this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
90 points (90.2% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

2108 readers
63 users here now

A community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.

Rules:

  1. Be civil.
  2. Please do not link to pirated content.
  3. No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
  4. Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ehhhh.... It's high budget for sure, but I'm just not convinced live action avatar will ever be good. They could've remastered the cartoon with a fraction of the budget.

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cap@lemm.ee 19 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Not sure how they can top the original movie. Why try to do better then a masterpiece?

[–] kowcop@aussie.zone 6 points 9 months ago

Why does Hollywood continue to remake movies? because they didn’t ruin it the first time

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 1 points 9 months ago

The Water of the Ocean.

4 different ways to pronounce Avatar.

Truly a masterpiece.

[–] neatchee@lemm.ee 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm okay with this, but I also was okay with cowboy bebop live action lol

I hope everyone remembers that we don't need a copy of the original animation. We already have the original animation and trying to copy it in another medium usually is just inferior in every way

Let this be a new thing, an opportunity for a new audience to be reached with a new thing. I can always go back and watch the animation whenever I want.

[–] reversebananimals@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If you want something new, make something new. Otherwise this is just a marketing product repackaging peoples childhoods and trying to sell it back to them.

[–] neatchee@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I don't care? If it's fun, and more people get to enjoy it, why is that bad? Let them play again in the same sandbox. It's bad when an industry becomes too reliant on that type of media, and it's bad when the content is, you know, bad, like the movie. But if it's good content then why get a bug in your ass over some economic principle?

There's room in the world for all of these things. You can comment on the industry trend without shitting on a specific product that isn't even out yet

[–] RagingHungryPanda@lemm.ee 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 1 points 9 months ago

They didn't ruin One Piece so I'll give them a shot.

[–] Blaze@discuss.online 10 points 9 months ago

Definitely agree with you. If anything, that trailer just made me want to watch the original show again!

[–] GlitterInfection@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, I think this looks well done and I'm excited to watch it! It may not be the original and it may be minorly unnecessary, but it looks done with love and reverence.

It will reach a new audience who wouldn't watch the original because it's a cartoon, and that's great!

[–] FilthyHookerSpit@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I lost hope when the original creators left the project because it didn't respect their vision.

[–] GlitterInfection@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I regained my hope when I found out that they left, not actually because of creative differences, but because they were given a ton of money to create a new studio for Nickelodeon to create new Avatar content.

It's one of those rare cases where everyone is a winner!

[–] FilthyHookerSpit@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)
[–] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Racebending again?

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Except there never was any word im indicating that it didnt respect their vision. The reason for why they left is still not publicly known.

[–] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The combat seems a lot more dynamic than Shyamalan's take, so that's something at least.

[–] bibliotectress@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Right? I'm cautiously optimistic. The fire bending looked really cool, and it seems like they kept Sokka's dry quippiness.

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

They mostly have the look down. The only one that looks out of place is King Bumi, as he definitely just looks like a young guy in old man makeup. But we didn’t get to see much.

The other worry is the acting and storytelling. Some of the line delivery seems a bit wooden, and it’s tough to see if it will come close to the humor and heart of the original.

Pretty clear they are killing The Great Divide, Bato of the Water Tribe (except for June), and combining The Northern Air Temple somehow into Omashu. They also seem to be adding the air nomad genocide and moving The Cave of Two Lovers to season 1. It also looks like they are going to try and flesh out Zuko’s relationship with Azula and Ozai more

At least they know how to say Aang and the bending doesn’t look stupid.

[–] PositiveControl@feddit.it 5 points 9 months ago

Aaaw, that theme music always gets me. I'm kinda intrigued, I love the opportunity to see again these characters and to stay with them for some more time, but also I don't know if I should really put my trust on Netflix

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

Nice, I don't have to crosspost it from !avatar@lemmy.world to here.

Some of the scenes in this trailer are remarkably close to the animated series. The heart seems to be in there. Whether it works as a whole package will need to be seen...

[–] HowRu68@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I hope they have some new story telling.

[–] Blaze@discuss.online 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't seem like it, looks pretty canon

[–] HowRu68@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

looks pretty canon.

Yes appears so when I read the description.

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

My 8yo gave her seal of approval after seeing Aang in Avatar state, saying, 'this looks a lot better than that other dumb movie we watched long back (the avatar state eyes on that movie was super weird)'

For reference:

vs

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I'm just glad they're pronouncing "Aang" correctly

[–] Spaghetti_Hitchens@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It pronounced like "Aang" right?

[–] ech@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

"Ay-ang? It's there an Ay-ang here today?"

[–] wjrii@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

Sounds like they specifically lingered on it a couple of times. This one looks like it's going to just kind of be a compressed version of the cartoon, which could be a lot worse, as we all know. Hopefully it's respectful and mostly consistent, and people who find they just need to know more can go back and watch the Nick series. Even if that leaves it sort of "slight" for those already invested, it will have value. Fingers crossed.

I mean, it looks better than the last attempt at a live action avatar. I'm not optimistic though.

[–] GrammatonCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I wish they would stop. I'm not even an Avatar fan, but I can see what they're doing here. They're Dragonballing it.

[–] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Fraction of the budget? Depends on how high of quality they would remaster it. If it would be a high quality remake than an animation could easily cost 500k to a 1 million a minute. And remaking it to the quality level of something like the Dragon Prince would be a waste of effort since it would only look slightly better.