this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2026
518 points (98.3% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

47183 readers
956 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, but attribution is not required in any way. No links to Reddit in post body


-If you would like to provide a source link, do so in the comments but not in the post body.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

I can't say I'm a fan, but it's great to see people still listening to Bif Naked in 2026.

[–] Ramsesder13te@feddit.org 3 points 16 hours ago

Barenaked Ladies

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah only think of the children, how traumatized they get when they realize nakedness exists. /s

[–] cosmos8188@leminal.space 3 points 16 hours ago

But wait, how about their realisation that the word crap exists or fuck - without a censor 😨

[–] Kintarian@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I wonder what happens if I search for Butthole Surfers?

[–] bluesheep@sh.itjust.works 53 points 1 day ago (2 children)

When I try and look up the band "Suicidal Tendencies" the only thing I get is a suicide hotline message. It's so fucking stupid

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

I have a similar problem when I try to search for "Codi Vore" on porn sites. I'm often greeted with an error message, "why are you searching for vore, you sick fuck?"

She doesn't even do vore, that's just her porn name.

[–] bluesheep@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago

Literally 1984

[–] swab148@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I bet they wouldn't even give you a Pepsi, smh

[–] bluesheep@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

It's all I wanted

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 106 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Searching for Bare Naked Ladies must be a nightmare.

[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 41 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] sidebro@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] echindod@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago

There's a pornogrind band called Cock and Ball Torture. It's very difficult to find their music.

Maybe if you make it two words. That’s not the name of the band though.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barenaked_Ladies

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 18 points 1 day ago

They probably have a filter for celebrity name + naked.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 44 points 1 day ago (2 children)

they definitely have the resources to whitelist valid combinations, but some shirt ran the numbers and decided it wouldn't bring enough money in

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Playing devil's rusted avocado, if I know anything about mature content submissions, they'll latch onto any whitelisted combo as soon as it's discovered and dilute the actual desired content.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

but that's also true of literally any other keyword out there. They wouldn't particularly be driving any more traffic since that's not what the user was searching for, they'd just be getting their whole site delisted.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Hey if it's good enough for the US federal government to use to kill scientific studies, then it's good enough for them

I really hope those kids they have saved never realize they themselves are naked below their clothing. They'd instantly die fatally of lethal shock.

[–] SalmonTractor@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Insane how weighted response filtering and graph search have existed for eons, to say nothing about the fact the search query could be pre-parsed by an LLM/"AI", and only now do these moronic companies use hard keyword filters.

Makes you wonder if it's really "for the children" or just attempts at hard-censoring to train their future AI models.

[–] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Repeat after me: It's NEVER about the children. It's ALWAYS about control. The EPSTEIN class cares not for your children except how to exploit them and profit off your compliance.

[–] SalmonTractor@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 19 hours ago

100%. Everything they say should always be inverted.

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

They've been censoring stuff like this for years and years before llms even existed man. People are like so up in arms about ai and all the bullshit there that they forget about how things were even 3 years ago. If you notice one of the biggest things on here is the dude isn't signed in if you're not signed in then it's going to ask if you're legit or not.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Uh that user was saying that AI would be an improvement over hard keyword filters... and YouTube is an AI company so they should in fact know that

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago

It's not really an improvement.

[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 71 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The Scunthorpe problem strikes again.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That one seemed to be all about offending substrings in words.

I find this one even dumber because it's simply dumb to censor the word "naked", which isn't even explicit, can be used figuratively, etc.

I think youtube just wants more people to create accounts.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 55 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I forget exactly what I was searching for, but it had the word young in it. Google told me this is illegal and refused to do it.

Scared me off the whole Internet for like 2 days.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 19 hours ago

The Young Ones!

Same here, but on a different site ahem. The actor is literally listed under that name, so looking them up needs an actual query engineering to avoid looking like a pedo.

[–] radiofreebc@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I met her once. She's really nice and super down to earth.

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Facebook marketplace wouldn't let me search for an LSD for my car, I had to search for a limited slip differential, which gave me a ton of results for posts that had "LSD" in the listing.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Yo! Bif Naked ftw!

Been a fan since the Buffy appearance lol.

[–] arctanthrope@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)

a while back I was looking for someone named "Molly Green" on Instagram and they said "we cannot complete this request. here are addiction treatment resources"

[–] Carl@anarchist.nexus 29 points 1 day ago

A while back I sent my buddy a TikTok with the comment “this fucking killed me” and got an “if you are thinking about hurting yourself, here is the suicide prevention hotline” automated warning in the chat.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Do a video search with "site:youtube.com" on the various Web search engines that have a video search.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=site%3Ayoutube.com+bif+naked+let+down&iar=videos

You don't need to use YouTube's search engine to search YouTube.

EDIT: I mean, many of you, like me, probably long-since tried and then gave up on using Reddit's (really bad, at least last time I tried it) search engine to search Reddit, but found that doing "site:reddit.com" searches on Web search engines was still useful. The same principle applies elsewhere...

EDIT2: Plus, you may not even want the site:youtube.com qualifier, if you're fine with videos from other video-hosting websites.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hack3900@lemy.lol 35 points 1 day ago

If google believes I'll find porn by looking up "naked" on youtube thu problem might be tht they forgot their content filters.. Not the search

load more comments
view more: next ›