this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2026
1000 points (94.9% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

39436 readers
4770 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1000
Future (quokk.au)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) by restingOface@quokk.au to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
 

EDIT: A rough timeline of events here:

  1. In 2024, a user noticed this odd traffic on their local network, took a screenshot of the graph, and posted it to Twitter
  2. After discussing the issue with other Twitter users, the original poster realized that this graph was actually a mistake with their router or something. This reporting software was reporting some other device's network traffic as being the washing machine's traffic. The washing machine was actually only using a reasonable amount of data.
  3. Despite this past revelation, in 2026, someone put together a "meme" of sorts comparing past predictions of the future to that 2024 graph
  4. For whatever reason, that "meme" was put through AI post-processing of some sort. Was the attempt to "upscale" this image after it had been passed around and been automatically compressed down by various platforms? Was it someone using some newfangled AI-assisted compression technique in an attempt to create a smaller file size than any of the more traditional compression techniques? No idea. For whatever reason, it seems someone put it through some sort of AI post-processing that left the image with some nonsense text on the graph portion.
  5. I saw this "meme" and decided to share it here without scrutinizing the text on the graph. As mentioned in my first point, this graph was originally posted years ago, so I was already familiar with it and did not feel the need to read into it in the image I was sharing. I felt safe assuming it was just the same graph that I remember seeing years back.
  6. After users here called out the nonsense text, I just recreated the "meme" from scratch. I grabbed the original screenshot of the graph from Twitter and a stock photo of clouds, and just placed some text on the image so that this is more-or-less the same exact "meme", but without the AI gibberish
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Lesson: never buy an appliance that has internet connectivity.

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago

the hell? why the fuck a washing machine needs a wifi for? to google how to wash clothes?

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 22 points 8 hours ago

Related: a criminal group managed to steal data from a casino thanks to their internet connected fish tank. In 2017

https://www.forbes.com/sites/leemathews/2017/07/27/criminals-hacked-a-fish-tank-to-steal-data-from-a-casino/

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 5 hours ago

What is a washing machine doing that adds up to 3.7 gigs of data, per DAY? How many loads it does? How long it sits before it gets emptied? Why would anyone even care?

[–] Tiral@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Well you do need 17 blood settings, it needs to send a dvd to figure that out /s

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 9 points 8 hours ago

I imagine a darkened office in the far outreaches of an LG research facility where a hermit lives.

They call him the stain expert. He gazes at this data all day.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 11 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

If they ever sell a smart hammer that measures my impact strength and sends it to some system somewhere for further analysis then I'm giving up building. Let the damn AI build. Why does the world incorporate tech even when it adds nothing to a pre-existing method and drives up the price? Oh...I get it now.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Because "data is the new oil."

Doesn't matter what that data is, collect it first, and figure out how to sell it later.

[–] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

And the typical consumer has no critical thinking skills and also, is ignorant, and very often a moron, and a sucker. People aren’t smart. The appliances are lol. And the people at the top of giant companies have a greed that is insatiable.

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

except this oil is like 99% useless given the current scope of data collection.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

You say that, until your hammer data is used to detect improper use, which your employer's insurance can use to deny a claim.

Or it can be used to void a warranty. Or it could detect G-forces of your commute to work and raise your car insurance rates for hard accelerations. Or a biometric sensor in the handle can tell your boss if you can work another 30 minutes before there is a financially significant risk of heatstroke.

You get the idea, that data is useless, until some hairbrained jackass packages it and sells it's to an even more unscrupulous asshole.

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

i wonder why the governments haven't close this shop given how fucked up this whole thing is... oh wait...

[–] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Psssst. They’re “in on it.”

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Though it would be cool to do that and then set up microphones to pick up the house settling sounds and see if there's a correlation. If only those with the resources to set that up could be trusted to not abuse that access to data because I wouldn't consent to some data firm having access to mics in my place.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

The products are made to male the owners Roch not benefit the users.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 27 points 12 hours ago

Bored household item developed sexting addiction with ChatGPT

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago

For some, there are. Just have to be a multi millionaire.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Go a little back and look at the prediction made in 1949 for the future, written in a book with the title "1984".

Sure, it came a little late than forecast, but a lot of it came true.

Today's society has been pretty predictable for quite a while:

  • Political and social environments like now have been pretty common recurrences througout History, with the rise of Fascism in the early XX century being the previous time it happened (incredibly similar to nowadays, not just are most propaganda techniques and discourse used by the rightwing almost exactly same, but we even have a XXI century version of the NAZIs called Zionism doing pretty much the same thing as their predecessors did in 1930s Germany). Society and Economics seem to follow a grand-cycle with a period of around 100 years and we're back at the point of the cycle of "Highest inequality and the Elites diverting the discontentment of the populus away from them by funding Far-Right politics scapegoating foreigners and using tools of authoritarianism in power" hence why this shit ressonates so much with the 1920 - 30s.
  • The extreme desire for surveillance of open authoritarians and those with covert authoritarian leanings (lots of those in Europe plus the previous regime in the US was already the latter, though now it's the former) and the forms it could take were pretty predictable by observing the secret police of the Fascist regimes in Southern Europe that lasted until the 70s and 80s as well in the Eastern Block, most notably the Stasi in Germany. It's quite linear to map what Stasi would do with today's technology and come up with using smartphones as mobile surveillance devices with the complicity of the Tech companies that control them (predictably so if you look at, for example, how IBM helped NAZI Germany), surveillance of citizen's use of the Internet and modern digital communications (already done by the 7-eyes for ages and explaining things like the repeated attempts at imposing Chat Control on EU citizens) and the increasing automation of mass trawling surveillance made possible by ML to allow far wider civil society surveillance levels than were possible for the Stasi.

Sure, people used to think "Democracy" and thus "This time is different", but it turns out politicians and elites under Democracy still operate per the very same principles of Power as in the early XX century, they just managed over the years since then to get the populace to stop thinking and talking about Power itself and instead think only in terms of Politics all the while making sure Politics was subservient to older forms of Power, most notably Money.

Personally, ever since I observed how governments in the West reacted to the 2008 Crash, most notably who they chose to save and who they chose to pay for it, that I realized that the power of Democracy (specifically, the control of Citizens over how countries are managed by chosing who manages it using their Vote) has been made almost entirelly subservient to the power of Money, which is why it looks so much like we live in Oligarchies with theatrical Voting that changes only that which Money doesn't care about (hence the loud Identity Wars in the Moral plane between the dominant parties) rather than real Democracy.

[–] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Brave New World got it even better because in that book, everyone welcomed oppression with open arms and celebrated it.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

say what you will about al-qaeda but at least they made a solid demonstration as you why flying cars have always been a stupid fucking idea.

[–] MrFinnbean@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Hmm. This sounds like maths.

Quick google search say that averag plane weights are about 40 000 kg for small jets, 70 000kg for narrow-body planes and up to 570 000 kg for large wide-body planes.

While average car weight is somewhere in the 2000 kg mark.

If the dreams of flying cars come to trough the way most scifi/cyperpunk depicts them and the flight speeds would be at the similiar range than driving on the street.

So lets be generous and say flying cars would be much hevyer and weight 3000kg and the flight speed would max 175 km/h wich is pretty much the max speed for regular cars.

Lets go with the average plane so Weight is 70 000kg and flight speed is 930km/h

So maths:

E = 0.0386 * m * v^2

Car: E = 0.0386 * 3 000 * 175^2 ≈ 3.5MJ

Plane: E = 0.0386 * 70 000 * 930^2 ≈ 2.3GJ

So you would need about 670 cars to get same impact as one plane.

*all the numbers came from google-fu and from my ass. Also all the maths was done while sitting on a toilet, so there is large margin for error.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
  1. who says you need the same impact? a car can still fly through your window.

  2. I'm not talking about literally recreating 9/11 itself, especially since the twin towers are not as tall as they were. shame. anyway, my point is flying cars make any kind of accident a potential mini-9/11. you can put guardrails on roads, what the hell are you going to have for flying cars?

[–] MrFinnbean@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago
  1. Nobody
  2. I just wanted to calculate stuff for fun.

Talking about the danger. Cars can allready be driven to masses and many houses or businesess dont have any guard railings protecting them from normal cars, but we dont see those happening that much. Why it would suddenly change, by adding additional dimension.

Also small planes are not really that hard to come by. Why we dont have those driving in to buildings now?

Also doing "mini-9/11" would most certainly kill or atleast hospitialize the driver. I can somehow understand giving your live for cause you support and cause the enemy lot of pain, but i think there would be much higher treshold to give a life for something that is very unlikely to do anything but structural damage and hurt your self.

More likelly would be crashing while driving under influence, but i would imagine there would be higher treshold for anybody to fly drunk than drive drunk.

load more comments
view more: next ›