this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
164 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19240 readers
2328 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 81 points 5 days ago

Make no mistake: if you are one of the millions who has paid into this system your whole life, these people are stealing from you.

[–] astrsk@fedia.io 62 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Then refund my decades of contributions you fucks.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 33 points 5 days ago (1 children)

No, don't ask for that -- you'd be playing yourself. They owe you the value of your contributions plus market-rate returns for that whole period (at least 7%, compounded continuously). That's an absolutely huge difference.

[–] astrsk@fedia.io 5 points 5 days ago

You’re absolutely right!

[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 57 points 5 days ago

They just figured out they can say “we won’t do a thing” and then get elected and then do the exact thing and people somehow will blame the Democrats.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 45 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Oh man, were just speed running this recommend, aren't we? It's weird when people who, fully aware of how the French dealt with this "let them eat cake" bullshit... Actively work to recreate that scenario that didn't end well for their counter parts

[–] Rottcodd@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago

One would think they'd at least wait until the planned concentration camps are built.

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 14 points 5 days ago

This time, they think they have enough of the general populace controlled that they can get away with it. So far, they've been proven right every time.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 36 points 5 days ago

Asked if cuts to Social Security and Medicare would be "on the table" for the DOGE Caucus, Lopez replied, "We're about to find out."

Fuck around.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

This is some real galaxy-brained "populism" in action right here.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Let the old fucks who overwhelmingly voted for this suffer. Maybe they're still cognizant enough to realize what they did to themselves

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 15 points 5 days ago

Old people aren't the only recipients from social security programs.

[–] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago

Fuck that I didn't vote for this and my disabled ass is still going to be punished for it

Nah, they'll probably increase the age to receive it and reduce payouts starting just after an election so hopefully everyone that gets screwed forgets about it by the next one.

[–] morphballganon@lemmynsfw.com 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Where my 2nd Amendment folks at

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

cowering in their basement vigorously lubing their guns up their ass and begging Trump for more.

[–] twistypencil@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You ain't talking away my retirements, unless you giving me some of yours, you asshats

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 32 points 5 days ago (1 children)

No worries, I"m sure after the Republicans are done, you'll never get to retire anyways.

[–] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Motherfucking ladder-pullers; pulling up ladders with their wealthy geriatric smiles.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Hey man, ladders are dangerous. They could fall off one and break a hip.

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 12 points 5 days ago

Bullshit! The party of face eating leopards explicitly said they would not eat MY face!

[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Cut ss, and get the CEO treatment.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How can I stop paying into this system as a US citizen?

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

Tax resistance

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

> "some cuts"
> the cuts:

[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Make it hurt.

Make America remember who has their back.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Geez you'd expect the Dems to jump on joining this so they can at least provide some oversight

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I would imagine because this blue ribbon committee is going to be full of shit ideas, these Republicans aren't going to take any feedback in a honest fashion, yeah looking at you Moskowitz, and why in the hell would any Democrat want to give them ammo about the absolutely shit ideas as being bipartisan, again looking at you Moskowitz.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 points 4 days ago

Oh there's no doubt it will be full of shit ideas, but at least if they are involved they can register their opposition to those shit ideas and ensure everything is reported correctly.