this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024

651 points (99.1% liked)

News

23268 readers

4650 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

rjc@lemmy.world

Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world

dezmd@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

Blackbeard@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

jeffw@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

651

As folks freeze to death in Milwaukee, Ohio pastor charged for offering shelter (www.jsonline.com)

submitted 9 months ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/news@lemmy.world

111 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Whose responsibility is it to protect unhoused when it's freezing outside? An Ohio pastor opened his church to the homeless and was charged by city.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 125 points 9 months ago (7 children)

Ambiguous title. The pastor didn't ask for money from the freezing people. He took them in for free. The city then criminally charged him for violating zoning rules:

Chris Avell, pastor of Dad's Place in Bryan, Ohio, was arraigned in court last Thursday because he kept his church open 24/7 to provide warmth to the unhoused.

Ohio law prohibits residential use in first-floor buildings in a business district. Since the church is zoned as a Central Business, the building is restricted from allowing people to eat or sleep on the property.

[–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 158 points 9 months ago (4 children)

I dunno. It seems pretty clear that charged in this case means the government sicced the dogs on him for being a… checks notes… good Christian.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 101 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No wonder we have so many Bad Christians when the good ones are punished for their deeds.

This is what the gospel of Jesus meant that the life of a true Christian was the hardest.

The people who actually follow the gospel are generally vilified by the majority of Christians for making the rest of them look bad or something.

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago

If these people get angry at someone performing a good deed because that makes then look bad, they're going to hell.

If even the least absolutist christian sect, the church of England, teaches that as they did to me during my childhood, then those fuckers aren't even close to being Christian. They're just wearing a crucifix.

Fucking posers.

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 18 points 9 months ago

Hey now, since when does being a good Christian mean... checks notes... taking care of the oppressed, hungry & needy? Oh, well shit. :-P

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

I wonder if there’s a first amendment defense to be made here. The pastor was following his religious tenets by sheltering the poor in the church in their time of need.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 85 points 9 months ago (1 children)

criminally charged him for violating zoning rules

Well fuck'em.

If its criminal to do the right thing for your fellow humans, do crime.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 55 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

So by this logic church patrons would have to leave the premises to eat a snack, participate in a church meal, or even eat one of those wafers they sometimes hand out.

[–] TheLight@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Yup. Serve the body of Christ? Straight to jail. Your sermon is so boring someone dozes off, believe it or not, jail.

Of course, this doesn't really happen, through the magic of selective enforcement the only people getting the boot are those preventing the homeless from freezing to death, ruining the plans of the local administration.

load more comments (5 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 30 points 9 months ago (10 children)

Yet another evil created by zoning laws.

load more comments (10 replies)

[–] maness300@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago (2 children)

he building is restricted from allowing people to eat or sleep on the property.

Okay... so any business in the 'business district' is restricted from allowing people to eat or sleep on their property.

If I was a lawyer, I'd record people eating in their business district buildings and present that to the court right next to the law that says they're not allowed to do it.

I would fight tooth and nail to ensure whatever judicial overreach is screwing over poor people also screws over rich ones.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 16 points 9 months ago

No eating in the business district means no break rooms. And if Christian churches are in the business district, I’d imagine this means no communion wafers either.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] PapaStevesy@midwest.social 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If it's a business, why don't they pay taxes?

[–] Substance_P@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Yep, and what boundaries constitutes a church, synagogue, mosque or place of worship these days, and why is one religion tax free, yet a philosophical movement is not? To whom is respon$ible for making these institutions exempt of taxation? I for one would be a proud supporter of a church that actually upholds the tenants of biblical teachings, and also follows in the footsteps of those morals, but it's all just a sad sad part of modern day capitalism. This Pastor is a hero and should be heralded as such.

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 116 points 9 months ago (10 children)

And here I was told that the government doesn't need to take care of these things because churches and charities will pick up the slack...

load more comments (10 replies)

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 80 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children)

If this goes to a jury trial, everyone on that jury should fucking nullify.

If you don't know, jury nullification is an implicit property of jury trials. The court can't make you show your work or tell you that your verdict is wrong, so you can give any answer you want. That means if someone is up for something you think is bullshit, like helping the homeless or enjoying marijuana in their backyard, you can just say Not Guilty. The court can't do shit to you so long as you don't scream "NULLIFIED FUCKERS" as you're doing it.

That said, everyone involved in pushing these charges along should probably be voted out of office or run out of town. They're trying to kill people, just slowly and via exposure.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 37 points 9 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

deleted by creator

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Just to add, if you're selected for jury duty you should stop taking about it the day you receive the summons. Nobody needs to know what you think about nullification during that time and being in favor of it will get you removed from a bunch of courthouses. It's the jury version of saying "bomb" in an airport.

So just make sure you know your local laws about unanimous decision vs majority decision. In the first, you can just be the stick in the mud. Question everything. In the second you actually have to convince 4 other people to vote with you.

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (4 replies)

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 70 points 9 months ago

The unhoused are supposed to die quietly, he got in the way of that.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 62 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Some heartless bastard abusing the regulations. I'm sure there are good reasons for those regulations being in place, but if they are going to abuse people like this with them, something is very, very wrong. At the absolute least don't enforce those laws when the weather is deadly, and best pass a new ordinance suspending those laws/regulations during deadly weather. Too many of us have absolutely zero empathy for our fellow humans.

[–] AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure that those regulations are there for a good reason. I'm sure that those regulations are there because somebody wanted them and this is not an unintended consequence of them.

In fact I'm almost certain that the abusive anti-human use of this law is something dreamed up when the law was first penned to paper.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

They're violations of feeding/housing people in a business. There is not a good reason for them. Unless you consider protecting the prices of the housing market to be a good reason.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 56 points 9 months ago (21 children)

I hate this god damn country so fucking much.

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Don't lose heart - it's not all this way.

But yeah, we can't hold out faith in it any longer either :-(.

Fwiw, did you notice the silver lining? Pastor willing to go to jail (or whatever, I haven't read the details that closely yet, but let's presume - anyway it's likely true) rather than give up on his beliefs. He will die on this hill, so that they do not have to:-D. Yeah, fuck the system that made him do it, but still it's quite inspiring that people like him exist that will fight against it:-).

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (9 children)

It is. It throws me a bit sometimes. So used to seeing religion being nothing more than a tool of the powerful against the weak aligned with the government against us. The government makes our life hell, the shamans teach us that it can't be otherwise.

And then once in a rate while a religious leader puts themselves in harm's way for someone else and I don't know what to make of it. How can you spend 99,999 being awful and 1 day being good? Makes no sense.

load more comments (9 replies)

load more comments (20 replies)

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 48 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

As much as I despise religion, the problems of our country are not caused by religion. They are caused by conservatives.

Usually those conservatives are religious and wield their religion as a weapon, but the core problem has always been conservatives.

When a religious person is not conservative, their non-conservative behavior is punished by the conservatives.

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago (2 children)

While this is true, religion goes a long way in priming people to believe in total BS without questioning it or using critical thinking.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 35 points 9 months ago

When doing the right thing, or even doing right by your conscience, is a crime... you live in a place and time in which politicians haven't been tarred or feathered and run out of town on a rail in too long

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 30 points 9 months ago

The "pro-life" party strikes again

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I am really confused here. Look where Milwaukee is in relation to Ohio. (For non USians, it's under the second E in Milwaukee.)

It's 262 miles from Milwaukee to the Ohio state line by car.

[–] theluckyone@lemmy.world 51 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Pastor is in Ohio.Hears reports of people dying in Milwaukee. Pastor offers shelter to people in Ohio. Pastor is charged.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

Thank you.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 11 points 9 months ago

Because he should've offered shelter to people in Milwaukee /s

The situation is abhorrent though, some Kafkaesque level of reality

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

The newspaper is the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. They're contextualizing it for local readers.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] arin@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

Can they just charge the other pastors who 'play' with little boys?

load more comments