this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2026
111 points (96.6% liked)

politics

31112 readers
2508 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In 2022, no-fault divorce finally came to the UK. Couples can now simply call it quits by declaring an “irretrievable breakdown” in their marriage without needing to cite a reason (like adultery) for the split. The legal shake-up was hailed as a much-needed overhaul that would streamline the process of divorce and ease undue stress on couples and the family courts. In this aspect, we had lagged behind our neighbours across the pond for decades.

In 1969, California became the first state to legalise no-fault divorce, with then-governor Ronald Reagan declaring : “I believe it is a step towards removing the acrimony and bitterness between a couple that is harmful not only to their children but also to society as a whole.” The rest of America soon followed. By 2010, every US state had legalised some form of no-fault divorce. The “no-fault revolution”, as it became known, had finally won.

At least, until recently. Right-wing commentators like Daily Wire host Matt Walsh have previously shared support for an end to no-fault divorce, while podcasters Tim Pool and Steven Crowder argue that it creates a “raw deal” for men. Now-Vice President JD Vance argued on his 2021 Senate campaign trail that it let people “shift spouses like they change their underwear” (although, he hasn’t made any public comments on this since). House Speaker Mike Johnson has campaigned against it for years and once said that he holds it partly responsible for creating an “amoral society” that leads young people to “go into their schoolhouse and open fire on their classmates”.

This isn’t all talk from politicians and conservative blow-hards, either. There is legislative momentum building in red states like Texas, Iowa and Louisiana, which are all attempting to scale back no-fault divorce. In Texas, Republican legislators have repeatedly called to abolish it and even introduced a bill to that effect. It failed in 2025 but the party has continued to commit to ending it as part of its 2026 policy agenda. Iowa Republicans have also introduced a bill that would allow couples to sign away their right to no-fault divorces when they get married.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 8 points 13 hours ago

Men also benefit from no-fault divorce. It's a war on individual autonomy.

[–] Wren@lemmy.today 26 points 19 hours ago

There's no possible evidence-backed reason to end no-fault divorce. It's 100% ill-advised christian politics from people who want men to lead the home and for birthrates to go up.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 18 points 19 hours ago

Weird how all these terrible men that must be insufferable to live with want to make getting a divorce more difficult.

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 14 points 19 hours ago

Abusers want a legal way to trap their victims. Trap them with rape and pregnancy and with no fault divorce.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 11 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Welp, seems like a whole lot of people are just going to start dying again. Both those trapping and those tired of being trapped

Edit: a word

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Using terms like "maga" is mostly nonsense and gives more credit to a cult of personality, which is all "maga" really means.

This crap comes straight out of the grievances of the far right republicons that adhere to crazy nonsense like the Seven Mountain Mandate. This has been part of the republicon DNA for a long time and should be exposed and talked about at every opportunity - since back when donnie was still just working for his daddy. 7MM goes back to 1975.

I say this because people imagine that the republicon fever will break when donnie is gone. It may implode in the moment, but these people believe in this shit, and it will outlast "maga" by a country mile. These dumbfucks are not going anywhere even long after donnie is dust. They think this country should be run by and for xtians.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 10 points 20 hours ago
[–] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 13 hours ago
[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

ya that ain't gonna happen. the ones with the money or power aren't gonna want to start (or rather, go back to...) airing their dirty laundry in public, on the record and in public court rooms.

that was reagan's motivation back in the late-1960s, it would be the motivation to keep it now... and i think a far greater force than these far-right nutjobs that want to abolish it.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 1 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

These so called conservatives really have the worst stance on like every issue.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

This is core conservative stuff.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 4 points 15 hours ago

box labeled traditional values. inside: every evil known to mankind, every possible way to be an absolute shit person and a menace to not only society but existence in general