197
Ex-Trump adviser says former president ‘hasn’t got the brains’ for dictatorship
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
197 points (95.4% liked)
News
37649 readers
1796 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
In my experience an incompetent person attempting to be a dictator is a lot more dangerous.
Why are we listening to John Bolton?
This. He’s such a weaselly little bitch.
Yep, "Ex-Trump adviser" is a mild way of referring to the guy who gets a hard-on at the thought of war with Iran.
Its really getting tiring that we just listen to whoever says the words we want said. If John Bolton gets praised by anyone but the neo-cons, they have lost their minds.
Circa 1932 Germany a lot of political insiders thought the same thing about Hitler.
But Hindenburg and co all propped him up be more or less that. They just miscalculated how it would work.
1932 Germany wasn't even a flawed democracy, people talk about Weimar republic as if it were really a republic.
Well, Trump may not have the brains necessary to be a smart dictator, he has more than enough people who are willing to help him out with his dictatorship problems. Some billioniares might be inclined to whisper things into Trumps ears and pay him with a spotlight in the media, stroking his overblown ego as a kind of "payment".
In other words: Trump may not be a smart dictator, but he would be one of the more dangerous ones.
You don't need brains, you only need brutality and followers.
Win or lose, he has already signaled that people will die.
I don't think we should be testing this. In any case, most dictators were barely smart enough to keep the right people happy for long enough to hold power.
Manipulation doesn't require exceptional intelligence. I've met people with major cognitive disabilities who are among the most deceptive and manipulative people you'll meet. It doesn't require intelligence, just the will and lack of moral character.
(For the record, I've also known many people with cognitive disabilities who are the most amazing, kind, and honorable people in the world. Because, again, it's not a matter of intelligence.)
You don't need to be smart to convince other dumbasses to do shit. He's already proven that.
Hey member when the demented rapist made him shave off his walrus moustache because he didn't like it?
HAHAHAh eat shit bolton you asshole
Given that every trump appointee has been a self serving swamp creature, its kind of irrelevant whether trump himself is an idiot. All you need is to create an opening for one of the ghouls and they will flood it.
So, back in 2001 the head of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) managed to get weapons inspectors into Iraq which pissed off the U.S. because it undermined their justification of the invasion.
In response John Bolton told the head of the OPCW:
You have 24 hours to leave the organization, and if you don’t comply with this decision by Washington, we have ways to retaliate against you. ... We know where your kids live. You have two sons in New York.
Oh, well I feel safe now.
Walrus man has determined a very possible next president is too stupid.
John Bolton is implying that John Bolton is smart enough to install a dictatorship. He certainly has implied such in the past.
John Bolton worked for Trump in the last administration.
Even if he specifically wouldn't do it, surely he can see why there's still reason to be concerned.
He's got the ethics for it though
I don't think that's really a prerequisite.
He's a puppet anyhow. Brains kinda sorta disqualify.
(Cuz, it never ends well for the puppet.)
Didn't stop Mussilini from trying.