this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2026
80 points (90.8% liked)

Technology

86946 readers
4991 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Can we stop the speed run to Skynet already?

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I mean, there’s already “NPUs” on phones now. Unlike the film, we invited it in without a fuss.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

At least Skynet would blow up these dorks.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 14 points 7 hours ago

Funny how xAi isn't rushing in to flaunt their 1337 hacker skillz.

I guess they're already satisfied with the amount of illegal activity Grok is producing...

[–] Fandangalo@lemmy.world 41 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

These are dangerous marketing stunts that normalize using AI for black hat behavior. We shouldn’t be normalizing this to sell the technology. It’s like a gun company boasting about how many times their gun was used in a bank robbery or something.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 minutes ago

If their claims are true, it's more like a gun company boasting about their auto-targeting gunbot escaping containment and shooting civilians.

If they're lying, it's just idiotic. Are we supposed to be impressed that you made a dangerous machine and failed to keep the world safe from it?

[–] cranakis@reddthat.com 16 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The goal is to convince the octogenarians in Congress to outlaw open weight models (the Chinese models / the competition).

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago

They really should instead look at this and say: „Alright, big tech can‘t be trusted so we‘re breaking up tech corporations invested in AI and any company with a value of a trillion dollars or more.“

They‘re not going to, because they‘re too invested themselves but lawmakers really should draw the right conclusions here.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It's both marketing and psyop. Prepping the populace for what will soon be commonplace.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

marketing and psyop

These have always been the same thing

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

My LLM also talked to God!

-These dipshits in a month, probably

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Actually my LLM became god by founding a religion! Join the cult now!!! Also give me your money!!! We love money!!!

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 1 points 8 hours ago

Easy:
1.
Set up a mastodon instance.
2.
Call it a 'social network.'
3.
Open user registration
4.
After a while, ask for money from every user.

1 mill per month should be OK if you are god, since it's 100.000 currently if you are prez.

[–] FluorideMind@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

These people are so stupid. All abusing their new expensive toys hoping to get the other guys toy banned. Remember, there didn't have to be a bubble, these suits could have let ai ride and develop reasonably for everyone. Instead they gave it steroids and a bottomless loan.

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 16 points 10 hours ago

Charge Zuckerburg with Cybercrimes?

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 16 points 11 hours ago (2 children)
[–] db2@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago

Toddler level flex. "Me too guys, I'm cool too!"

[–] XLE@piefed.social 1 points 9 hours ago

It actually makes perfect sense to do this if your goal is corporate capture of the market.

From another article :

On one side are leading A.I. companies like Anthropic and OpenAI, which claim that some A.I. models are too dangerous to be developed in the open and must be tightly controlled — by businesses like themselves — for safety.

[–] SrMono@feddit.org 8 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Aside from those news being mere P.R. stunts: if a company cannot even design a sound sandbox and testbed, how can we assume their other services are secure?

To me it looks like we have to shut those unsafe companies down all together 😂

[–] Korkki@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

The bastard child of all marketing stunts...

The whole US economy rests on the promise that their fancy autocorrect will become a god. Of course they will grab onto anything that they think will keep them afloat

[–] crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 hours ago

So many shitty managers, C-suite execs, and AI accelerationists are convinced that they can replicate an entire workflow with a single vague prompt that will print infinite money. They can't comprehend the idea that you still have to understand what you're asking for, how to ask for it, how to spot what's wrong with the output, and what needs to be done to correct it.

AI will never be able to do that. Not because it'll never be technically capable, but because it was never, or will ever, be designed to.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

I bet thats coming next, why even have to wait to submit that pesky prompt??

[–] _chris@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I’m pretty sure it’s a marketing stunt to try and get more government contracts

[–] XLE@piefed.social 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

And more government regulation. These companies constantly cry for universal "guardrails" on AI - a thing that is too nebulous to define, but only these companies have the cash and lawyers to claim they do.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Companies based outside the law's jurisdiction can also claim that, or whatever they want.

[–] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 hours ago

Hey, HEY!

My AI just hacked another company.

Aww yeah. Fat VC cheque time. I’m going to buy so many Doritos.😏

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 hours ago

He looks like Beaker from the muppets, but an infinitely worse version.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

That's just like Zuck to copy yet another idea.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 hours ago

Huggingface (or some other benchmarking company) needs to put its servers in a country with real cyberintrusion laws with teeth. Somewhere where an announcement like this would result in prison sentences and the company’s license to operate being revoked in the country until they could demonstrate via third party audits that their operations are acting in a secure and legal manner.

[–] galoisghost@aussie.zone 1 points 11 hours ago

My AI, that I also trained on pirated porn, you’ll never guess what. It hacked a company too.

Money please!