this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
257 points (98.5% liked)

News

23301 readers
4659 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Two former Missouri police officers, Julian Alcala and David McKnight, were charged in separate federal cases for illegally searching women’s phones during traffic stops to obtain explicit images.

Alcala, formerly with Florissant police, faces 20 counts of deprivation of rights for allegedly taking nude photos and videos from phones and deleting evidence.

McKnight, an ex-Missouri State Highway Patrol trooper, faces nine similar counts.

At least 29 women’s phones were allegedly searched.

Both men resigned after investigations began. The FBI urges victims to report misconduct by officers. The cases are unconnected.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Travelator@thelemmy.club 39 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Do cops just routinely grab victim's phones at traffic stops and demand they be unlocked so they can sit in their car and scroll through the photos? How the hell is this legal? Why ?

This really pisses me off.

For the thick brained: "victim" in this context is the person pulled over.

[–] Dlayknee@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

From the article:

According to the federal indictment, Alcala would take women's phones during traffic stops to confirm their insurance coverage or vehicle registration. But he searched their phones for nude images and took photos on his own personal phone, the indictment said.

(Doesn't make it ok, but the cops weren't just walking up to the window and demanding to search their phones)

[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Its things like this that make me glad for Androids app-locking feature.

Lock it on your insurance card. They would need your passcode to leave the insurance app.

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

For those who are unaware or curious, iOS can do this with your Guided Access settings. You can set it up to be unable to leave the app it’s currently in when you start Guided Access.

[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 1 points 2 hours ago

Thank you! I was trying to Google it as I was sure Apple has something comparable

[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 17 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Do cops just routinely grab victim's phones at traffic stops and demand they be unlocked so they can sit in their car and scroll through the photos? How the hell is this legal? Why ?

No, that's not normal or legal. Which is why these guys are getting charged with deprivation of rights.

[–] meliaesc@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

That's an incredible vague charge, I hope they get convincted.

[–] Travelator@thelemmy.club 19 points 21 hours ago

Sure, they resigned. Does it end there? They should be jailed for years.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 day ago

Disgusting typical cop shit,

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 14 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Now I'm just curious about the stats. What percentage of women have nudies on their phones? I would have guessed you would need to search quite a lot of phones to get 29 with nudies on them, but I'm starting to think I'm wrong about that presumption.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I'd be willing to bet it's most women in their 20s and 30s. Although to be fair, it said 29 phones were searched, not 29 phones had nudes on them.

[–] LotrOrc@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Probably every woman above 18 has some nudes of themselves on their phone

[–] Kite@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Are you a woman? Not asking for any accusatory reasons or anything, I'm just curious about why you'd say that - if you're a girl with lots of friends with nude photos, a guy who's received a lot of photos, just a guy assuming, etc. Again, not asking to attack, even if you're just assuming. I don't have any nudes on mine, and I've had talks about this with a few friends and they were all "helllll NO" to the idea as well.

Edit: Though I do have some wicked sexy pictures of my bare legs. They are covered with horrible lumps called erythema nodosum, though, so probably no one would be looking for that lol

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 7 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Desperate and pathetic. Have these guys never heard of the internet?

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

They probably feel like it's "personalized", like it's "for them", which is an absolutely disgusting and horrifying thought.

[–] Kite@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago

The power of it probably does something for them as well.

[–] Dashi@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I'm guessing it's a power thing. They have "trophies" to get off too

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, that seems like the best explanation. In that case, I’d like to add “reprehensible” to my other insults.

[–] capital_sniff@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Also this should go on their permanent record. So they are never allowed to be in any position of authority anywhere again.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That would be nice, but in America, I’m not sure there’s anything like a permanent record for cops.

[–] capital_sniff@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

There's a permanent record for everybody that went to school in America. I remember it was drilled into us at a young age, that this or that could end up on our permanent record.

And if there isn't one for cops and other positions of authority there should be one. Make it a phone app.

[–] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 4 points 21 hours ago

Does this fall under protecting or serving?