this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
342 points (99.7% liked)

News

38239 readers
2147 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Can the onion do to him what they did to that other fuckface?

[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 53 points 3 days ago

Yeah, like trump ever pays a bill

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 44 points 3 days ago (1 children)

C'mon donny, pay up. You've got so much pocket grift, Shirley $5m is nothing to you.

[–] Fribbizz@feddit.org 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't think it's about being able to afford it. More that he is loath to let her have anything at all on principle.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago

For me it more about the fact that if a court found that you or I were guilty and had to pay a fine, we'd have no choice but to pay that fine. The law has to apply to everyone, equally.

[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 36 points 3 days ago

"Must"? Yeah right. If he's not going to get locked up for not paying he'll just keep not paying.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

E. Jean should have said..."Remove the tarp and I'll knock off $250,000.00."

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Spoiler alert: he won’t pay…

[–] littlewonder@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

It's in escrow so it's not up to Trump this time.

[–] prenatal_confusion@feddit.org 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How can he avoid it now? He can just not pay and nobody would do anything but legally he is out of recourse, no?

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm guessing if it comes down to it the court could order banks with accounts in Trump's name to make the payments

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Others have said the money is in an escrow account, but if that weren't the case, the court can also essentially order his physical property to be seized up to the value owed. Like, literally walk into mar-a-lago and start taking chairs and paintings and shit.

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He makes way more than that in any of his daily scams.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Came here to say this.

Even if he were to just use the interest from a HYSA on the 2 billion he made in 2025, if I did the math properly, he could make 5 million in 28 days.

It's just him being prideful and petty to fight this. The money means next to nothing to him.

[–] Corvidae@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

$5 million shouldn't be a problem for him since the reported $1-2 billion he reportedly earned with crypto scams.

2.2 billion in the first year

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 14 points 3 days ago

According to Glen Kirshner, Trump defamed Carroll again when he responded to this story. He said he didn't know her, which is apparently the same thing he said before and already lost a defamation lawsuit over.

[–] stefenauris@pawb.social 14 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Kind of sad that sexually abusing someone is only "worth" $5 million. I feel like that's not enough to compensate someone for something so horrible. Especially now that it has global attention

[–] binux@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If the penalty for a crime is a fine, then that law only exists for the lower class.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Agreed. Something like this would be the financial end for most people. The penalty for Donvict should be set accordingly.

[–] bridgeburner@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

We really need wealth-based percentage fines.

[–] musicalphysics@discuss.online 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The total judgment is like $83 million. This is just part.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There should be some extra amount added for inflation, for late fees, for having her name plastered all over headlines, and so on.

Good news then, the award does earn interest while under appeal. Trump had to post a bond for the award plus interest accounting for appeal time. I don’t remember exactly how long they prepaid. The award doesn’t include extra for the other stuff though.

I get it and I absolutely agree with you. He and his ilk should be rotting behind bars. But as someone who was sexually abused and still has nightmares years and years later, I'd gladly take that $5 million instead of absolutely nothing but permanent trauma.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

.00125 of the wealth trump has grifted since he took office.

[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

that photo tho

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Isn't it technically that he has already paid, and the escrow account must now transfer the money to her?