this post was submitted on 04 May 2026
323 points (98.5% liked)

politics

29644 readers
2272 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Sounds like he’ll be doing weekend at Bernie’s soon.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Fun fact: Trump is the same age now that Biden was in 2022.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fun fact: Obama is younger now than Donald Trump was when he took office.

[–] enphurgen@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fun fact, If Donald died tomorrow millions of people would take the day off and celebrate

[–] Furbag@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago

Wow, that is a fun fact! ☺️

[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

The only fun I manage to get out of that fact is the idea that the overdue blood clot delivery could be and day now.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 159 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I love when media plays stupid. It isn’t a joke.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fuck the media. They should have been reporting on project 2025 nonstop during the election. Somehow it's not considered "objective" reporting to say when a political party are objectively fascists who intend to strip away people's rights

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

Maddow did. Every day. MSNBC

[–] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Id love to see his fucking skull crack a joke

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 85 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He's not kidding. He's building a fucking ballroom, a project that will go past 2029. He has no intention of ever leaving office. He won't leave unless physically forced to. Fuck you if you think the government will make him leave just because the law says they will

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I think a cardiovascular event will sort it out eventually. Let's hope it happens sooner rather than later.

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 13 points 1 day ago

Should have happened 30 years ago.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] runiq@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Three guesses as to why he wants to build a bunker underneath.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (3 children)

You know what? I think its time to set up an seperate national assembly of some sort to address the actual problems of the people. Let's just pat the rich on the head, let Congress go sniff tRump's farts, then go govern the addressing of actual problems (the unaffordablility of food, the lack of healthcare to the masses, global heating, AI causing mass unemployment, etc.). Our government clearly refuses to address the actual problems of the masses, so lets collectively assemble a seperate but equal governing body to address them ourselves.

[–] ButtermilkBiscuit@feddit.nl 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We have the right to abolish the government - https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcript

The question is will those in power turn the military towards the people and try to kill citizens acting legally? The answer is absolutely they will kill as many as possible to preserve their world order where the rich get everything and you get nothing. The only hope for our side is that there are far more of us then there are of them - even when you count the pedophile loving magats.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

The only hope for our side is that there are far more of us then there are of them

Why do you think they're making such an enormous investment in robots and mass surveillance?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

He knows something we don't. Something like, there's not going to be any election.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

First of all, he doesn't KNOW anything. Literally. He is profoundly ignorant, easily the dumbest person to ever occupy the presidency. It's isn't even close. He is mind-bogglingly STUPID.

So he knows what he wants, and he thinks wishes are facts, and repeats them with the full confidence of the narcissistic simpleton. Don't mistake that confidence for competence, or anything else. He's a Sociopath, who has learned to hide it under bluster and noise. He's just shouting like a crazy homeless person. It doesn't make any sense, why would you listen to it?

You are under no obligation to believe it, or worry about it. He thinks he can rig the election by gerrymandering a few extra House seats, but that isn't going to get him anywhere near the number of seats he needs, and he's not taking into account the 5-10 MAGA seats that are almost certainly going to be surpirse flips that nobody will know about until election night.

He's trying to convince you not to vote. Instead of listening, you have between now and November to convince at least one friend who wasn't going to vote, to finally do it, especially if you are in a red state or district. That's where the flips will happen, and we need all the votes we can get.

[–] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

YES - voting is not a sign of weakness or complacency. And not voting because you oppose the system doesn't register in broader society as opposition - it registers as apathy, which just emboldens these assholes.

If you're an American who doesn't vote "on principle", please reconsider. You don't have to vote for people you don't like. You don't even have to cast a vote in all the races. But do vote. I guarantee there is someone on your ballot you want to support, be it a Green or an Independent, or an especially maverick Democrat. Heck, there might even be a Socialist on your ballot.

And don't forget there are state and local races too, and those are much easier to impact than federal races. Even if The Donald has a successful coup this time around, you'll be better off living in a town run by people who aren't beholden to the duopoly, and that only happens if people of conscience vote.

If everyone who refused to vote out of some principled notion instead voted their conscience, we'd have a very different government from the one we have now. It would still suffer from corruption and manipulation by the ownership class, but much less so than it does currently.

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

He doesn't know but he's been priming us for it since 2021

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 66 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Haha its all fun and games until people break and a prominent white building gets burned down during a very important meeting!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xerxes@piefed.social 50 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Do you want a civil war? Because this is how you get a civil war.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 25 points 1 day ago (22 children)

The only people willing to do civil war in a meaningful number are being pardoned for j6.

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Vieric@piefed.social 54 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah... jokes. Anything bad he says is always a joke, even when it isn't. Hell, especially when it isn't. These stupid media fuckers need to stop with the damn kid gloves. But hey, long as they get their money they don't give a fuck about us, hell, they'll even sell us out to the highest bidder.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago

It's literally never a joke with this guy

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 day ago (5 children)

What does that say about America's politics when our only hope of stopping Trump is McDonald's

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 8 points 1 day ago

He’s already incoherent much of the time; he’ll be in memory care by then.

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (7 children)

No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In before SCOTUS declares US Constitution unconstitutional.

(too late?)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

You see, they forgot to define "Term". Just because there's an election doesn't mean it's a term. It really means you get a second chance if you're voted out, but not a third. Unless...

-SCOTUS 2028, Probably

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 9 points 1 day ago

Technically, "Election" is not the only way to become president. He is eligible for other roles in the line of succession. Speaker of the House can be anyone that the House chooses, not necessarily a member of the House.

We're a "Night of the Long Knives" away from the kind of bullshit that would put him back in the White House.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It says they can't be elected to office. What about when he cancels elections and extends his existing term indefinitely?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] paranoid@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can't wait until he suggests his eldest son should take over after he dies because how much worse can things get?

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I don't think Trump likes his kids that much.

He's also worked fairly hard to not have a successor, because he's a malignant narcissist who doesn't care what happens after he's gone.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›