this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
277 points (92.9% liked)

Games

16764 readers
896 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 40 minutes ago
[–] Taokan@sh.itjust.works 1 points 58 minutes ago

NGL, when I first saw Warner making a public fuss over this, I had a bit of a reaction. Like, no one comes after my boy steam, I like my games and I like my platform. And maybe it's because I don't engage in many public multiplayer games these days, but I just haven't really come across this extremist content frequently enough to feel Congress needs to get involved.

But...

I can see from the comments, my anecdotal experiences aren't the whole picture. And I do get that sometimes in an otherwise free market, regulation is necessary to prevent a situation where a company does the right thing and then suffers financially from the backlash/boycott that ensues. Better to let the government be the ones to take the heat by those that get upset by the moderation.

But I also kind of agree with the sentiment, Congress needs to clean up its own hate speech and ethics, before further legislating what everyone else should be doing.

[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 hours ago

ADL report

Opinion discarded. Those ADL fucks lie about damn near everything.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 25 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

You guys can't even keep nazis out of government. Why should it be steams responsibility to keep them from playing a game?

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

That's the whole point. Sure there's Nazis in the government but look over there, a Nazi! Look over there a Nazi! It's Nazis from top to bottom. Wanna let us censor the Internet to stop them? No? You're a Nazi sympathiser then.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 44 minutes ago

Well it's a nazi country founded by literal slave masters. What do people expect?

[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 23 points 10 hours ago

Translation: Our corpo overlords don't like that you can review bomb our shitty games and force us to take losses when we do shitty corpo things. Appease my bosses or they'll make me be bottom again with no lube.

[–] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 34 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Where? Where at tho? I've been using steam and playing valve games for like 16 years or something like that and I don't see it anywhere. Maybe the one troll in user made guides but that usually goes away just like any other platform

[–] Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml 23 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

you can go through the community hubs/reviews of basically any WW2/military shooter or strategy game and see multiple people with Hitler avatars, swastikas, black suns, anything you can think of. it's extremely prevalent.

hell, just going through the HOI4 community hub and in the first 30 seconds of scrolling I've come across at least 3 nazi posts. the forums are completely unmoderated, going through the discussions and I've already found multiple instances of straight up holocaust denial/glorification. it's absolutely rampant.

[–] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 minutes ago

Oh damn okay. I just didn't see it because I don't play those games

[–] nature_man@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Honestly its not just any WW2 game, but any remotely popular game's updates pages, when steam points & awards got added, several people set up bots to spam every update post on large games to say "Add pronouns and rainbow flags" banking on the conservatives giving them the jester award, others have it set up to spam "Dont give into woke and add (whatever buzzword is currently popular)" so they can get other awards, and like the morons they are, conservatives keep falling for both, giving awards and reacting in the comments.

LGBTQ+ people and allies have mostly stopped opening the comments on updates due to this, so there are multiple instances of people just openly calling for the extermination of anyone LGBTQ+ that never get reported or removed on the updates pages of otherwise not rightwing games.

Forums are supposed to be moderated by the company that makes the game, this means that if someone makes a nazi post and the company has no moderators, or has moderators that are also nazis, reporting it does nothing, even if it's blatantly against Steam's TOS.

Something seriously needs to be done about it.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 76 points 22 hours ago (11 children)

Once again, a clueless boomer blames games.

How about YouTube? Why aren't we going after Google?

What about Twitter? Musk's platform is filled with extremist hate.

Plenty of extremist diarrhea spewing from the mouth of a President Elect.

It's almost like this kind of content on Steam is a symptom of a bigger problem.

[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 40 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Steam honestly has it really bad. You don't see blatant hate speech in play store reviews but you certainly do on steam. The same goes for their forums, which are almost totally unmoderated. Totally agree tho that this is a symptom of a larger problem and am always wary of the government seeking to impede free speech, even if it's speech I despise. If there are calls to violence and stuff I'm totally cool with that being prosecuted ofc.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 21 hours ago

Yes, agreed, it definitely needs moderation. But I don't think it needs singling out (again, not saying don't moderate).

The bigger picture is a proliferation of online extremist speech in general. And yes, Google may have done well to moderate play store reviews (anecdotally), but they certainly haven't done well with YouTube.

But I would suggest that focusing on any one online forum / store / outlet / etc. will naturally miss an important trend, and the reasons for that trend should be understood -- while concurrently doing everything possible to limit this kind of hate online.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 20 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Yes, people say mean things on the internet. That's never going away. Teach your children how to deal with it.

[–] Blazingtransfem98@discuss.online 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think that Nazi shit or promotion of terrorism falls under "mean things on the internet" that would be over-trivializing, and I do say that because I have indeed seen many people doing these things in my years on Steam, as well as encouraging violence towards me for being a girl and having "used to have been a boy" (being transgender).

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 hours ago

are they "mean things" and are they on the internet? If so it's mean things on the internet, this doesn't mean it won't cause IRL damage, but until it transitions from hateful words to actionable threats it's just an occupational hazard of the internet.

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

People need to understand that the internet is a public space. Family PCs should be in a shared space like the living room and kids need to have parental controls enabled on their smart phone. Beyond that, yeah people need to get thicker skins when it comes to social media (including steam in this).

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Strong disagree on parental controls. As a parent, if I don't trust my kids, they won't get a device. Period. If I trust them, they will get a device without any limitations. Period.

I really don't see the point in parental controls, all it does is encourage kids to learn how to get around parental controls. Instead of that, teach kids what it takes to earn your trust and go that route.

I'm a parent, and here are my only controls:

  • Switch - passcode because my 4yo kept playing games when not allowed; I told the older kids the code, and will probably remove it soon
  • my computers passwords - when my kids are allowed to play games or whatever, I'll unlock it and tell them what they can and can't use it for, with zero controls other than the underlying threat of losing privileges entirely if they misuse it
  • tablet - each has a passcode, but the kids don't use them much (only on trips)
  • TV - again, 4yo kept watching when not allowed, and the older kids watched as well (but only when the 4yo did it), so they all lost access; will probably remove this soon

We do no internet filters, no enforced time limits (they have their own timers though), and no locks on specific programs. Either I trust them with everything or nothing. They know what they're allowed to use, and they know the consequences.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 2 hours ago

I owe my IT career to my parents trying to restrict my access with parental controls. I learned a lot figuring out how to circumvent those things and cover my tracks.

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

I'm not convinced by your approach but I respect that you've put a lot of thought into it. I guess my main issue is that it seems some parents don't think about it at all.

[–] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Oh boy, good luck with that outlook in today's age. You can trust them to get into shit, I believe helicopter parenting has become prevalent because we've lost the "village" it takes to raise a kid. You used to be able to trust a parent to step in if they were over at someone else's house and a discussion got nasty or a fight broke out. You would have neighbors who looked after the kids and would let you know if they were up to some shit. Now the kids talk on discord and other apps, completely unsupervised or at times even inaccessible (after the fact) if they've set it up right. You've got algorithm's trained on millions of users to suck your kids in, never ending entertainment with minimal effort.

As a parent, who is completely conscious of everything going on around social media and technology, you will absolutely need to step in. Most adults can't even handle it, you WILL have to be the parent who sets boundaries on the stimuli their brain craves but has a negative impact on their overall health. You don't instill healthy eating into a child by giving them unlimited money and telling them to make their own decisions. You work with them, share your experience, let them cook sometimes but monitor over and see the results of their activity. Are they making healthy choices or ordering door dash?

Make it more difficult for them by setting restrictions they have to learn to bypass, even if it feels ridiculous it's a whole different setup for effort-reward. It will interest them into getting into deeper components of technology and how everything works. It's absolutely what kids are suppose to do, just like we always figure out a way to get away with shit which ultimately improves various skills.

[–] DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Just set up redirects on DNS levels for the fedi alternatives. E.g. Reddit->selfhosted Lemmy, Musk's trumpet called X->selfhosted Mastodon instance, Instagram->Pixelfed and TikTok->Loops. I mainly use Instagram, because we have a class group on it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 21 points 20 hours ago

On Jan. 3rd, this will switch to a Republican senator saying the same thing, but the "extremist content" will be "woke."

[–] A_Filthy_Weeaboo@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know the article addresses it but... What about X'ter? Head of Twatter now has an official government position while his shitty company allows Neo Nazi, hate, homophobic, and misogynist behavior runs rampant!

What a fucking farce...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wow this push against Valve kind of popped up quickly and suddenly didn't it?

[–] Blazingtransfem98@discuss.online 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Honestly it's about fucking time. The unmoderated hate speech on their platform has gone on long enough. Many people don't realize just how bad it is but I recently hopped on some servers and I got called "tranny" and "groomer" because people knew me and they knew I "used to be a boy" (not true, I never was a boy, just in-denial). I've also seen people pushing Nazi shit on Steam community discussions and in-game on official servers, it's insanely bad.

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

You know were the ones wholl get censored and not the nazis though

[–] vulgarcynic@sh.itjust.works 12 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah let's suggest these kids spending their time somewhere way safer like Matt Gaetz's mansion.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ParkedInReverse@lemmy.world 167 points 1 day ago (41 children)

Kinda stretching it aren't they?

Palistine? Really?

load more comments (40 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›