this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2026
461 points (98.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

16603 readers
812 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] myyass@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

The floor was wet and they didn't have non-slip shoes. Clearly just slipped and fell. With a knife in their hand because it makes you run faster.

[–] Garbagio@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 hours ago

I mean, I hear you, but knives and guns have verbs that have the general connotation of lethality. "Shot," and "stabbed," have easily understood repercussions within a single term. We need a word for cars, and we don't have one. I understand that "person hit person with car" has a sentence structure implying grave harm, but there simply isn't the cognitive weight behind "hit" as there is "stabbed" or "shot." "Hit," "murdered," etc. all implicitly bury the lede of "car" just by merit of their generality.

[–] gex@lemmy.world 18 points 19 hours ago

Was the cashier wearing a hi-vis stab-proof vest?

[–] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Mother and child walked in path of bullets

A Mother and her son died in the emergency room after they walked straight into the path of fired bullets. The 92 year old gun owner mixed up the trigger with the safety of his assault rifle and will have to pay a fine of $200. His lawyer announced that they will appeal the judgement, arguing that his client needs the money for new ammunition.

[–] vividspecter@aussie.zone 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Addendum: they were not wearing ~helmets~ bulletproof vests.

[–] untorquer@quokk.au 16 points 1 day ago

Bullets kidnapped by mother and child

[–] muzzle@lemmy.zip 68 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This works even better for western media reporting about israel

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Hell no. Western reporting will run headlines like "Israel continues to commit genocide by targeting children in Gaza, UN inquiry finds". In car crash that would be something like "During tensions between Israel and Gaza children have passed away UN inquiry finds"

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Yeah, headlines in June 2026 are different. The "Israelis are killed, Palestinians die" problem was more pronounced earlier in the genocide and there are a lot of articles about it.

[–] Micromot@piefed.social 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)
[–] Axiochus@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

The BBC's report was criticized by activists who considered the original headline ("Gaza man with Down's syndrome dies lonely death") to be obscuring the Israeli military's responsibility in the incident; the headline was later changed to "Gaza man with Down's syndrome attacked by IDF dog and left to die, mother tells BBC".[10][3] The New Arab reported that the attack was not mentioned until the article's 16th paragraph, nearly halfway through the article.[3]

Memorable example.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 day ago

Try "Belgian driver convicted of murder over carnival car crash that killed seven people"

Guy literally got convicted of murder and it is still just a "crash".

Hell you can even murder police and get a headline like: "Police sergeant dies from injuries after officials say man intentionally rammed into his motorcycle"

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago

The post makes a good point. I'd never considered that, but the with cars and guns these sorts of euphemistic headlines are rampant.

[–] waigl@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I see every article talking about car drivers hitting bicyclists ever.

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, you see it was the car that hit the cyclist, it did that on its own, that's why they're called automobiles, the car driver is the real victim here.

[–] Souvenir@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

To be fair the driver was either black-out drunk or on their phone, so it's fair to say they weren't really driving at the time.

In many parts of the world it's legal for farmers to kill a dog that's worrying(chasing) or attacking cattle because the owner isn't in control of them.

By that logic, it should be legal to shoot out the tyres or otherwise put out of service a car the owner has lost control of.

[–] Solely_a_Catt@programming.dev 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yes. By "The News".

Almost like it's fake.

[–] Octavio@piefed.social 5 points 22 hours ago

How dare you impugn the journalistic integrity of Reporta Lotte.

[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's on the internet so it must be true

[–] Opisek@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago

I always trust Reporta Lotte's every word

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago

omg is that the same organization as in https://xkcd.com/1583/