this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
1264 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

86646 readers
3199 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For a while now the transition away from Manifest V2 (MV2) to MV3 has been on-going and it looks like it is entering its final phase of deprecation, at least, in the case of Google Chrome. A recent discussion thread in the w3c WebExtensions Community Group GitHub repo has highlighted how the latest and upcoming versions of the most popular browser are expected to be its final releases with support for MV2 extensions.

What this essentially means is that the tricks and bypasses that were used to keep MV2 extensions like uBlock Origin and others alive will not work any more on Chrome, or at least not for very long. For example the Windows Registry mod that could extend MV2 availability will cease to function after Chromium version 151.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 465 points 1 month ago (27 children)

laughs in Firefox/Librewolf

[–] iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world 89 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No worries, play store-recaptcha is coming for you too!

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 87 points 1 month ago (1 children)

affects mobile the most obviously... but google's playbook is to basically have forced telemetry always and enforce integrity of their telemetry, and by extension advertising etc.

https://piunikaweb.com/2026/05/07/google-recaptcha-play-services-requirement/ - this just seems like an ok article for it, I did a simple web search and it came up, but others certainly exist if you dislike the source.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Looking forward to when they remove the old options & force PC users to scan reCAPTCHA QRs:

“Scan to verify you’re human” screenshot

[–] SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net 65 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (10 children)

Those sites will be dead to me :)

QR codes are like the popups of days gone by. With incredibly few exceptions, I refuse to scan them. They are so easy to redirect for nefarious purposes, and you can’t easily inspect the url to know, assuming thats something you even do. Also my phone case covers the camera and it’s a bitch to get open so I’m very choosy with what gets camera time.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 335 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Pretty fucked up considering how much malware and scammy bullshit come though ads.

[–] henfredemars@lemdro.id 199 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yep, sorry but not sorry. Advertisements aren’t safe. The industry has been ruined by bad actors and it’s a shame, but also not my problem.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 138 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I worked in ads only a few months and learned how fucked that industry was. They're basically given license to just run scripts in your browser, sucking as much info as they can. The fact that it hasn't been regulated to hell is shocking, and truly a failure of all leaders.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 76 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They’re basically given license to just run scripts in your browser

That's the crazy thing.

You want to show me an image, maybe an animated gif, and link it to your website where you're selling shit? Fine. Annoying, but fine.

But I don't care how many crocodile tears they shed about 'but websites depend on ad income' -- I am not letting random, unvetted advertisers run arbitrary code on my computer. I don't care if it's in a sandbox inside a sandbox. Exploits may be found, sandboxes may be escaped. And there's plenty of trouble they can get into even within their little sandbox, like running a fucking crypto miner or something.

So, yeah. Adblock and noscript everywhere and always.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 51 points 1 month ago

Honestly, not that shocking.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The whole industry is bad actors. The quaint, pastoral idea of actually advertising things you genuinely might want to know about is utterly beyond dead, it died the moment they realized they could use the same pipeline to harvest data and manipulate and control people. Using it for mere advertising is a waste of everyone's time and resources when they have an option so much more lucrative on the table.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 185 points 1 month ago (21 children)

Oh look all the "chrome but in a different outfit" browsers are doing the same terrible shit? What a shocker, no one could have predicted that the many many things all on the same base where actuality just fake competition.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 84 points 1 month ago (13 children)

Firefox has webserial support now. I no longer need anything chromium. Let them rot.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago (23 children)

They are all chrome with google scratched out and their name written in sharpie in its place.

Of course they are all doing it, cause they are all the same thing.

load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] DrakeAlbrecht@lemmy.world 127 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The more you tighten your grip, Google, the more ad revenue will slip through your fingers.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 73 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They could have sat on 30 second ads every 15 minutes till the cows came home and most of us would have been fine with it.

They could have sat on premium family for $9 a month for years and we'd have been ok with it.

They had to be greedy as fuck until none of us want to use their services.

[–] Airfried@piefed.social 50 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The line has to go up. That is literally the law. The fact that Youtube has a larger income than Disney doesn't mean it will stop. They can never stop. They just can crash and burn down eventually but only after making a few people very very rich.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 111 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Remember that article awhile back about the FBI recommending you use an adblocker?

That means even the FBI recommends you don't use Google and Microsoft browsers anymore

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 111 points 1 month ago (8 children)

The browser wars have been kind of strange from the perspective of someone who's been using Firefox for well over a decade. It's a bit like hearing about the Civil War while living in Oregon.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 92 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Government becomes more fascist, tech companies become more fascist.

People don’t like surveillance advertising, and most reject it when given the choice. Unpopular policies are squashed when the people are represented, and the Republican policies and interests of forced and extreme deregulation are being represented here, not the people’s.

That, and I believe advertising is inherently fascistic in the way that it distorts realty, and intrusively attempts to modify thinking with punitive, insulting, and psychologically coercive methods - it is corporate propaganda, and when it is combined with surveillance and purchased by the State, it becomes fascism.

I can’t wait for them to try and make ad-blocking illegal. We’re seeing a similar trend with the age verification firm Yoti “reporting” GrapheneOS users to “the authorities”, whatever the hell that Gestapo bullshit scare-tactic means. If FOSS software and ad-blocking are tools of privacy and freedom from thought manipulation, and those concepts are being attacked by a State-backed corporate entity, then the State no longer represents those values. Chrome, like so much other corporate software that has sunk to surveillance advertising with a healthy side of selling data to the government, is now just another fascist tool to punish democratic resistance.

Freedom from advertising is a human right.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 month ago (4 children)

The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. ...

~Edward Bernays From his 1928 publication - Propaganda

Edward is the father of modern advertising through psychological manipulation.

He's the reason bacon and eggs are breakfast.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] const_void@lemmy.ml 81 points 1 month ago (75 children)

Cue the Brave shills “recommending” to switch to Brave in 5..4..3..

load more comments (75 replies)
[–] DigDoug@lemmy.world 73 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (17 children)

Firefox and its derivatives (and Safari - sorry Apple users) are the only browsers not using Google's Blink web engine these days - at least until Ladybird is released.

Despite the Mozilla Foundation's many stupid decisions, Firefox (and Safari) is starting to look like the only thing stopping Google from completely controlling the internet.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] SecretiveVault@lemmy.zip 70 points 1 month ago (13 children)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] CarpalTunnelButt@sh.itjust.works 65 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 63 points 1 month ago (11 children)

When will marketing people figure out our generation views ads as hostile, non-consensual, and unwanted? They are a negative way to introduce us to your product/service. I actively avoid things with obnoxious ads. Native, old spice, liberty mutual, all of those brands the first thing that comes to mind is the negative experience of an invasive advertisement I never fucking asked for.

[–] HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub 35 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Except we are not customers, and it's the customers that are important. I's like cows asking between themselves when will the butcher realize that they do not like being killed for meat.

Butcher knows, but butcher doesn't sell comfort to cos, he sells meat to customers.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] nukeforyou@lemmy.zip 54 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Great.. I work in IT so this means MORE "virus" calls because you 100000000% need an adblocker on the web to stop those fake "your computer is being hacked" malicious advertisements from websites.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] EtzBetz@feddit.org 48 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Just use Firefox (or Zen Browser, which is a nice fork of Firefox)

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 45 points 1 month ago (24 children)

Who here actually uses these shitass browsers?

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 107 points 1 month ago

Here on Lemmy, not many.

Its about 75% of the world though.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

the average person on lemmy probably cares more about privacy than the average internet dweller.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 29 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The average internet dweller doesn't even know they've lost privacy.

after all, their post has a delete button next to it and their messages say private! They wouldn't just lie

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Here? We’re a rounding error not worth considering.

The majority of users do not use any web browser. They “click on the internet”.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 41 points 1 month ago

The enshittification is going on overdrive I see...

[–] THE_GR8_MIKE@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good thing I don't use any of those shitty browsers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SupremeDonut@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)

People will *anything *except use FireFox

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago

Man up and take your spyware like an obedient peasant

[–] ItsMeForRealNow@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

Laughs in Firefox based browsers

[–] Solrac@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)

And people still use these trash dumpster of a browser?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Man, I panicked at first because I have to use Edge at work. But this article clickbaited me, as uBlock origin lite is good enough for most people.

Still, screw Chrome, Edge, and Opera for being such dicks. It's always those three being the bottom tier browsers...

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

Ublock was already somewhat neutered on Chrome, and people didn’t seem to notice. They keep using it.

I’m just so cynical these days. It’s not like the Windows XP era, where people eventually get fed up with enshittification, and move.

Google won. Facebook won.

They have absolute control, basically.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›