Tim-Sanchez

No they don't? You can suspend players after an accusation, like United did with Greenwood. Especially if 5 people are making an accusation with the police investigating.

A contract doesn't mean teams are forced to pay players.

We barely have owners, so that's definitely what they've done

Crazy that it hasn't happened in so long, especially with what you can lipread and know is being said. If referees were much stricter on dissent at the top level it would have a huge benefit at all levels of the game. It would be tough for a few weeks with probably a lot of red cards, but teams and players would soon adapt.

There was no jeopardy involved, he already had generational wealth and still would have earned millions in England.

That was a recommendation to IFAB, not the rule

Players are much more likely to pull out of any other tournaments to preserve their fitness for the World Cup. As we saw with Qatar, it's all talk and players won't quit on the World Cup.

I think you've misunderstood, they didn't intend offence and therefore it's not offensive

This is the original article, it includes non-salary pay. This is the original source, so it seems believable.

You could probably limit it to just hear the VAR side of things, we don't need to hear the ref arguing with players. I understand why they show that for complete transparency though, and it would still be a huge step forward.

You could probably limit it to just hear the VAR side of things, we don't need to hear the ref arguing with players. I understand why they show that for complete transparency though, and it would still be a huge step forward.

Personally I didn't really get this, it maybe made the experience marginally better but if we're not getting full explanations or live audio then it doesn't help much. Maybe it makes a bigger difference in the stadium compared to on TV though.