this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2026
1055 points (99.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41561 readers
3792 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thefloweracidic@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I can't remember where I heard this or of it is true, but apparently it would have cost significantly more money to deceive the public with a fake moon landing than it would have been to fund the mission. When I think about the effort they would have put behind this ruse it makes sense as I'm sure the media was all over the event and the fakery wouldn't have been isolated to a single broadcast.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

The thing is fake moon landing people are also flat earthers and shit. To them, the money isn’t the important part, it’s the hiding of some sort of special knowledge. When you say it would cost more that implies that there’s an option that costs less which is possible in the first place.

To them, there’s always another layer of justification they can add. Russia would have said something? Well, you see, the Russia/USA beef is manufactured by a secret cabal of, I dunno, Freemasons. It would have been leaked? Don’t worry, everyone involved was replaced by obidient clones.

With a good editor, some conspiracy theorists could be decent writers if they weren’t using their creativity to be insane.

[–] BlackPenguins@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Adam Ruins Everything had a similar claim.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 days ago

CGI in 1988.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Now imagine how CGI was when they flew to the moon in 1969!

The best argument against the moon landings being fake is the sheer amount of people involved in the Apollo project. Estimates go up to 400'000 people (with different levels of involvement). If it had all been fake, someone would have blabbed by now.

[–] thefloweracidic@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

One of my favorite quotes is "The only way three people can keep a secret is if two of them are dead", from some random western movie, but yes people love to blab.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

And you cannot deny the truth of that statement. I know that quote differently, btw: "Two can keep a secret, if one of them us dead.", and I think that was from "Yes, Minister!" 😃

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Actually the best argument would be that the Soviets didn’t raise holy hell about it being fake.

Apollo 11 was able to be tracked by radio the entire trip to the moon. The radio transmissions and The television broadcast was unencrypted over plain radio. I’m sure the Soviets were able to verify the entire mission in real time. If there was even a hint that the moon landing was fake, the Soviets would have been throwing it in the US’s face the instant it happened.

[–] kossa@feddit.org 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You don't think your conspiracies big enough. Obviously the Soviet Union was in on it, something, something New World Order. Nobody knows what's to be gained for whom, but that is what conspiracy theories are made of.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

This kills me the most. Most nations can't agree on taxes or land boundaries or hundreds of other things, but they agree on space. Sure. That tracks.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

Soviet probes were on the surface the same week Apollo 11 landed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Now imagine how CGI was when they flew to the moon in 1969!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 81 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] dingus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Consider my mind thoroughly boggled

[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Alright, I've noted you down as boggled 👍

[–] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

This is one of my fave images of all time

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A kiwi bird using a parachute??? Holy fuck, how did they do it?!?

[–] Karjalan@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

They just strapped a parachute to a real kiwi, chucked it out of a plane and took a photo

[–] mappe@moplemmy.fyi 140 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I heard they got Stanley Kubrick to fake the landing, but he was such a stickler for accuracy he got them to actually go to the moon to film it.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I’m not sure how he was in 1969(?) but by the time he made Full Metal Jacket in the 1980s(?) he was so afraid of flying, he had palm trees brought in to England rather than shoot on location in Vietnam. Which is why all the palm trees in that movie look dead as hell. So I’m guessing he would not have gone to the moon, but would have had moon craters brought to him. Which means someone would have had to go to the moon to get them. Therefore, we went to the moon. Checkmate atheists.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] negativenull@piefed.world 88 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Special effects in late 60s:
69hCBrQrM7Vxs3F.jpg

[–] affenlehrer@feddit.org 30 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

2001: A Space Odyssey has very good effects

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 46 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Of course it does. It's made by that guy who faked the moon landing and then beat up Olive Oyl

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

They wanted to fake a moon landing and after analyzing cost they concluded that the cheapest option was to film on location.

[–] Brimstone@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

After the big rocket the costs were mostly catering

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BlindPenguin@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Opinions of the guy aside, I recall it was Neil DeGrasse Tyson who made the argument that it simply is cheaper and easier to go to the moon than to fake it and maintain the coverup.

Like, we can't keep secrets for shit, but that's the one that stays kept?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Most people I've brought the moon landing up to think the moon landing was fake. I usually point out a few examples to explain away the their arguments. Also I add that thinking it was fake is a huge slap in the face to all the skilled people who made it happen.

I feel like I'm going crazy. But everything I've looked up are credible sources, unlike some stupid YouTuber pointing to the the flag and saying "there's no wind on the moon, how do you explain that sheep!"

They put a fucking pole through the top of the flag to keep it straight, because they also realize there was no fucking wind. A kindergarten could work out how to do that.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

We measure the distance of the moon every month by laser, targeting a mirror array on the moon.

I watched a documentary, Behind the Curve, about flat earthers who drove to the NASA space center to explain how everything was fake. On the drive, you can clearly see them using GPS for directions in their car. They don't believe their bullshit, every flat earth influencer story has a point where they were losers and unemployed and they saw easy money in grifting simps.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The real cover-up about the flag is so much more fun. The astronauts were sworn to secrecy for decades.

Then decades later, some scientists were taking high resolution photos of the moon that weren't quite good enough to see the flags themselves but did show the shadows of them. But they couldn't see a shadow for the Apollo 11 flag, and then NASA had to come clean.

When they took off from the Moon, Buzz Aldrin saw the thrust of the spacecraft blow the flag over. When he told NASA about it in the debriefing they told him "you can never tell anyone this."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 days ago

Best argument I've heard is that the Soviets never denied it happened. Same with the nazis and the Holocaust.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 45 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Actually the second moon turned out not to be a moon at all, it was a red herring and it was Earth All Along

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

The Moon landing was staged, but Kubrick insisted on shooting on location.

[–] lyrial@anarchist.nexus 23 points 2 days ago (8 children)
[–] Tiral@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't think it was fake at all, but I don't think I've ever heard a denier say it was cgi. They say it's a stage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

Am I a joke to you?!

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I remember when I was in kindergarten and the teacher was cool for reminding us that Beast Wars is coming up soon in couple of hours, so we could have something to look forward to going home!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] danhab99@programming.dev 23 points 3 days ago (7 children)

That's just a psyop, NASA and the CIA were hiding some of the world's leading stable diffusion models for the time in a secret underground Data center somewhere in the Nevada desert.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›