this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
835 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59188 readers
3238 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] confusedbytheBasics@lemmy.world 544 points 4 months ago (17 children)

Proving Netflix could be replaced by five hard working people.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 195 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Proving Netflix could be ~~replaced~~ outdone by five hard working people.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 92 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Proving Netflix should ~~could~~ be ~~replaced~~ outdone by five hard working people.

[–] AnxiousDuck@feddit.it 36 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

~~Proving~~ Netflix ~~should~~ ~~could~~ be ~~replaced~~ ~~out~~done ~~by five hard working people~~.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anlumo@lemmy.world 120 points 4 months ago (31 children)

They didn’t need the army of lawyers to get license deals, so that’s not a fair comparison.

[–] FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml 89 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Its almost like its unecessary shit made up in order to keep profits away from working people artificially

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world 73 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah its almost like if we didn't keep extending copyright protections a bunch of stuff would be in the public domain and any streaming service could offer it without having to deal with licensing.

[–] Brickhead92@lemmy.world 38 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I mean that's all well and good, but then how would the very deserving shareholders get dividends?

Won't somebody think of the shareholders!?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)
[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 77 points 4 months ago (4 children)

The only reason all companies prices go up these days is for CEO pay packages

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] woodenskewer@lemmy.world 209 points 4 months ago (2 children)

“substantial harm to television program copyright owners,”

Give me a fucking break

[–] Retrograde@lemmy.world 46 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Won't somebody think of the television program copyright owners??

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kakes@sh.itjust.works 201 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Love how they make this sound like some incredible feat. When you aren't bound to license agreements, turns out it's actually very easy to have a "massive" content library. Literally the only hurdle is storage space.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 107 points 4 months ago (9 children)

I mean, distributing it isn't a small feat. Plus you need to manage subscriptions, billings, CMS, a front end to navigate the content, etc.

That's no small amount of work, even if they used out of the box solutions for many layers.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 149 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (13 children)

Nobody gives a shit, you're not doing enough to punish trump for his obvious, literally filmed and recorded crimes.

This is the equivalent of the cops celebrating after beating peaceful college protesters while pissing their pants and freezing while the uvalde kids were slaughtered and psychologically tortured.

You're focusing on the non victory and ignoring the failures. Cowards.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Grippler@feddit.dk 135 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (10 children)

"The group used “sophisticated computer scripts” and software to scour piracy services"

They used the basic tools that most(?) pirates use today like sonarr and radar??

I don't mind people pirating...i do mind people pirating and profiting from redistribution.

[–] yukichigai@lemmy.sdf.org 42 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Guessing they used Sonarr, Radarr, qBittorrent, maybe an NZB client....

Would you look at that, I'm sophisticated now.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] slurpinderpin@lemmy.world 119 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (50 children)

I run a massive streaming service too, which is also way bigger than all the streamers combined. It's just only distributed over my private home network. Jellyfin for the win!

load more comments (50 replies)
[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 117 points 4 months ago

Five men convicted by the court of the high seas for being absolute chads

[–] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 116 points 4 months ago (5 children)

The only thing I'm pisseed about is the fact that I was unaware of its existence. Fuck the system

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 116 points 4 months ago (12 children)

It probably also had better user experience than all of them

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 106 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They're here doing everyone a service. Why are there resources to prosecute this but not like elon musk's insider trading?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 103 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You gotta be stupid as shit to run something like this from the US and keep a financial tail of credit card payments to you.

You also gotta be stupid as shit to actually pay 10 bux for this.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 58 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (10 children)

It ran functionally uncontested for ten years. And it would hardly have been the first underground streaming service to pivot legit and cash out.

Napster was sold for $85M back in 2002. Justin.tv rebranded as Twitch in 2011. Hell, AWS has it's share of pirate hosted files.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 96 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It's sad that these people got taken down. Maybe the next people to do it will do it from a country that does not have extradition with the United States, so they would be safe.

Edit: As for payment providers attempting to take such a service down, Monero would be the answer to this.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 94 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Jetflicks, which charged $9.99 per month for the streaming service, generated millions of dollars in subscription revenue and caused “substantial harm to television program copyright owners,

The ownership class will tremble before a communist revolution!

[–] LonelyWendigo@lemmy.world 50 points 4 months ago (21 children)

Yeah that competition really did demonstrate what an awful service all those media monopolies provided.

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lemmylommy@lemmy.world 91 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If they had more content on offer than the big legal streaming services combined, should that not tell us something about the quality of legal offers?

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 62 points 4 months ago (2 children)

What's there to learn that isn't already widely known? Existing (copyright) laws are asinine and all corporations eventually become consumed by greed. That's America in a nutshell.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 36 points 4 months ago (7 children)

It's not even copyright laws, it's everyone insisting on exclusive contracts. There's no reason a piece of content couldn't be on Netflix and Disney+ at the same time. It would be a lot better for consumers if streamers could compete on price and service instead of which content they managed to create/licence.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 78 points 4 months ago

Farewell heroes. I may not have heard of you before, but I shall mourn your departure nevertheless.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 75 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It harmed no one and nothing.

TV and Film are just angry that competition did it for a reasonable price and provided a superior service for it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 74 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Honestly pretty funny to call the site "Jetflix" and advertise it as nothing but aviation videos. Nobody would know what you're up to until they pay you.

How much you wanna bet a aerospace nut subscribed to this because they love Jets, and immediately reported this site to the authorities because he got the avengers movies rather than Airbus maintenance videos or something...

Pretty stupid though to run this site out of the USA. Terrible opsec. They really just seemed to trust that nobody who cares would ever figure out what they were doing. Plenty of similar sites out there that don't even need to hide what they are because they are well outside of American jurisdiction.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] el_abuelo@lemmy.ml 74 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is despicable. What specific service was this? So I know how to avoid it if it should resurface.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 44 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (8 children)

Not only does it say that in the first paragraph, it says it here

Five men were convicted for their part in operating Jetflicks, one of the largest illegal streaming services in the U.S., officials said.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 62 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

“Sophisticated scripts to scour pirate sites”.

I think we’ve just found a new tagline for radarr and sonarr.

[–] digger@lemmy.ca 60 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The group used "sophisticated computer scripts" and software to scour piracy services... for illegal copies of TV episodes, which they then downloaded and hosted on Jetflicks’ servers.

So they used some variant of Sick Beard?

[–] aodhsishaj@lemmy.world 60 points 4 months ago (2 children)

nah probably the arr stack

Sonarr: (Automatic TV series downloads)

Radarr: (Automatic movie downloads)

Tdarr: (Automatic transcoding of media, can help save you a lot of disk space)

Bazarr: (Companion app to Radarr and Sonarr, manages subtitles)

Prowlarr: (A replacement for Jackett from the Arr team)

Lidarr: Music

Readarr: Books

Mylar3: Comic books

Plex-Meta-Manager: (Automatic collections and metadata)

Overseerr: Request tracking and website front-end

Ombi: Let users request both movies/tv shows from a simple web interface.

Dopplarr: Discord bot to make movie/tv/anime requests

Pulsarr: Browser extension for adding movies to Radarr or Series' to Sonarr while browsing IMDB or TVDB.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] boatsnhos931@lemmy.world 58 points 4 months ago (10 children)

Why didn't you nerds tell me about this, I'm over here hoofing it with this got damn 2tb ssd

[–] HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world 40 points 4 months ago (5 children)

only 2tb? that's the size of my cache drives

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 57 points 4 months ago (8 children)

If there is no need,such places would not exist

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] paris@lemmy.blahaj.zone 54 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The group used “sophisticated computer scripts” and software to scour piracy services (including the Pirate Bay and Torrentz) for illegal copies of TV episodes, which they then downloaded and hosted on Jetflicks’ servers, according to federal prosecutors.

They probably used Sonarr and Radarr and called it a day (or similar off-the-shelf tools available on GitHub). It's not very sophisticated at all. That combined with Jellyfin and a VPN (or Usenet or a country that doesn't care about piracy) and you have your own up and running. You could also just use free sites with an ad blocker instead of paying $10/mo like the service this article is about charged.

Unrelated to all of this: https://rentry.co/megathread

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 54 points 4 months ago (2 children)

If five people can maintain a service bigger than all those combined, then the big streamers need to buck their fucking ideas up.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 53 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I've got one of those too. Plex is great.

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 40 points 4 months ago (29 children)

ITT: Have you heard the good news about our lord and saviour, Jellyfin?

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] muculent@lemmy.world 48 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

Streaming services become required by law like insurance

Wait, why am I required to pay for a streaming service?

Because it has all of the entertainment electrolytes a human needs

[–] DasSkelett@discuss.tchncs.de 41 points 4 months ago (1 children)

We already have the private copying levy in Germany and some other countries, where you have to pay a fee for several products (printers, scanners, storage media like HDDs, SSDs, SD cards and thumb drives...) due to the potential that you could do (legal!) private copies of copyrighted media on them. The copyright collectives can set the amount of the fees freely (and it's ridiculously high).

This comes shockingly close to the concept already.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 39 points 4 months ago (2 children)

5 times the content. Where do I sign up?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›