this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2026
175 points (95.3% liked)

simpsonsshitposting

5237 readers
375 users here now

I just think they're neat!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

They're no longer gooey here. They were gooey in the 90ies and early 2000 but at some point the recipe changed now they're grainy and dry.

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm sure it boils down to "so you're saying we can save a few money by simply changing the fundamental characteristic of our product?"

No, it's the children that are wrong!

[–] stickly@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

They also are one of the worst shrinkflation examples ever. Get those tiny eggs outta here.

It also makes no sense to shrink them if you think about it. Square-cube law means they're packaging way more milk chocolate per sale, which is almost certainly the most expensive ingredient.

[–] Murse@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

The chocolate also got worse. I used to get excited about these this time of year... now they don't even make me feel nostalgic - everything about them has enshittified to the point of nonrecognition.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

I miss when they were gooey. I got a white chocolate one from the UK this year, and it was kinda gooey. But not what it was like in the 90s.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

These were amazing when they were three for a quid. Like all great British success stories we allowed the yanks to buy Cadbury’s, and now year by year the eggs get smaller or more expensive or cheaper tasting.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Cadbury was considered quality chocolate in NZ, regularly topped the most trusted brands in NZ lists. Then they tried to replace cocoa solids with palm oil (perhaps 20 years ago), and what feels like overnight they were outed and now are hardly ever mentioned. A local brand took over the quality chocolate spot, and eventually Carbury had to shut the NZ factory.

I like to think people learn about it when studying marketing / branding degrees.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I like to think people learn about it when studying marketing / branding degrees.

They learn how much money the execs personally made in the process, and resolve to replicate that "success" for themselves as early and often as possible.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Never forget they mad them smaller and then lied about it.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The worst part isn't even the shrinkflation itself; it's that it fucks with the creme to chocolate ratio because of the square-cube law.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 4 points 2 weeks ago

The lying is the worst part. If companies would stop covering up or hiding it, it'd be less infuriating.

[–] obelisk_complex@piefed.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Dammit I miss having raw semiliquid sugar encapsulated in more, solid (also, more solid) chocolate-flavoured sugar. Guilty pleasure, plus nostalgia?

9XWzqeQOuM3PFc4.gif

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

It's only palm fat, sugar or corn syrup anyway in different forms

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

It just tastes like sugar paste. There’s no flavour, it’s just sugar in sugar

[–] Quexotic@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

It used to actually be creamy before Kraft bought Hershey in 2010 who bought Cadbury in 1988, it's all granulated and nasty... And small.

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

You could tell me it tastes like salt and musk and I'd gurgle on gallons of yellow tinged goo

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 4 points 2 weeks ago

Gotta have dat sugary goo

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago

I look forward to buying one for a quarter tomorrow.