this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
201 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30531 readers
3451 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Trump administration has greenlit Saudi Arabia's nuclear enrichment project, but with no safeguards in place to prevent the development of a bomb, CNN reported on Friday.

The draft deal, viewed by the news outlet, showed Washington's support for Riyadh’s civilian nuclear programme is still awaiting President Donald Trump’s signature, despite US-Saudi negotiations concluding in October.

Unnamed officials cited in the story indicated that the documents, which include the mandatory "123 agreement" and safeguards protocols, have not yet been sent to Congress, potentially for fear of bipartisan pushback.

Seems to run counter to enacted law. Also, how much you want to bet there will be chicinery with the upcoming government shutdown will provide cloak and cover for this.

Crazy thought: this is all blackmail because Saudi Arabia got a copy of the Epstein files.

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 5 points 1 day ago

Don't worry guys, I'm sure this Prince Bonesaw guy is totally aboveboard.

[–] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So... We're bombing one authoritarian theocracy to stop it from getting nukes but cheering on another one to do the same. Man, winning has never felt this confusing 😵‍💫

No but you see, the Saudis are (mostly) on the side of the West's favorite fascist apartheid state and that makes them the GOOD guys who must be allowed to do everything they want with impunity!

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Don't forget our ally, the authoritarian theocracy that already has nukes. All of Israel's neighbors understand that nukes are the only thing that keeps Israeli fighter jets out of your country.

Ironically, a nuclear armed Iran and Saudi Arabia may lead to more stability in the region by being a check on Israeli (and US) aggression.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's great. Really fabulous. Throw it over there on the pile of other irreversibly harmful stuff Trump has done, either for his own glory, or because someone tricked him, and that he won't be around to see the consequences of.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Trump has done, either for his own glory, or because someone tricked him,

Don't forget blackmailed. The Saudis probably have a full and unredacted copy of the Epstein files

Does that even matter? Anyone with a brain already knows that Donald Trump and his whole cohort is guilty of pretty much everything in those files.

[–] AmbientDread@piefed.social 13 points 2 days ago

Sure. Let's give a bonesaw wielding inbred monarchy who's citizens, or should I say subjects, perpetrated 9-11 on our country the chance to have nukes. Great plan. I'm sure some cronies of Pump and Dump Rump will be raking in the dough.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Wild. I genuinely would trust Iran more than Saudi Arabia or Israel at this point.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Iran started their nuclear program in the 60s. They have been enriching for decades and yet no bomb despite Israel and the US claiming a bomb is just weeks away for decades.

So yeah, Iran has a pretty good track record when it comes to nuclear weapons. They literally agreed to a non-proliferation deal and Trump ripped it up because it had Obama's signature on it.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org -1 points 2 days ago (4 children)

In part justifiable due to the said behavior in africa but your trust in Iran is misguided at best.

They are routinely using terrorism and supporting Russia and authocraths.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 11 points 2 days ago

They are routinely using terrorism and supporting Russia and authocraths.

I mean, not really? Neither Iran nor its most prominent proxies (Hamas excluded) use terrorism on a regular basis; Western media just loves calling all anti-Western violent dissent terrorism. As for supporting Russia, I mean, it's not Russia that sanctioned them to death. That one is a pure self-own by the West; Iran has made it clear multiple times that it doesn't like the status quo but it needs to trade with someone. If America and co. weren't so committed to having Iran as a vassal state those Shahed drones could've been going to Ukraine instead. Iran has many skeletons in its closet (Assad being the most obvious), but not these. Finally, which autocrats?

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

And the Saudis aren't? I seem to remember the Saudis doing a really big terrorism at least once.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The 9/11 stuff or the Washington Post/Khashoggi stuff?

Don't forget they are one of the primary backers of ISIS and ISIL.

[–] _chris@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

So is the United States.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

more

..when the listed options are bone-saw kingdom or the genocidal ethnostate

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

fucking sold us out; yet again and again

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So Republicans have now greenlit a theocratic muslim, jihadist sponsoring regime, to have nukes.

How much you wanna bet these "god fearing" Christians on the right who cheer Palestinian and IRA ian civilian deaths will conveniently turn a blind eye to this news?

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

How much you wanna bet these “god fearing” Christians on the right who cheer Palestinian and IRA ian civilian deaths will conveniently turn a blind eye to this news?

Haven't you heard? Their shared belief that Iran and people with left wing ideology are he root of all evil makes Saudi Arabia a friend of the West's favorite fascist apartheid regime and therefore the GOOD guys who must be placated under all circumstances!

Also, they probably gave everyone in the Trump kakistocracy a shitload of bribes and/or have blackmail material on them.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago

Pay to play in the u s of a.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

This is the first step in the eventual nuclear device detonated in NY.

[–] unitedwithme@lemmy.today 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm sorry, how does the US even have a say in who gets to do what?! Guess I should read the article.

Same thought. Isn't there some International Atomic Something Something..? I guess, it's another case of "FCC allows Billions of satellites, because if Eagleland."

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I could see your crazy thought as potentially not so crazy. I have also had the thought that all the politicians siding with isreal are in the files and isreal has the videos. It wouldn't surprise me if other countries had them.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I think I heard that there had been some breach of the Epstein files back in like 2023 or something (?) and I recall people saying ",I bet it was anonymous and they are going to release it all".

But that never happened.

I did not think it was Anonymous. I assumed it was some other country and they would hold it as blackmail.

There would be no release.

Once it's out there, it can't be used anymore.

I also thought the same about the doj. They won't release files on the politicians they are controlling. Cause then trump can't control them.

I dont think they are "protecting" these men so much as they are protecting their blackmail material.

Trump has no loyalty. Only keeps people for their usefulness to him.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/foreign-hacker-2023-compromised-epstein-files-held-by-fbi-source-documents-show-2026-03-11/

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

blackmailing someone when the same blackmail exists for the blackmailer feels so blackmail loans

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Mexican standoff situation.

But the thing is. So far no one has held Trump accountable for anything. So he probably thinks that will hold.

Art of the deal, ladies and gentlemen!