this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2026
122 points (99.2% liked)

science

26630 readers
740 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OldGrayDog@fedinsfw.app 3 points 59 minutes ago

Or maybe we're living in a simulation and whatever is generating it only has a finite number of characters. 😲

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 33 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Strange, almost like phenotype is dependent on genotype?

[–] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

You're telling me people whose genetics make them look similar have similar genetics???

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 1 points 44 minutes ago (1 children)

Not proven until now.

These “duh” comments are always here in these situations.

[–] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 33 minutes ago (1 children)

We're just joking around here my friend :) of course it's important to confirm, still funny every time

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 1 points 31 minutes ago (1 children)

I hope so, that’s good to hear. Some people seem so pissed off when making such comments about “useless” studies. 😔

[–] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 25 minutes ago

People in text always sound more pissed off than they were. That mostly has to do with your expectations though ;)

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Big, if true

[–] NullPointerException@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

DNA has a limited number of genes. Considering the enormous amount of functions they need to encode, the number of genes for each function becomes relatively small. 8 billion people and thousands of generations, we’re bound to have duplicates.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

That's not exactly true. A lot of DNA is redundant, and a lot of DNA is dead code that doesn't do anything.

[–] Staff@piefed.world 2 points 50 minutes ago

Is it really dead code, or we haven't found out what it does?

[–] Brocon@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

I would say it's even smaller in number. Because some combinations would not work and might kill you.

[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

...We all look like 98% similar.

[–] EntheoNaut@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 hours ago

they all look the same..

thinks some alien, prolly

[–] temporal_spider@masto.ai 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

@RegularJoe I'm curious about how this might work across ethnicities. I can't point to a photo, but several times, I've noticed people from other continents who could easily be someone I know here, except they're African, or Asian, when the person I know is white, just for example. Under the expected differences in hair, eyes, etc, the basic facial structure is the same. A DNA match seems less likely in these cases.

[–] borth@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think it's about a DNA match. Those people you mention could share more DNA than the rest of us, which could account for their similarities, but their DNA will never "match" anyone else's.

[–] Smeagol666@crazypeople.online 1 points 40 minutes ago

All humans are within 23 degrees of being cousins. The thing that surprised me most is that sub Saharan Africans are the most diverse genetically speaking.

[–] StoneyPicton@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 hours ago

Nice to see research shared like this, thanks. I've always been fascinated by facial similarities. The other thing I often look at, especially when pronounced, is the difference in the two hemispheres of the face.

[–] MolochHorridus@piefed.social -2 points 3 hours ago

Pictured “doppelgängers” have very little common outside pose and hair/beard styles.