this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
483 points (99.2% liked)

politics

21039 readers
3364 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Judge Tanya Chutkan, who presided over Donald Trump’s election interference case, has been assigned a major lawsuit challenging Elon Musk’s authority in the federal government.

The suit, filed by 14 states, claims Musk wields unprecedented executive power, including control over federal funds and agencies.

Chutkan, a frequent Trump critic, previously imposed a gag order on him.

While Trump and Musk have yet to comment, right-wing figures are already attacking Chutkan, signaling an upcoming political and legal battle over executive power.

top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 90 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

While seeing Judge Tanya Chutkan get this case could be a good sign. Her ruling, if negative to Trump, will probably see the end of her career. The more interesting thing will be if this gets appealed to the Supreme Court. Their ruling will determine how much power the courts have going forward to actually rein in presdients.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 60 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

She's has a lifetime appointment.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 84 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The president can order her to be assassinated and pardon whoever does it per SCOTUS.

[–] Placebonickname@lemmy.world 43 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

This is what I’m saying man. We should resist, but it cannot be just one person, it has to be many so that Trump cannot get rid of all of us at once.

[–] Banana@sh.itjust.works 26 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I want to see fear in that man's eyes.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 45 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 5 points 3 weeks ago

I forgot that picture. I dunno how when it's pretty much my entire mood lately.

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 26 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Banana@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 weeks ago

That photo is beautiful

[–] orgrinrt@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Oh man, whoever’s shielding him has some tight pants on. I wouldn’t mind seeing more of them

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

You don't see it in every single photo that exists of him? Because fear is literally what drives him.

[–] Banana@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 weeks ago

Oh I see nothing behind those eyes most of the time

[–] hemmes@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

And McDonald’s is his fuel

[–] b3an@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

This. We have to stand together and resist this blatant illegal overreach by an unelected bureaucrat

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 52 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

LOL, the pampered diaper donvict? When was his life ever "hell"?

He should be rotting away in prison, instead, he continues unbothered and unscathed and is now king of the world.

[–] Jericho_Kane@lemmy.org 19 points 3 weeks ago

I remember back when you would read every day a new headlin on how they really got him now. Making hell for him apparently means not kissing his feet.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 44 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Life hell? Do any of you feel that Trump’s life has ever been “hell?”

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 34 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

He's gotten away with a lot and supposedly has a lot of money, but to be honest I really don't envy him. He seems miserable inside.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I actually have some sympathy for young Trump, in the same way I feel a little bad for young Kissinger because he was beaten up by Nazis. Fuck everything about who he’s become and what he's done, burn him at the stake. But from what I’ve heard about his childhood and family that was probably a really shitty way to be a kid

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah it sucks that his mom was pretty absent and his dad was basically a sociopath, but not everyone with garbage parents grows up to oversee the deaths of millions.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No doubt, he’s not absolved in any capacity. I just feel bad for the actual child he once was, not the man that child became

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I feel this way about Barron Trump every time I see him. He's barely got any chance of leading a decent, moral life. I guarantee mental health issues have already begun to manifest. For fuck's sake his dad named the kid after his alter ego, John Barron.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I comfort myself with the fact that pretty much every waking moment of his life has been hell-- he's just too dumb to realize it.

He's never accomplished or learned anything, known love or had a friend, and his family either hates him or are sycophantic extensions of his own ego. A lifetime of shitting in gold toilets will never change the fact that he's a failure that made everything and everyone he touched worse, and will be logged in history books as the puppet figurehead that more intelligent fascists used for their own purposes.

[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

He shits in his pants now!

[–] evilcultist@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

He (and his allies) had to take 10 years of Greta Thunberg scolding him. He’s pretty thin skinned.

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't think it's been 10y. I just checked and she's 22 now. She started protesting with she was 15. So more like 7y. That would have been during the 1st Trump admin I guess.

[–] evilcultist@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

I don’t either. It’s a quote from JD Vance.

[–] moody@lemmings.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's a figure of speech. Nobody thinks she made his life actual, literal hell.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] rigatti@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

The person you're responding to is not actual literal Sherlock Holmes, FYI.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I see what you’ve done there. ;)

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 2 points 3 weeks ago

Was going to say... a bit like saying "the one who's closest to reaching jupiter".

[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

After an onslaught of bad news it's novel to see something positive happening.

[–] stickly@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Nothing positive is happening until it happens, we have yet to see Trump comply with a judicial ruling (let alone an emergency injunction). And it'll get argued up to the SCOTUS before he'd even theoretically stop.

Don't fall for Lucy pulling the football for the 9th year in a row. Plan and act as if he's not facing any consequences within the limits of our government, because his record shows he won't.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

same vibe is all. its an old meme. we are the "sickos" who will enjoy watching this go down.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Fellas, is it sick to enjoy the downfall of tyrannical leaders?

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Lmfao, we won't see that anytime soon. Itll take years at best.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

No. But I want to stick them into the Kenshi skinner machine and make Planet of the Apes taxidermy for the future Smithsonian exhibit on them.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 weeks ago

It’s from an onion comic artist, “Kelly”, who makes amazing comic parodies of right-wing garbage comics like Ben Garrison

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The judge didn't make life hell for trump. trump did that for himself.

Ridiculous fucking headline.

Note: This message was sent from the Gulf of Mexico

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

Being elected a supreme leader is apparently hell for donald trump

[–] Vinstaal0@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Can we also sue Musk and Trump for their bullshit if we don’t live in the US? Fuckers like that are destroying more than just the US