this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2026
247 points (98.1% liked)

politics

31880 readers
2543 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Top federal prosecutor threatens payback for investigations into whether Trump’s $400 million ballroom donors are getting anything in return from the administration

A top federal prosecutor appointed by Donald Trump is threatening “significant legal consequences” over a senator’s investigation into the president’s White House ballroom — and whether donors are getting anything from the government in return.

Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal is calling the threat against him “just the latest in a series of unlawful actions” from the Trump administration in its attempts to “intimidate” members of Congress, with investigations into the president and his allies expected to accelerate after midterm elections victories.

“Your implied threat of an investigation is baseless,” Blumenthal fired back in his letter to U.S. Attorney Aaron Reitz. “I will not be intimidated.”

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 20 hours ago

I don't know why he's mad, the right thing to do next president is going to be to demo everything he's ever made or repurpose/retrofit it as like a wing that supports only DEI and humanitarian programs permanently.

[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.today 71 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Now we know where we need to focus oversight!

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 27 points 1 day ago

Seriously. How more obvious can they possibly be? Aren't they the ones often repeating the "If you've got nothing to hide, you've got nothing to worry about" mantra when it comes to things like police overreach and surveillance? For fuck's sake.

[–] Freeposity@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Indeed. A hit dog hollers.

[–] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 2 points 1 day ago

Oh, because until now we didnt think the half billion vanity project was worth looking at.

[–] sns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To quote John Goodman: "Shut the fuck up Donny!"

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 10 points 1 day ago

"You're out of your element."

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

A prosecutor threatening legal action needs to be taken seriously. And doing it for political reasons should be grounds for immediate termination in any sane world

… and I so hope we’re getting back to a sane world

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also if their name isn't Ned.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fixed. I don’t understand where some of autocorrect’s quirks come from. I do not know any Ned’s and have never intentionally written about one…… and it added the added apostrophe again?

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

well great now my comment looks incredibly weird lol

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Yeah, sorry. I should have put an edit note to be clear, but I was hoping my edit was soon enough. Now going back to add it would just be weird.

Ok here’s a weirdness freebie so you can pay me back …..

My glasses have these little magnetic dots to hold “click on” sunglasses or driving glasses. They’re very convenient, when I can find the shades. But more recently I’ve been wondering what people think……. Sure enough, I recently got asked if they were pervert glasses. Nope, “nerd glasses”

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Congressional oversight is a duty specified in Article I of the US Constitution, but perhaps the US Attorney from South Texas is unfamiliar with the document, perhaps he is also confused regarding his jurisdiction.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 20 hours ago

Nope. He's just a goon doing crime with all the other goons.

[–] mHtt@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Naw, man. Dont you know the Constitution is just some piece of paper...?

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

Toilet paper lately

[–] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the administration that investigates and prosecutes every opponent for continuing to breathe suddenly doesn't like investigations

[–] Freeposity@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

More like, criminal administrations always see investigations as a personal attack. Because that's how they use them.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 12 points 1 day ago

Every accusation is a confession of guilt, with "conservatives."

[–] rogsson@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago

I threaten you with legal consequences if you investigate our illegal activities!!!!!

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

What is it MAGA like to say? “If you don’t have anything to hide…”

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Top federal prosecutor threatens payback for investigations into whether Trump’s $400 million ballroom donors are getting anything in return from the administration

"The lady doth protest too much, methinks"

[–] skhayfa@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Let's make a deal your get the ballroom if we get Medicare 4 all!

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

Damn, now you know where they think their vulnerabilities are. This should be the top priority.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Nothing says someone is innocent like getting way butthurt over a simple inquiry into what you are up to...

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Why does he remind me of a small child threatening that his imaginary friend will do bad things to you if youbpunish him

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Significant consequences, eh

[–] Corvidae@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Authoritarians don't like oversight or checks and balances.

[–] sportsjorts@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Lock up the whole of the doj and the dhs. Criminal organizations.