this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2026
800 points (98.4% liked)

Flippanarchy

2700 readers
439 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Cross-posted from "No, it's not 'normal'." by @DougHolland@lemmy.world in !aiop@lemmy.world


top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

This is true, but it's not anarchistic.

[–] Nobody@anarchist.nexus 55 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We’re running hunter gatherer hardware with intense survival instincts designed to protect us from getting eaten by sabretooth tigers in the age of anxiety.

[–] SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today 17 points 2 weeks ago

We pay in sabertooth tigers for sabertooth tigers, and hey, your sabertooth tiger boss would like to show you a sabertooth tiger, just scroll down on your mobile sabertooth tiger, skip a few sabertooth tigers, click the tiger, and then you should see a sabertooth tiger.

And do not sleep. There are tigers.

[–] GhostFace@lemmy.today 53 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Say it louder please.

There's 8 billion people on this earth and the competition is getting really tiring. It's not even merit based any more and I'm not sure when it last was.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 14 points 2 weeks ago (17 children)

Well, there's the issue, human lives have been cheapened way too much.

Humans need to be so precious, that people beg for babies again.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 weeks ago

Depending on how you define merit, it never was.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Don't you ever think, how is it possible most people does not realise how much better life could be? How good we all could be living right now.

[–] Ophrys@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 weeks ago

It drives me insane tbh

[–] mangobanana@discuss.online 7 points 2 weeks ago

But then how could they feel superior over those "lessor thans" especially race related issues. I swear we would have such a better life of the whites in power were not doing everything they could to keep poc down

[–] motruck@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 weeks ago

This is why history repeats itself. New generations grow up, just like you did, thinking all this shit has been this way forever and it is just how it is. It is hard as a human to get perspective around that. So the cycle continues.

[–] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago

Constant competition is exhausting. We should cooperate more.

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It is normal. Its just not entirely in alignment with biology. This entire system requires constant upkeep to compensate for that misalignment. I want to be on a beach eating fruit from the trees and fucking and dancing and signing all day. Unfortunately, I need to pay another human for the right to exist in whatever space I'm currently occupying so they don't commit violence against me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Alpha71@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dewey_mcbrewster@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (11 children)

I beg to differ.

An anthropologist should know about food scarcity. For thousands of years the family unit, tribe or village was under extreme competition from neighboring people and animals for resources.

There is a video from cameras on monkeys. They literally spend their whole day looking for food. Or in other words, every waking hour is spent in the pursuit of sustenance. Pre-tractor man was the same. Without modern capitalist agriculture you would be toiling on the farm tending to sheep, chickens, plowing fields, milking cows and all the myriad of tasks needed to fulfill the food groups you so nonchalantly stuff your face with. It be non-stop work for all the variety you currently take for granted.

The world, with low life-expectancies, was hazardous with no medicines, protections from the weather or modern law. Which i think brings a bit of stress when a festering carbuncle could mean your death. But thanks to innovation, it can now be easily cured by companies who seek monetary reward. I’ll take this normal over the other one.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 39 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You could have agriculture without modern capitalism.

We have people who treat Eve online optimization like a full time job for example. If their needs were met, I think they’d work happily on optimizing tractor schedules and crop rotation plans

I would probably do my job for free if I didn’t have to think about retirement and keeping my house and filling my belly. I just like what I do and I find it rewarding. The problem is still resource allocation.

No, I don’t think centralizing power and central planning will solve this either, I’m just saying people will be productive even without money.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I would probably start 30 unfinished projects.

[–] sunnie@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

I’ve learned that some people hate starting projects but really like taking something that’s already been planned out and working it out to completion.

Made me feel better about getting my pleasure from planning and starting projects then losing interest once things started coming together.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 24 points 2 weeks ago

You're severely underestimating the emiseration that happened under capitalism. Yes, peasant work is hard work. But living standards for the proletariat plummeted during the industrial revolution. Peasants didn't have 14 hour shifts in the factories.

And you conflate technological progress with capitalism.

Also: if your environment can sustain a hunter-gatherer mode of production, you actually have quite a lot of leisure time.

[–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Nobody cares if you beg to differ if your examples are all about farming. Farming was historically a last resort when you couldn’t live off the land by foraging and hunting. It was more common in less fruitful locations. Read some anthropology before you speak on it. Or learn more about modern agriculture and how shitty its returns are for the investment. Which is unsurprising considering modern agriculture is just shoving 3-5 crops in a bunch of places where they don’t want to grow and praying there’s enough nitrogen in the soil this year.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Serfs also had to pay like 2/3 of their produce to their lords. When was the last time, humanity really had to struggle for food (and not because they had to enable a wasteful upper class)? Before we settled down, invented agriculture?

[–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

Because that’s the foundation of a civilization? When humanity was able to produce more per farmer than they could eat is when society flourished the most. That allows other people to live off the farmer’s back and do other things. That might sound like they were taking advantage of them, but if Pythagoras and Archimedes and everyone else had to spent their days in the field, we wouldn’t have all that we do now. And I’m sure the farmers didn’t mind when those non-farmers came up with the tractor.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

The invention of agriculture didn’t end the struggle for food. Early agriculture was a much harder way of life than hunting and gathering at the time. The first agriculturist peoples were severely malnourished compared to their h-g neighbours. They had a very poor diet of limited variety, and a lot less available meat.

Early agriculturists were also easy pickings for hunter gatherers to raid their food stores and plunder everything. Between the poor soil, poor variety of crops, poor nutrition and low protein, infestations of mould and vermin, and constant attacks by raiders, life for these folks was an extreme struggle.

Looking at that situation, it should be a lot easier to see why agriculturalist societies soon developed militaries and became warlike. And why local lords demanding 2/3 of your produce was a fair trade for having a military that would drive its enemies hundreds of miles away from your farm.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago

This is true, but I think that it might also be true that capitalism has gone a bit overboard lately.

And I live in the EU!

[–] untorquer@quokk.au 3 points 2 weeks ago

Dr. Agro doesn't reference ancient history. Her work centers contemporary cultures as well as those historically concurrent with capitalism. E.g. within those few hundred years.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Hikermick@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)
[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 1 points 17 hours ago

medieval peasant sustenance farmers worked a lot less than us

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›