this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2026
498 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

87240 readers
3566 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] danielfm123@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

More adds and less money for creators.... Where is money going? We all know.

[–] DaleGribble88@programming.dev 14 points 1 day ago

On the flip side, I am genuinely curious how much storage and processing time all the AI slop being uploaded is costing them. Some of that stuff is hours long, and like most videos on YouTube, most people aren't watching it.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why do so many people abbreviate adverts/advertisements to "adds".. where is the extra d coming from ?

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

If you watch adds, advertisers put their D where they want.

[–] andxz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm with you there. When I see "adds", I want to know where they're coming from and who's going to tank them.

Ads, on the other hand, those I'm content with knowing my adblocker is taking care of it.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I had a video of a newsworthy event a while back that went viral, and I made over 5 grand on it over the course of about 2-3 years when YouTube changed its monetization policy to require like 10k subscribers or something before the creator could monetize.

The video didn't stop getting views. It had a spike in views just a few weeks ago when something similar happened in the same area. But I haven't made any money from it in like 8 years.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I know nothing about how YT works. How is 20 million shorts views in 90 days a viable number? That seems ridiculous.

I guess they'll keep pushing it till the line starts going down.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

You can make money on YouTube without having a monetized account. But you can also make money on PeerTube in exactly the same way.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Pichai you fucking banchode.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Good luck creating content, shittube

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago

Keep moving the goalposts so YT can just keep more of the ad money for themselves and the line moving up. More enshittification, nothing new is created but the service gets worse in the name of profitability.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago

Don't worry, guys. After creators eat THIS shit sandwich it'll stop getting worse and everything will be great.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 52 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I used to display Google ad links on my site, they accumulated value - slowly, but Google would only cut a check when you reach $100 worth of ads shown. My earnings approached $100 like an asymptote, halfway there in the first 6 months, 3/4 in the first year, 7/8 in the second year, 15/16 in the third... never did quite reach $100, and so my payout for all my effort and showing of their ads remains to this day $0.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think it would be super easy for them to fudge the numbers on their side.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 7 points 1 day ago

And when you have "proof" they fudged their numbers, how exactly do you make the monster pay? It's definitely a rigged game.

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

And they will continue to bleed talent for every ounce of value they can, just like the record industry, the movie and tv industry, the book industry, the video game industry, enshitification is an emergent property of a degree of value extraction.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

For a second, I thought this required creators to watch 8000 hours of videos, and felt relief.

It would at least throw up an obstacle for bot/spam accounts. They’d have to make the effort of watching a bunch of videos.

…But no.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 140 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Then they removed their ads from all channels below 8,000 hours, right?... Right?!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CaffeinatedCubits@programming.dev 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I watch less YouTube than ever thanks to the sheerly ridiculous amount if ads.

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

Remember everybody. Get a vpn with a node in albania. Youtube cannot force a signin or display ads to people in albania.

Its really that simple.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Yeah no kidding. Morphe is a blessing. Same with ublock.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] redditStinksSuperBad@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Today I went on shorts and the first video was tucker carlson dropping antisemtic slurs while he cried about ben shapiro. I'm a lib. I don't watch that garbage. straight up shithole company.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] rottenmummy@lemmy.ml 86 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Reminds me of that woman who made science videos on both YouTube and Pornhub and she makes more money on Pornhub.

[–] evidences@lemmy.world 66 points 3 days ago (3 children)

If I'm remembering correctly it was more money per view on pornhub but she had significantly more views on YouTube so the total amount per platform was still significantly in YouTube favor.

Still wild that a porn site theoretically pays better than Google.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Polisheocket@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 days ago

Big corp squeezing more money from people “because share holders want progress”. BS

[–] magnue@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago (1 children)

YouTube became evil the moment we all dislike-bombed their year in review video and they never made another one.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 28 points 3 days ago (3 children)

YouTube became evil when google ditched their slogan "don't be evil!".

So, it was evil from the start. It just needed to lure enough uncritical consumers in before enshittification started. Piece by piece.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›