md5 for example is already vulnerable. People have figured out how to manipulate data into having a pre-specified hash. Meaning someone could engineer deliberate hash collisions and serve you any file they like.
SHA-256 doesn't (i think) have this issue, so far hah.
you have to fucking hope no one figures out how to backwards engineer the hashing algorithm you choose
precisely, which is why they cannot lie, just respond with no real grasp of wether what they output is truth or falsehoods.
everything is semantics.
Lying is telling a falsehood intentionally
LLM's clearly lack the prerequisite intentionality
not really no. They are statistical models that use heuristics to output what is most likely to follow the input you give it
They are in essence mimicking their training data
Oh, i don't prefer using it anyway, it got served with it already in.
I am all for minimizing/eliminating single use plastics. But when i get served a milkshake in a plastic mug, with a plastic lid, and a plastic spoon, but a paper straw because of "save the sea"...
i just wish we used our brains more.
that was about the solar system though, not the observable universe
Well, those ones does it at the cost of size. In order to ensure separation they are comparatively huge.
If the adversary has physical access you are generally pwned either way
do you mean github or do you actually mean git?