’t suffer nearly as much as the others.

So it’s not even the only issue where I hear “We need parents to be more responsible!” but simply saying that won’t change the number of drunk deadbeat parents putting zero effort into their children; and potentially leading other real human beings to suffer for it.

[–] CascadiaRo@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

In terms of assigning responsibility, this is an easy one.

“You” refers to the firearm’s owner. Firearm ownership comes with a high degree of responsibility. It means knowing and following the four rules, at least two of which must be broken at the same time for someone to get hurt. It means maintaining a reasonable degree of control over that firearm at all times, whether it’s on your person or being stored.

If anyone is “finding” a firearm, reasonable precautions were not taken to secure that firearm.

These cases all boil down to gross negligence on the owner’s part. Legally and logically, the owner should be the one to suffer the consequences.

Unfortunately, in a lot of cases, the incident gets treated as a “tragedy” and legal consequences do not get applied.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jeffep@lemmy.world 45 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Finally, proof that homicides cause gun ownership

[–] alecsargent@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I know you mean this as a joke but does that not make sense with US history?

A lot of killing causes people to own guns, a lot of guns causes a lot of killings, and repeat.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 36 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (11 children)

notice how in the graph on wikipedia, excluding USA, the correlation is really not that strong.

dont get me wrong, i agree with the general sentiment, but bad data weakens even the best of cases.

image

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago (18 children)

I get the point the comic is trying to make, but saying that more guns means more people die from guns isn't really a "gotcha"... In places with fewer guns, fewer people are using guns to do their murderings.

I'd be more interested in a graph that shows total murders per capita compared to gun ownership per capita.

Before I get dog-piled, I'd like to add that I know that there are too many guns in the US, and the process to buy a firearm is surprisingly lax. I do think there is a relationship between gun ownership and the murder rates, and the fact that most school shootings don't even make the news anymore (and if they do, it's for less than a day) indicates that the frogs have been completely boiled at this point.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (8 children)

Hold up. The US has over 100 guns per 100 people? 😳 So on average, everyone owns at least one gun? Tell me I'm reading that wrong!

[–] ilillilillilillililli@lemmy.world 41 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Close, but the best estimates are there are 470 million guns in US civilian hands. With a population of 338 million, you're looking at approximately 1.4 guns per person in this crazy land of free-dumb. 😂

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)
[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 36 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If it makes you feel better, most gun owners own many guns, so there isn't actually a gun in everyone's hands.

Just a lot of them in a few hands... Much better...

[–] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Some people are collectors, but a lot of people just have some old guns around.

Also if guns are a hobby or interest of yours, you are likely to own several. Just like people who are into headphones, mechanical keyboards, vintage gaming consoles, bicycles, etc.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's that the people who own guns tend to own gunnnsssss. Like an entire arsenal. Most people don't own any.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (21 children)

Around 40% in the USA own at least one firearm. It's probably higher now since trump is back in power.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] notabot@piefed.social 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Good news: you can read a chart correctly!

Bad news: It seems that there are approximately 120 civilian owned firearms per 100 persons in the USA: 2017 survey. See particularly the "Estimating Global Civilian-held Firearms Numbers" briefing paper and its annex. That seems to be the survey that most reports are based on. I don't imagine the number has dropped over the interveneing years.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (5 children)

It should be noted that this chart compares gun homicides to gun ownership, which... of course those will correlate

If we plotted kangaroo injuries vs kangaroos per capita, we'd see a similar outlier in Australia

It would be more useful to see gun ownership compared to total homicides, to see if an overabundance of guns correlates with more murders. Even then, though, a correlation between the two might not be casual in that direction. It may instead be that in areas with a high homicide rate, people are more likely to own a firearm for defense.

What you would need to prove is that places with high gun ownership have significantly higher homicide rates, but places with high homicide rates don't have significantly higher rates of gun ownership

[–] Maroon@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

That's exactly the point! The whole, "it's the owner, not the gun" argument is dumb. If you have more guns, you have more gun-related homicides -- as simple as that.

When the populace don't have easy access to guns, then that's one weapon less they can use to hurt others.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 26 points 3 weeks ago (19 children)

Any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 22 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

Let's discuss how the number of arms per capita correlates with workers' rights?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] SalamenceFury@piefed.social 11 points 3 weeks ago

Anyway here's the full meme for those ignorant. Guns on the hands of workers are an important part of worker's rights.

w8jdouThu8dRuIZ.png

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Azrael@reddthat.com 17 points 3 weeks ago (32 children)

I'm not a republican, but I don't think anyone is saying gun crime doesn't happen.

It's easy to say that banning guns = no more gun violence. But the devil is in the details. Given the U.S.A's history with guns, banning them will have consequences. Not can, will.

Let's not forget that a gun ban will only affect law abiding citizens.

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Comics like the one in OP always ignore the primary underlying difference between US and the other developed nations: free, nationalized healthcare vs the Insurance Apocalypse that is the American healthcare system

[–] Azrael@reddthat.com 14 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Yup. If Americans struggling with poor mental health had better access to professional help, crime as a whole would go down. But it's not the only factor. Things like financial strain and environment also contribute. Crime is a slippery slope. Not a leap.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)
[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The US seems to be a huge outlier on both axes. You would have to exclude it to make any sense of the data.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (22 children)

Arguing that the populace shouldn't have guns, and pointing to the usa as an example, is arguing that our fascist government should have a monopoly on violence. Every successful "gun control" law has been put in place in response to persecuted minorities and activist groups having guns. For a famous example, see the Black Panthers.

Peaceful protests are impotent unless backed by a genuine threat of violence. See how little the recent "No Kings" protests have accomplished vs the death of that one health insurance ceo.

Now, I am in favor of fewer guns, but the order of operations is important. Let's start with disarming the police and abolishing ice. So long as my friends/family/neighbors/whatevers are being abducted by masked thugs in broad daylight, it is my right and my duty to defend with lethal force.

[–] carrylex@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

Peaceful protests are impotent unless backed by a genuine threat of violence

Eastern europe (exluding Romania) would like to have a word.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

Oh yeah, and all yours 1.2 guns per person are doing absolute wonders right now, when you pedo in charge is rounding up people to put in concentration camps and starting wars all over the world. All your guns will start working any time now, liberating you from fascism.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (14 children)

So where is the well-regulated militia defending the United States with their huge arsenal of guns? We're not hearing anything about valiant protectors of the constitution taking up arms against the domestic enemies that are ICE, MAGA, etc...it's almost as if the whole spiel about needing guns to resist a tyrannical government was BS all along. 🤔

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Looks to me like the United States of Epstein is Firearms Georg. The correlation is pretty weak for the rest of the data.

Though you shouldn't listen to me, I'm not a stasts- statitcis- uh, data ninja

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (45 children)

Hey, look, it's divisive rhetoric!

Crimes and violence are caused by unjustified heirarchies, in particular, the ruling class ruling over the working class.

You know what would reduce school shootings? Publicly funded mental health services for young people.

This kind of post is aimed at dividing the working class into two groups, pro-gun, and anti-gun. Refuse to give in to their messaging. Solidarity across the WHOLE working class!

load more comments (45 replies)
[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

The biggest things are the types of firearm and the "reason" (ie. attitude)

I live somewhere where there are loads of firearms. I come from a country with a firearm-to-person ratio that surprises people

Because firearm crime is vanishingly low

Firearms are tools, not toys. Very few people here think a rifle makes their dick bigger.

Sidearms aren't a thing. If you can get a licence to own one, it's because you're a recognised security professional, a sports handgun shooter (so your firearms are under lock and key at a range accredited appropriately) and you can't get ammunition without the proper protections in place

NO CIVILIAN NEEDS TO OWN A SIDEARM

Obviously, in 'Murica, the genie is out of the bottle, but their problems with violent crime run deeper

In my country, a criminal with a knife is subdued with a milk-crate, because life isn't thrown away so quickly He was stopped without further loss of life

I actually dislike firearms, but I acknowledge that they have a role in civilised society

America isn't civilised, and it's a backwards shithole that thinks action movies are documentaries

It's full of people who want to hurt people, and they're obsessed with making sure that they are able to

It's pathetic

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Children getting shot up at school is just a way of life we all have to accept according to American leadership.

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 3 weeks ago

Amazing how this topic/narrative surges whenever the chances of leftists and minorities arming themselves and/or actually doing something peak.

So what happened this time? Recent Performative Resistance/"No-Kings Protest" turn-out lower than expected? Higher? Someone show up armed and people talked to them instead of assuming they were a counter-protestor? Police and other local morons particularly brutal in a way the press couldn't gloss?

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Firearm sales have TRIPLED since 2000.

Fun fact: Gun sales (and production) don't dip under Democratic leadership. USA is world's number one arms dealer (all weapons)

Every state is involved in the firearms industry, even Hawaii.

https://www.nssf.org/government-relations/impact/

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

More guns than people is a funny stat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 9 points 3 weeks ago

Oh but the 2nd amendment's to protect from invaders foreign and domestic, to protect people and freedom...

USA, how's that working out for you?

Highest prison population, highest rates of asset forfeiture (legalised theft by cops), highest health costs with worst health outcomes, highest rates of poisonous pollutants in "food" supply, countless ways the "democracy" is a sham with lobbying (legalised bribery) and voter suppression just the tip of the iceberg, education system and media dumbing down the population into totalitarianism, groupthink manufactured to keep people divided and conquered, false flag operations to manufacture emergencies to give government the right to rescind your rights, the orwellian named SAVE, GENIUS, CLARITY statutes and more to do the opposite continuing to worsen the situation... on and on and on it goes...

Keep repeating "we are free", harder! XD

Those guns will start to protect you soon. Just like the wealth will begin to trickle down... annnny minute now...

load more comments
view more: next ›