this post was submitted on 02 May 2026
122 points (87.7% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

45883 readers
1895 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Oof.

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 126 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Hannah works as a third-grade teacher and refuses to give 100% on any assignment to any of her students because "only Jesus was perfect."

Source: I made it up.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 46 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

I know you meant that a joke, but upon further research into this, I discovered that it's actually true.

Source: I also made it up

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 23 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The sad thing is, jokes aside for some teachers is actually is accurate.

source: grandfather had a college professor that said his personal policy was that a student could never jump more than one letter grade between quarters.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 14 points 4 days ago

You both get up votes for your properly referenced sources.

[–] WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

You were both eerily close to correct though.

Probably.

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 18 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I had a teacher that refused to give 100% on any tests because he only left room for two digits when he drew up his marking list. True story.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I had a teacher who would give two points for each correct answer out of, say, 47 questions. So the highest score you could get was 94%. This was for a math test.

[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But... 47/47 is 100%........

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You figured it out! You win math! 😀

[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well done! You win the perfect score of 94%!

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

A perfect 8/13 (Spoilers for The Good Place)

[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Awful teacher even if they had questions no one would know, cause maybe they had a prodigy in their class or maybe someone that studied that subject to death, that's a horrible outcome for the kid who got all questions correct.

I guess you could go Farnsworth route and say penmanship counts. (Futurama joke). Though at a certain age range that's not really applicable I guess it depends the grade level for my annoyance at that teacher I'll probably forget it in a moment anyways. Still awful teacher if they got all questions correct, and wasn't a trick one in there.

Edit forgot to add also if the work showed all steps of logic (usually math but sure you get what I mean). No one learning should be denied a perfect score if they learned it is all.

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 days ago

My French teacher told me this is how grades work in France for real.

[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 50 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

"I typically don't give 10/10 scores because I feel like it doesn't leave anything to work towards."

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 22 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Which makes sense, as long as you haven't said it was absolutely perfect I wouldn't change a thing.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 39 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

An unstoppable Hannah (literally perfect; 9/10) meets an immovable Newgrounds reviewer (game wouldn't boot; 5 stars).

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 26 points 4 days ago (2 children)

If you say 10/10, it feels disingenuous. 9/10, no one neurotypical really questions it.

[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

10/10 comment, no question.

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] zer0hour@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I remember that guy with rice 7/10

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

Well I feel pretty fucking seen....

[–] purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 19 points 4 days ago

For the record Josh gave her a 10.

Also not the people in the picture.

[–] needanke@feddit.org 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

You left out the [Best part].(https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2026/may/02/blind-date-josh-hannah)

First impressions?

On the way I was 15 steps behind a man who I thought could be Josh when he paused to interact with a street cat. (I had put animal friendly as my preference for my date.)

Josh sounds like a catch!

[–] JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

It's good to know this is a turn on. I approach many animals.
Once a cat kept following me and I had to convince it to go back, though.
Another time someone's cat just went to sleep on my lap, and I was late to college...
... And there was that one time I got chased by peacocks, squirrels, and random birds because I was feeding them walnuts...

Something tells me there should be a limit, but I can't quite put my finger on it.

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Mebbies she didn't give 10/10 because he wasn't actually blind?

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

In that case shouldn't he be 20/20

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago

YEAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

TBF, he could have been richer and more handsome.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago

or endowed in other ways.

[–] napkin2020@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

Perfection is a moving target...

[–] SPRUNTnsfw@fedinsfw.app 4 points 4 days ago

Sounds like a perfect 5 of 7 to me.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Josh, you can have her.

[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 days ago

I'd kiss her right on the circle line