this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2026
319 points (98.8% liked)

News

38054 readers
2484 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Folks, it's not laziness, weakness, or entitlement. It's CAPITALISM. Private employment no longer pays enough to live on.

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Like, I’ll admit I got a bit lucky. I was able to buy a house at 25. The house was under 90k in a mid size town. That same house about a decade later is about 2x that price now. May salary hasn’t really doubled during that time, so I’d struggle to afford that house now.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

"People getting smarter"

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 26 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Im old enough to remember when the news said it was under 25. Then 30. And now 35.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I'm old enough to remember the last time they raised the minimum wage. (In case you're wondering, it was 2007. And it went from $5.15 to $7.25.)

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Average home buyer age in 2000: 35 years old

Average home buyer age in 2026: 56 years old

What I find horrifying about North America's housing situation (I'm in Canada) is that these boomers own these giant McMansions that are only possible to buy with boomer money. My generation doesn't want these giant houses, we can't afford them, we can't furnish them, and we certainly don't have the time or energy to clean all of that, but it's all that builders seem to build (they're the most profitable type of home for a given amount of materials and labour)

Right now they're all trying to downsize into the same homes first time homebuyers want and nobody's buying their gigantic McMansions (look at Florida right now. Nobody is buying and it seems like every house is for sale right now)

Once enough of them can't sell or straight up die (and their kids can't sell) it crashes the entire market permanently. All of these houses get repriced to what they actually should be (good) but it collapses the entire fake money system which is based on inflated house prices (my home country's economy is basically just real-estate speculation)

And of course the group that will be fucked over the most are the young people. It's never the profiteering home owners who caused this whole situation in the first place...

There's also the issue of municipalities being desperately reliant on inflated valuations for housing to get enough property tax. A big enough crash is going to cause towns and cities to run out of money...

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

currently its mostly tech people at those ages 35-40+ are home owners, followed by STEM grad holders who are in-demand fields including health, but mostly the indemand specific health industries. every other stem holder aint getting an income if they can get the job even, to buy a house.

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's the K shaped economy. What we're seeing right now is the bottom falling out of the 60-70th percentile. I'm hearing of a massive housing correction that should be happening this year or next.

FYI they changed delinquency rules so now they offer homeowners "pay me something and the difference is added to the back of your mortgage" that way it doesn't report in the delinquencies reports. 60% of those fail within a year but it still manages to avoid showing up in the data... There's lots more... Listing sites adding the showroom to real estate websites to represent 300 units, that way they maintain the illusion of scarcity.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

35 if you are in tech or a high paying MD/nursing job. every other stem is not possible, let alone jobs are not there.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 127 points 3 days ago (15 children)

A third of young adults between the ages of 25 and 35 – 25.2 million people – were living with their parents in 2025. Of those, 70% had jobs, and many held college degrees, highlighting that the increase in at-home living stems from high housing costs rather than labor market conditions.

The national median asking rent is 18% higher than pre-pandemic levels, while the national median home listing price is 34% higher, according to data from the real estate company.

“Every adult still in a childhood bedroom is a household not formed, a lease unsigned, a starter home unpurchased,” said Hannah Jones, a senior economist at Realtor.com.

There it is. The pearl clutching over capitalism. They aren't spending money on buying starter homes!!

Honestly, multi-generational living can be really beneficial. Just not for capitalists.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 52 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I grew up in a house with my grandmother, and she was an incredible boon to my parents in taking care of us, plus she stayed surrounded by people who loved her and knew how to care for her (non-technically, things like helping her dress and use the bathroom).

So our family forwent paying for childcare, elder care, and an entire extra household of space, things, and utilities, plus we got the social benefits of having very young and old people together (grounds the young people and teaches them to be gentle while keeping the old people rooted in a community), all for the low price of inter generational living.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

thats the way with asian and hispanic families

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

It's so staggering to remember that for a very long time in human history, something like this was the norm. Now culture often tries to cast this as some kind of weird deviation.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That sounds like a really lovely set up

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

It was great. I’m a younger millennial who grew up with someone in my household who remembered WWI starting (she had my mom late, and then my mom had me late), which exposed me to a lot of history that most people my age didn’t get.

She was a teenager when the depression began, and because she was the oldest of 14 kids, her parents sent her to a convent to take over caring for her; she was one of the few women of her generation to get a master’s degree; she was living at the base on Pearl Harbor when it was attacked; and she rented out a room in her house to several of the first black students at the university where she taught, because no one else would rent to them. That’s a wild life story.

Unfortunately, I didn’t think about it when I had the chance, but I really regret not recording a set of interviews with her.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

and blackstone is owning EMPTY houses, not blackrock apparently. all due to airbnb, and similar services.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Multigeneration households are great if they actually plan for it. Starting a family in a house thats already servicing a full family can be difficult and many of them probably can't afford to upsize to a more reasonably sized household if needed. Multigeneration living alone still wouldn't fix the housing crisis but it could relieve some pressure and could be a more affordable option for those able to do it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"A starter home unpurchased"

When have "starter homes" been a thing in recent history?! LMAO. In a lot of places everything is a very specific "single family" size starting at like "low 400s" all the way to a million.

One would have to look for such a place "with good bones", because it's not the most profitable development type anymore, and even if they did make them, new constructions are hastily thrown together as cheaply as possible before being covered with a pretty facade.

They fall apart quick, because their primary purpose is to sell.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

starter homes in 70-90s year, and only up till 2004 in my area. now its just a "luxury prices" for a mediocre starting home.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Honestly, multi-generational living can be really beneficial. Just not for capitalists.

Indeed. I mean, I'm assuming most of these people are doing this involuntarily, but if we are doing real talk, the idea of the single-family unit that can be plucked up and plopped down anywhere in the country is something that is mostly in service of capitalism, not necessarily for happiness of the individual, non-atomic-family cohesion, etc.

It seems like nearly all of the culture casts anyone that doesn't leave their parents' home by the end of high school or at the end of college as being utter failures and losers, and not worthy of romantic partners, or worthy of really any respect and so on. How much of this is orchestrated is hard to really say, but Hollywood certainly doesn't help.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (16 children)

Sounds like parents left their children a shit world to grow into.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

its the boomers in congress, corps like blackstone, or other real estate vultures. and white NIMBY areas.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 58 points 3 days ago (3 children)

You know what else is at an all time high?

Corporate ownership of homes. Funny, huh?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 38 points 3 days ago (2 children)

And the mortgages are even higher.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 30 points 3 days ago

I bought my first house with my mom. She couldn't afford to buy one on her own and I couldn't either. US is fucked. Eat the Rich and build homes form their bones.

[–] Beth@piefed.social 21 points 3 days ago

I expect my children to stay with me forever. Then they can have the house.

load more comments
view more: next ›