this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
93 points (97.9% liked)

PieFed Meta

4661 readers
116 users here now

Discuss PieFed project direction, provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics.

Wiki

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This project does not allow contributions generated by large languages models (LLMs). We are taking these steps due to:

  • The potential negative influence of AI generated content on quality, developer alienation from their code and skill rot.
  • Legal complications such as the inability to claim copyright and ensure others' licensing and copyright have not been violated.
  • Ethical concerns including but not limited to those regarding intellectual property theft, environmental impact, the effect on already-marginalized groups, devaluing labor for the purpose of concentrating power among the billionaire class, etc.

This ban of AI generated content applies to all parts of the project, including, but not limited to, code, documentation, issues, and artworks. An exception applies for translating texts for issues, discussions, and their comments to English.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rjwilliamson@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 hours ago

How will this be enforced?

[–] karasu_sue@pf.korako.me 20 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Previously, when AI-related discussions came up, I was using AI to translate my posts into English. I was concerned about becoming a target because of that, so I ended up closing all my issues and stopped participating in the chat.

It helps a lot that translation into English has now been explicitly allowed as an exception.

[–] homes@piefed.world 7 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Out of curiosity, are non-AI tools like translate.google.com insufficient for your needs?

Edit: never mind. Apparently, Google translate uses Google‘s internally developed LLMs since 2020. :/

[–] klu9@piefed.social 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Since 2020, [... Google Translate] has implemented deep learning networks based on transformers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Translate#Neural_machine_translation

[–] homes@piefed.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, that’s definitely part of their internally developed LLM. I remember reading about Google developing this when I was in design school. I just didn’t know that Google translate was using it, too, but I suppose I should’ve known.

Thanks for posting this.

[–] karasu_sue@pf.korako.me 2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I use Google Translate when reading, but I still feel that Japanese translations are not always perfect.

For writing, I usually translate with ChatGPT, then check it again by retranslating into Japanese with DeepL, and pick the version that feels the most natural.

[–] wjs018@piefed.wjs018.xyz 1 points 2 hours ago

When I am translating from Japanese, I find that DeepL is the most consistently understandable and accurate. I have copy/pasted many an article from Comic Natalie into translators to compare with what Anime News Network writes, and that is my experience.

[–] homes@piefed.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I don’t particularly like ChatGPT. I tend to favor Claude just because it’s far less obsequious and tends to give a bit more pushback and is more critical.

I also like the structure of it answers a bit more. Maybe it’s just a matter of taste, but I really don’t trust an LLM model that keeps kissing my ass so much.

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 2 points 11 hours ago

That's really cool, and thanks for taking the communities input on this!

[–] squirrel@cake.kobel.fyi 14 points 18 hours ago

Thank you for the clear words. This reassures me to keep using and working on PieFed.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@piefed.social 9 points 16 hours ago

Thank you for keeping this slop free.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

"Intellectual property theft" isn't a thing. The correct terms are "copyright infringement" or "trademark infringement" or "plagiarism" or something like that, and you should be specific about which you're talking about.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 13 hours ago

Thanks. I will give my peanut gallery perspective. This is a social software and its good its made by people. Its good enough as it is now and it will be great if it gets better but there is no urgent timeline to do so. Its better the improvements be things people like so much that someone wants to get it working. I think of it like a club. You can be a member and show up and have fun but you can volunteer for setup and such and that can be fun in its own way and you can become part of the leadership or start your own or whatever. This is not a corporation that needs to make profits. It should happen in a cummunal human like way.

[–] Emotional_Series7814@piefed.zip 7 points 17 hours ago

Happy to see this.

kvetching over negativity
Wish it got as many upvotes as the "AI did a bad thing/is invading everything" headlines, but alas, good news hacks your brain to engage far less than something you're mad at.

[–] etherphon@piefed.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Glad to see this, thank you and everyone for your hard work!