politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
"Because of tariffs, we are taking in hundreds of billions of dollars of profits," he said. "It's one of the reasons I can offer, if Republicans win the House and the Senate, $5,000 to every adult. And we can do it and the Democrats can't, because the Democrats don't have any income, and they're gonna drive us in[to] a depression. They won't have any money."
His so-called logic is so bad it makes my head hurt.
- You already control both chambers. You could pass it now if it wasn't an obvious bribe to get people to vote for your party.
- Nothing about the Dems winning midterms stops the tariffs being in place. Literally your entire legal argument is that you don't need Congress to approve them, so logically the Dems controlling Congress wouldn't stop them if that was true. So they'd still have the money.
How do people actually fall for this shit? How?!
Measles have returned because people believe vaccines cause autism. That's your answer.
Will this be the first infectious disease to be both eradicated and reintroduced? Damn, we're good.
Anybody know where we can get ahold of some small pox? /s
In 1993 Michael Crichton introduces us to the wonders of de-extinction and we all dreamed of dinosaurs in zoos. 33 years later and all we get is rebooted viruses.
Oh we have us an optimist here. We aren't even lucky enough to have a president Dwayne Elizando Mountain Dew Camacho.
Idiocracy would be a step up. We are in a full-on kakistocracy.
At least in that fictional narrative they knew enough to reward someone smarter than them.
The way it typically works is to have the dumbest declare that their vibes overrule expertise.
Yep that's why I say that I would much rather be in an idiocracy situation right now. It was truly an optimistic look at the future. If you look back now.
How do people actually fall for this shit? How?!
Many people "Reason" emotionally. The words don't matter so much as the feelings.
It's like the people going on vibes toward the end of 2024 and deciding that voting for donnie would improve their lot. Even though virtually every economic indicator was pointed in the right direction at that point.
Meanwhile, lots of the chattering class kept flogging anyone pointing this out, saying it negated people's feelings to point out the facts of an economy that was on the right track.
Also, Dems winning does not make this supposed money go away. If they are taking in these "hundreds of billions", that belongs to the government, not the Republicans.
"They're going to drive us into a depression"
...Unlike the depression that's already forming because of his fucking stupid and disastrous economic policies?
Yeah, I'll take my chances with the party that has consistently brought economic stability, rather than the party that is ruining the economy (again) and flagrantly trying to buy votes (after they've already made similar promises and failed to deliver).
The only party that actually reduces or has ever done away with deficits to the point of surplus, and the only party that has done so nearly every time elected, with the exception of those inheriting a pandemic and a nation with an economy crashing thanks to it.
Bro, tariffs are paid by us.
You’re promising to give us our money back? Like you can do that? Maybe just fucking do it right now?
Nobody should vote for republicans this guy screws everyone over all the time. If republicans win they will tariff harder and take even more away because their policy approach is fuck you that’s why.
But hey maybe we’ll get some more asshole racist ai video entertainment or whatever.
Don't forget the massive chunk he added to the national debt. He stole America's wallet, ran up the credit card, and now expects forgive and forget because he handed back $5.
And the sad thing is, it'll work on a sizable chunk of the US electorate.
Yes, tariffs are paid by you, but do you believe that someone stupid enough to vote for the orange-haired monkey would understands this? For them, the farm shop or Walmart just raised prices because things got more expensive.
Except those tariff refunds go back to the companies (even though taxpayers pay), like Nintendo for example, and then they can decide whether or not to refund. Most won't.
Ignoring everything else wrong with this, it's government money. If it actually existed it wouldn't just vanish when a democrat gets elected.
Trump and cronies are pros at making government money vanish.
I mean, if it were from tariffs it just might because Democrats would actually follow the law and stop the tariffs and refund the illegally collected money. Unfortunately that would go back to businesses not individuals.
Although Trump was already ordered to pay back the money so either he ignored the courts or the money already doesn't exist.
"Because of tariffs, we are taking in hundreds of billions of dollars of profits," he said. "It's one of the reasons I can offer, if Republicans win the House and the Senate, $5,000 to every adult. And we can do it and the Democrats can't, because the Democrats don't have any income, and they're gonna drive us in[to] a depression. They won't have any money."
He's flat out saying he considers the tarrif money "his" if a Republican government has access to it but a democratic government wouldn't...
And obviously ignoring that the "profits" are from a tax on Americans buying shit
And obviously ignoring that the "profits" are from a tax on Americans buying shit
Gotta remember who he's trying to bamboozle... Not the bright lights, the dim ones
We're already in a recession you dumb fuck
I would say it's beyond at this point.
"Because of ~~tariffs~~ taxes, I think I can bribe the stupider among you with your own fucking money."
--donnie dumb dumb
Impose tariffs, make all of us pay it, then dangle some refund in front of your poor white trash voters to get them to vote again.
I worry more about the rich white trash already in power.
This statement is literally unconstitutional. Plainly, unambiguously, no mask, no nuance, just unconstitutional.
The Treasury handles all of this accounting and congress directs spending. The Executive does not just get to use revenue received from its activities as a slush fund. Basically all of the US Government's revenue is collected by agencies under the Executive. Claiming that they can simply take tariff revenue and turn it into dividend checks is the exact same constitutional argument that he could take IRS revenue and turn it into Bitcoin.
It's so plainly illegal, and it demonstrates exactly why the current SCOTUS obsession with extremely strict standing requirements is a flawed concept.
It’s so plainly illegal, and it demonstrates exactly why the current SCOTUS obsession with extremely strict standing requirements is ~~a flawed concept~~ blatantly shameless, corrupt, depraved, and traitorous support for dictatorship.
FTFY.
He 100% thinks he gets to keep the tariff money.
LOL somehow only Republicans are capable of this because Democrats bad.
“Profits.” what a POS.
So, here’s the deal….
Everyone here can opine on how ludicrous this is, agree with one another about how fucking stupid he is, and circlejerk over how annoying it is that he does this dumb shit-
But he does it because he knows people are going to believe it. It’s not about wether or not he will make good on the promise- it’s only about getting the idiots to dance when he commands them to.
He is buying votes with our money, and it’s going to work like a fucking charm.
Think of it like this:
You know how during trials, some lawyers will say shit that is objectionable, and then stricken from the record? This is entirely on purpose. The jury can’t “unhear” it. Once it’s said, it’s done and it’s effect is now in play.
So, the moment that vapid disgusting bag of child-raping gelatinous flesh opened his shithole of a mouth, all the mentally challenged minions that fall at his feet bought it at a premium.
He’s not paying them shit. But they believe he will and as a result, will do exactly as he says.
I know that this is all Trump's blowhard bullshit, but the logic (and we know there isn't any) could easily be: If we have the money, and it's not his money, but money made from tariffs, then there's nothing to stop the Democrats from also giving everyone a $5000 check...
Ah yes tariffs, the Republicans personal revenue stream cumulating in a very accessible slush fund to burn whatever way that specific party wishes, up to and including bribing voters.
Makes me wonder why no one else has ever thought of this? Oh, because it's not a political loophole, just blatantly fucking illegal.
It's the government's money, not republican's money. A different party inherits the government and therefore can do what you're proposing. They'd be in the same situation.
Aside from it being false, that's not at all how you stimulate an economy. But he's never been good at growing a business, so...
Since the tariffs are a tax on American people purchasing things, and since rich people purchase more things, and the promise is to pay every person the same amount, this is classic socialist wealth redistribution.
I mean, it would be, if it ever came to pass.
But it's a charade when the 1% are getting massive tax cuts at the same time. Still a net loss to the 99% getting checks, but WEEE $5000! 🙄
Next thing you know, only select people will receive the money and he’ll complain about who is technically considered an adult.