this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
236 points (99.6% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

8199 readers
517 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Danarchy@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 hour ago

That mountain?

Rock and stone

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 17 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

That’s a 10 year project if it wasn’t in a war zone.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 4 points 3 hours ago

What if, What if... and hear me out, use Nukes to Dig?

[–] LORDSMEGMA@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Just operation plowshare it in a few months

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

You get irradiated oil and you get irradiated oil and you get cancer

[–] PuddleOfKittens@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 hours ago
  1. Takes time, and probably more money than Iran would ask for in tolls.
  2. Still within drone range, so won't necessarily stop Iran
  3. Oil wells are within drone range, so even if shipping is solved Iran could still blow up oil production.
  4. Very expensive, especially if Iran folds in a month.
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Ah! Tunnel under the mountain and send the oil on submarines! Brilliant!

[–] Rug_Pisser@piefed.zip 1 points 1 hour ago
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 11 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago (2 children)
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 hours ago

This gets the NCD seal of approval: 🦭

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Damn it, I was hoping to comment "INB4 Project Plowshare," but nope!

I should've known better.

[–] istdaslol@feddit.org 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It would be a better solution to build a pipeline moving oil to SA‘s east coast but missing port infrastructure means it would take decades

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 40 minutes ago

plus a pipeline is easy to sabotage and destroyed with bombs or missiles.

[–] timestatic@feddit.org 2 points 5 hours ago

But image how many jobs this could create!! 🤯

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 2 points 6 hours ago

This is how shoplifting works in the large.