this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2026
396 points (98.8% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

16996 readers
521 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] borQue@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

how can this be possible!? it almost looks like they printed an enormeous amount of money extra! this cant be true, else devaluation of the dollar would be immense! (/cynical)

[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Well at least elon is no longer a trillionaire.

[–] Datz@szmer.info 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

We had a wealth gap between the poor and rich, and now we're getting a wealth gap between the rich and super rich?

[–] Beeen132@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago

It's called fucking rich, since nothing about it is super...

[–] saimen@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago

More like between the extremely super duper rich and the one even absurdely unbelievable massively hyper cyper more rich.

[–] vapordays@leminal.space 4 points 1 day ago

Always has been

[–] vane@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It all depends on people who are working in their companies. If they stop working in their companies the wealth will fade away.

[–] TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is the fucking hilarious part of inflation.

Yeah. There’s more money. And nobody has it except a handful of scum.

[–] vapordays@leminal.space 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"Libertarians" and BaSiC eCoNoMiCs guys blame inflation on "printing money," but they don't like to talk about who the printed money went to, which is the real problem. Wall Street and big corporate was bailed out in 2008, that's where the expanded money supply was concentrated into.

[–] RosaLuxemburgsGhost@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

To continue…and liberals don’t like to talk about how capitalism requires the theft of wealth from the working class via surplus value and that in order to get rid of this class subjugation and oppression we need to get rid of the system that breeds it - capitalism. The workers need to take back the very thing that is oppressing them - the means of production/private property. When in private hands it benefits the private individuals. When in the hands of the working class - it benefits all….and the formerly bourgeois class are absorbed into the working class (aka there are no more classes)….which is the thing they fear most. This is why they teach you to parrot anti-communist propaganda through all of their propaganda channels.

[–] justaman123@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The problem still seems to be governance. Like even in that system some of the workers are involved in regulating the infrastructure of production and that necessarily means that one person is telling a lot of people what they can and can't do. We don't really have a way to do this that doesn't involve hierarchy. And our little monkey brains love a hierarchy.

So that's the real problem of communism. Because otherwise it is a better system and it should beat capitalism. Unfortunately because capitalism is better at concentrating resources into fewer hands it's better at defending itself from fairer systems.

Also the US having had little physical damage after ww2 meant that the capitalist had a much better base from which to perpetuate itself.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago

A lifetime ago I heard that "inflation is good actually, because it allows for economic mobility" as in people without a lot of money get more of the "new" money and so get to join the "middle class" (not a real class, but an income bracket).

Turns out the rich plugged up that little leak in tiny bit of wealth that actually did trickle down.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

how is dell in the top 5? Seriously though only buffet at least has the financial accumen to actually be there. Decades of lowering taxes has made it so that even if you lose bilions like musk did you still won't lose your fortune. Its barely a rounding curve for him.

how is dell in the top 5?

Market manipulation.

Trump "truthed" (🤮) out of nowhere that everyone should buy a Dell, and the market value skyrocketed.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 59 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] vapordays@leminal.space 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It works incredibly well (so far), just not for most people

[–] justaman123@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

For the top 2000 people or so the world is a resort, the rest of us are just staff

[–] GMac@feddit.org 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Sorry that it's a youtube link, but this is a brilliant analysis from Gary Stevenson with pretty sobering conclusions... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gd0gmxd36FI

Basically at this point the continyed concentration of wealth is increasing exponentially as a logical inevitability.

We need wealth taxes, breakup of monopolies and a far larger willingness of the population to boycot companies that prioritise short term growth and unethical business practices over the delivery of effective, repairable products and honest services for fair prices.

[–] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

a far larger willingness of the population to boycot companies that prioritise short term growth and unethical business practices over the delivery of effective, repairable products and honest services for fair prices.

yeah but gay hockey though

/s

[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 46 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Nah the wealthiest people aren't on the list, and they are much wealthier than any of these guys. The family of Saud is way up there but keep most of their wealth hidden.

[–] justaman123@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah I suspect this doesn't account for "old money" at all. That class of people is so entrenched they own such foundational layers of society that nothing touches them at all. If anyone knew what they owned it could be taxed away from them.

[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Security through obscurity is a very valuable lesson. It's the king who rules in public who gets his head chopped off. This is why some find these more public personas to be placeholders for the real movers and shakers. If one stays out of the limelight they can weather changes and maintain control.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They're a big family though, none of which have more than Musk INDIVIDUALLY.

You'd be right about Putin and other despots with de facto one person ownership of entire countries worth of wealth and resources, though.

[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Yes if you think what they report officially is correct. Most everyone is aware they only report a small fraction of their wealth. Musk is by far not the first trillionair, he is the first one publicly.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Most everyone is aware

Evidently not true if you have to insist on it being true.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 23 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Don't forget Bezos had a 2 for 1 split when he got divorced.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The wealth gap was already so heinously egregious in 2016 too.

[–] justaman123@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Remember occupy wallstreet? The wealth inequality in 2006-2007 was so bad there were tons of videos going around exposing with easily verifiable information about just how much more money the 1 percent had than everyone else. Then the recession happened and then suddenly when you went back to look at that information it had been cleaned up to make it look like the 1 percent didn't really own that much more. I think it was right around the time that Google dropped "don't be evil"

[–] Kaligalis@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago

Looks like buying Twitter was a great investment. Being able to change the outcome of an election definitely beats ad revenue.

[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I wonder what would happen if we just stopped printing money. Told the fed to just "turn off the tap" so to speak. I'd love to hear the conversation with their accountant: "WHAT DO YOU MEAN '[I] HAVE ALL THE MONEY!?!!?'"

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's not how economy works

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 1 points 16 hours ago

If the entire world just stopped working for a few weeks it might.

[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 0 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

I WONDER What would happen if we stopped printing money. Explore the idea ANYWAY. Ever hear the saying "It's so crazy it just might work?"

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

More like 5 biggest criminals

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Pulling more Luigis could stop them.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 days ago

You'd have to create a threat linked to the money, so that Luigis went after anyone who kept their inheritance or dared to keep the wealth consolidated.

Eventually, someone would disseminate the money to survive.

On a related note, someone needs to hunt down private equity brokers and unethical venture capitalists the way Nazi hunters went after escaped Nazi officers after WWII, either to Luigi them or to bring them to international tribunal. Although, since nations can be influenced by ultra-wealthy oligarchs, it might not be possible to form such a tribunal. And that brings us back to the frontier justice of goomba-stomping plumbers.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 13 points 2 days ago

!twnw@fedia.io their wealth must be taxed. It's not even an issue of "can we survive without a wealth tax" but "how long". These people are gluttons and will never stop hoarding.

[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Way to hang in there Mr bezos

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Michael Dell charting again is the most hilarious part.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›