this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2026
55 points (95.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

41161 readers
2241 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !uspolitics@lemmy.world


7) No Hit-and-Run questions.
Please don't delete your post for no apparent reason. If you plan on deleting a question later, say so in the post, or if you feel that you have a good reason to remove it, message a mod beforehand. It's not fair to the ones who took their time to answer, and it's not in the spirit of the community.


8) No Bots.
Posts or comments from bots, LLM's, AIs, Neural Networks, Transformers, or Marvin the Paranoid Android are not welcome in AskLemmy. Real humans only please.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Organizations like the Yakuza, 'Ndrangheta, Cosa Nostra, the Irish Mafia, etc, are part of many countries, to bigger or smaller fashion.

But to someone from those countries, what do you think was the original/historical cause for such organizations to develop?

My country - Portugal - has some degree of presence of these organizations but, to my knowledge, we never developed our domestic version of a crime syndicate. And we are not a bunch of choir boys. Something just kept things from forming. And that intrigues me.

So, what is the understanding of someone from a country where the organizations exist?

top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 15 points 7 hours ago

Yes. The answer for everyone is yes.

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Organized crime is an interesting topic. In my opinion it's existence shows a disconnect of the needs of the people and their government/social structure. Every country has some amount of "organized crime". There is no exception. What does differ is the size, power, and wealth of the criminal syndicate.

The larger and more severe the disconnect between the people's needs and government, the more extensive and structured these criminal organizations become.

For example gangs often form in an regions where opportunity is limited or a group of people are being oppressed. Inner city gangs are a good example of this. They form as a form of protection and a chance for opportunity. These opportunities are usually supplying things that are illegal but still in demand.

If government bans or fails to provide something with a very high demand (like prohibition of alcohol in the U.S. and just about everything in the Soviet Union) the criminal organizations grow in wealth and sophistication.

The only effective way to stop these criminal organizations is fulfill the demand and provide other opportunities for the individuals. For example the U.S. legalized alcohol. This dramatically reduced income to criminal opportunity. Under FDR support structures, fair wages, education, and all sorts of opportunities were created (for whites). The opportunity for individual people through criminal activity declined and most of them left the criminal organizations. In darker skin colored groups where opportunity remained limited, criminal activity remained higher.

Organized crime can be dramatically reduced by providing opportunities to all individuals.

Alternatively a complete collapse and takeover by the criminal organizations like the Soviet Union to Russia is also a option.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 hours ago

I share this view as well.

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 13 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Organized crime is in basically every single country in the world

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago

But do all have homegrown societies? My country, to my knowledge, does not nor has ever had such organizations. We started getting some degree of them when we had a large influx of eastern europe imigrants that were followed by criminal organizations but they don't have enough footing here to become influent.

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

When i was a teen, I had a bookie who was affiliated with a certain Italian-American civil rights organization.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 75 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

In America, we have three kinds of organized crime. Executive, Legislative, and Judicial.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 hours ago

That is institutional corruption, not organized crime. The two can touch and even overlap to some degree but are the same.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 50 points 20 hours ago (2 children)
[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 5 points 14 hours ago

He already said America.

[–] username_1@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 20 hours ago

In my country all governmental branches belong to one single crime organization.

[–] Denjin@feddit.uk 60 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Doesn't every country have some degree of organised crime present?

Like they may not have glamorous crime families like the Mafia but wherever there's crime, there's organised crime groups.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Organized crime, in my understanding, implies structure, reach and even some degree of a social facade to clear money and move interests. Not a group of individuals constantly on the crosshairs.

[–] Denjin@feddit.uk 1 points 2 hours ago

Yes, exactly...

[–] zombiebikini@lemmy.zip 12 points 19 hours ago

I would say yes. I couldn't think of a country without organized crime. It doesn't always have a fancy name and maybe it is very lowkey, but this I'd take as a sign of being well organized.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 5 points 13 hours ago

The corporate mob(s) are the worst. But since we don't have anyone willing to take them down, the FBI has too much sand in it's mangina, we don't even get any takedowns.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 18 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (3 children)

Is there anywhere in the modern world that doesn't have organized crime? Just because people ain't being arrested for it doesn't necessarily mean they don't exist. It could mean they're not being caught or own the law.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago

Organized crime, in my understanding, is not something that collapses with the death of a member or two or through a well placed intervention of authoritites. It has structure by itself, transcends generations, develops its culture, has a public, visible face, either for popular support or fear engineering.

[–] Tiral@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

You're right, it exists everywhere. Just because if isn't Al LCapones everywhere, it exists.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Vatican City. (I know, I know "the church counts". Hur-hur, very funny Lemmy)

Maybe a few Pacific island nations, just by virtue of there not being enough people to support it.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Wow, okay, I stand corrected. Just embezzlement wouldn't count, but it sounds like there was quite the network doing things elsewhere in cooperation, at least per the prosecutors.

It's pretty weird to imagine that, of people who chose to become priests, there's enough who want to directly extort and scam the Vatican, that they can find each other and start a group.

Also, TIL Vatican City has a jail.

[–] Anchorxiety@reddthat.com 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I'm from Northern Ireland and many of the so-called "paramilitary" groups that used to be a part of the conflict here have shifted towards organised crime in the 21st century. It goes for both Republican and Loyalist groups. In fact, these days it's extremely rare for both sides to attack each other. They mostly have internal feuds with rival groups. It's moreso on the Loyalist side, though.

(Just in case anyone isn't aware, Republicans in this context are those who want a full 32 county Irish republic, while Loyalists are those who reject Irish unity and want NI to remain as part of the UK).

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago

No matter the amount of brain power I put to it I can't make sense if why the UK does not release the Northern Ireland territory.

Under EU umbrella with would have been nearly frictionless, if well thought out.

And Ireland, as a nation, accepts it. I would love to see the outcomes of referendums on both countries regarding that territory, one for releasing the area, the other on integrating it. Peacefully, obviously.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I have bad news:

If your government has "private sector" organized crime under control, they have simply taken over the organized crime. Society abhors a vacuum.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago

That sounds too much of a conspiracy theory to hold any value as an argument.

Are you stating that by default if a nation does not have organized crime, then the state itself is a crime organization?

That implies all individuals within such country are criminals, without excuse or exception.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I mean, a government itself is just a big racketeering scheme, with an anthem and good public support. If you look at how they actually function. Edit: And if you think that's necessary and right or not.

If they took control of whatever smaller racketeering group's operations, then that's just a a new tax, which doesn't really make sense.

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

There is still some around here, but not like in the past, nobody was shaking us down for protection money in our little storefront (that used to happen in the same neighborhood) but a lot of the drugs still come through those organizations and there are still gangs around - there was a police standoff with a biker gang a few blocks from my house once, they shut down the streets.

I guess the US is too big and disorganized.

Now - LA in the early 1990s - I stayed there awhile and holy crap, anything people say about gangs during that time is true. The police were a big violent gang, the prisons had gang riots, I knew people in gangs even though it wasn't my world, it was widespread. So disorganized organized crime, there was a lot of that back then

[–] farmgineer@nord.pub 4 points 15 hours ago

I live in Japan so we have Yakuza (and I'm assuming a number of other crime orgs from China, HK, and more). The wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yakuza does a good job of explaining.

Generally they have zero direct impact on my life. Generally the only time they'll mess with foreigners is through scams to get people into bars where they have crazy high prices, drug you, or both. Or, I guess, if you seek them out for some reason.

[–] 20cello@lemmy.world 13 points 20 hours ago

I'm from Italy, organised crime flourish where the state doesn't reach. Then they expand, just like corporations, infiltrating the political parties.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 3 points 14 hours ago

In Canada the entire construction industry is basically the mob. Has been for decades.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 9 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Organized crime exists everywhere. In the places that don't have a stereotyped reputation for it, the organized crime groups are either better at hiding or have more control over the local government and don't get investigated.

For instance, in Myanmar, Cambodia and Laos internet scams are a significant portion of the economy. In Laos the scams revenue represent about 68% of their GDP:

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/dec/02/scam-state-multi-billion-dollar-industry-south-east-asia

Local governments have tried to crack down on the scam centers, but the operations are so large that basically everyone in the country is either involved directly, or knows someone personally who is.

“These are massive pieces of infrastructure, set up very publicly. You can go to borders and observe them. You can even walk into some of them,” says Tower. “The fact this is happening in a very public way shows just the extreme level of impunity – and the extent to which states are not only tolerating this, but actually, these criminal actors are becoming state embedded.”

The point being, most of the time there isn't a "crime family" like in movies and TV shows. Organized crime is business, and in a lot of places it's business as usual.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

So a lot of people here are going to be very broad and not particular about corruption in the US.

I live in Hawaii, and what most people in the US experience is a more general, liberalized form of corruption; a corruption which is more baked into the process and acceptable. Corruption as law, as process; formalized and legal.

However, in Hawaii, we have a very, very different form of corruption. Bags of cash getting handed to legislatures. You can't get a permit for construction in less than a year unless you bribe someone. The sheriff in Maui was thinking they like be walter white and control all crime syndicates in the county. Web of bribery extending throughout the state house with rumors it goes all the way to Governor Josh green.

So we end up with lots of underground/ "illegal" activity. Underground like, fell neighbor to neighbor, just gotta know, type thing. Get one game room, some thing fell offa truck. local kine shit.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago

So it is essentially an ingrained scheme of institutional corruption, too hard to break apart because it has become a de facto means of getting things done.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I live in a first world country so we have legal organised crime and illegal organised crime.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 15 hours ago

Because of course third world countries have no corrupt authorities. /s

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

How much press an organization gets does not necessarily correspond to how big it is. Obviously, Africa has a certain crime rate, but whatever bandit gang doesn't have the same PR.

In the case of the Irish, mass immigration to America followed by few opportunities once there. I'm not sure how much they did in Ireland itself; probably not nothing, but probably not as much. In the case of southern Italy, what you'll read is that the political instability and weak authorities had something to do with it. Like, the Cosa Nostra functioned more like warlords than your typical criminal organisation, at points.

The Yakuza will tell you they have a direct link to the samurais, but you should believe that about as much as if the 'Ndrangheta told you they were knights. Are they, or do they just figure that will earn them more recruits?

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

In the US we have a type of organized crime run by health insurance companies.

Corporations like United Healthcare charge huge monthly premiums then consistently refuse up to 30% of valid claims. They make the appeals process so difficult and time consuming most people never successfully appeal a denial. These companies routinely murder thousands of people each year for money, but since they pay off our lawmakers there are zero repercussions and they're free to continue their murderous activities year after year.

The only difference between this and any other type of organized crime is the profits are legal due to those payoffs, and in part thanks to Citizen's United and our crooked SCOTUS justices.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago

That is a social problem not organized crime.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

If somebody does a bad thing, but that bad thing is legal, they're still not a criminal.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Legalized murder is still murder. Organized crime has compromised government regulators and lawmakers many times and it's still organized crime. Your comment is invalid.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Oor is that "murder" an execution, or a lawful military strike? All amount to killing people.

And, for what it's worth, most people aren't strict pacifists, so the majority opinion is that killing people can be good, in addition to legal.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

so the majority opinion is that killing people can be good

Not something I'd expect when discussing organized crime and the legalized murder of people paying companies for insurance coverage. Unfortunately on social media there's always some contrarian will take the opposite position no matter what is said. Today that's you.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

You know, forget about just wars, or moral vs. legal.

This was a question about mafias. Literal mafias, and I think you know the difference. By trying to force this to be another US political thread, you've become whatever the opposite of a contrarian is, and that's worse. Like, a circlejerker, or something.

Lots of us aren't even American! Maybe we don't care about what's going on in your country. (I mean, in general we do, but damn)

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

There's a long standing rumor where I live that the Hell's Angels own a bunch of infrastructure stuff like vehicle registries. I dunno of that's true or not though.

Also a suspicious amount of old buildings that are protected for historical reasons seem to catch fire right after being bought for development.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago

I worked with a guy that had a run in with two HA's that came to our country to settle a score for a local affiliate.

What I was told is that they have this structure where if you have enough favour in the "club" to ask for help in solving an issue, you get members sent from abroad to "lend some shade".

The other guy got two bruisers sent from the US that only managed to get beat up and arrested in a very public fashion here. Spent a few months seeing the sun rise chekered and got deported afterwards.