this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
507 points (99.4% liked)

News

29289 readers
5777 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Catholic Church has issued a warning to its clergy in Washington state: Any priest who complies with a new law requiring the reporting of child abuse confessions to authorities will be excommunicated.

https://www.newsweek.com/catholic-church-excommunicate-priests-following-new-us-state-law-2069039

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 18 minutes ago

A curious question. Why isn't everyone a mandatory reporter for child abuse? And assuming there is a good reason why, then why are doctors and such specifically seperated out. And do priests fit that same criteria?

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 20 minutes ago

So it was unclear to me from the article if it simply made priests mandatory reporters or if it went further. My understanding is that mandatory reporters don't have to report past occurrences specifically. They only havecto report if it is currently happening or they suspect going to happen. If that is the case, it should be fine. Confession isn't about what you are going to do.

[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 111 points 21 hours ago (6 children)

Why aren't all the preists who diddle kids excommunicated?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

No one would go to church if they thought their kids wouldn’t get experience

[–] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 12 hours ago

Because that's the whole point of the church. It's just one big sham so they can diddle kids

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 19 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Catholic Church = Child Molester Haven.

Pretty simple.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 16 points 15 hours ago

Oh, it's most churches. And the GOP.

[–] Zenith@lemm.ee 10 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

They’d have no priests left

[–] _____@lemm.ee 10 points 19 hours ago

The oughta write a song about it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] merdaverse@lemmy.world 124 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

Therapists are required to break confidentiality if they suspect child abuse. The church thinks it is above secular law and only answers to God, not to mention the protection it offers to its own child abusers. It's complete nonsense and a good example of why religious tolerance has limits.

[–] Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

This is completely accurate, and yet so many responses are pretending it's not.

A mandated reporter is a person who is required by law to report crimes, typically if they know or suspect a child or vulnerable adult has been or is at risk of being abused or neglected

Mandated reporters have to report child abuse. Full goddamn stop. No, it doesn't matter if it's in the past, why the fuck would that change anything?

These people really think that it's okay not to report pedophilia? Why? Because the pedophile confessed to inarguably one of the worst crimes imaginable, and promised not to do it anymore?

You think a therapist wouldn't report that because their patient said they won't do it anymore? Did they pinky swear?

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 15 minutes ago

These people really think that it’s okay not to report pedophilia? Why? Because the pedophile confessed to inarguably one of the worst crimes imaginable, and promised not to do it anymore?

So that paedophiles don't stay away from confession, so that priests can tell them that god wants them to go to the police as penance. Noone is helped when paedophiles instead keep their mouths shut.

You think a therapist wouldn’t report that because their patient said they won’t do it anymore? Did they pinky swear?

Over here in Germany, therapists may break confidentiality over planned or grave crimes, but are not required to. It's always a balancing act and from what I've heard in the US you can get arrested for telling your therapist that you took drugs which is insane.

Mandatory reporting doesn't solve problems and while doing that causes a ton of others. There's a gazillion things you can do to address things, making snitching mandatory is about the least useful and most damaging.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

This is not true. A therapist would be required to break confidentially if they became aware that their Client is going to harm themselves or others, or if they are mandated by law.

What someone already did in the past generally isn't reported.

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 1 points 53 seconds ago

I find zero sources that agree with your claim.

I find several sources that indicate that therapists in all US states are required to break confidentiality when child abuse has occurred.

https://psychcentral.com/health/what-do-therapists-have-to-report

https://www.remnantcounselorcollective.com/resources/86536/the-ultimate-guide-to-mandated-reporting-laws-in-all-50-us-states-child-adult-abuse-neglect

https://www.stopitnow.org/ohc-content/when-must-a-therapist-file-a-report

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/what-therapists-report-confidentiality_l_5d2cf063e4b0bca603641a62

https://www.mentalyc.com/blog/exceptions-to-confidentiality-in-counseling

So either you're talking about another country's laws (in which case I'd like to know which country), or you're just incorrect.

I'm in Colombia, where psychologists are required to report "human rights violations, mistreatment or cruel, inhuman or degrading conditions of confinement of which any person is a victim and of which they become aware in the exercise of their profession."

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Shit like this is why it is explicitly written that Baha'is must follow the law of the land before the laws of god.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 23 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

That's not quite accurate. Therapists are required to break confidentiality if they believe there is an ongoing risk to others, not because someone tells them of child abuse they committed in the past. In that sense, a confessional would probably be the same - you don't confess to things that haven't happened yet. You're more likely to express ongoing risk in therapy than in confession.

If the confessor indicated that they were going to continue doing things, that's when a confession should become reportable, if we're want the law to be secular and equitable.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 33 minutes ago

Technically everything you've done is in the past, unless you're doing it at this very second in time. So by that rationale, a priest could say, well, they're confessing, it's in the past, they're repentant--not an ongoing risk--therefore I don't have to report. But that's obviously bullshit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] orclev@lemmy.world 264 points 1 day ago (35 children)

I read the headline and was prepared to support the church on this one (for once). Then I read the first paragraph of the article. I have never made a 180 on an opinion so fast. The fuck is wrong with the Catholic church and child abuse? Why is this a constant problem with them?

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

To be fair, lawyers get to avoid this (I assume). This isn't the same obviously, but if you view it from their frame of reference it is even more important. They must confess if they want to be "saved from God", and similarly you should be honest with your lawyer to be saved from the court.

I don't know where I stand on this issue. I obviously want them to be caught, and the religion is bogus, and the organization causes tremendous harm. However, if someone believes it's true then this is pretty significant overreach and directly interferes with religious practice. They start with the crime most people will agree with, and then it sets a precident to go after other crimes in the same fashion. I'm too skeptical of the state to trust it'll always be a good thing.

To be fair, lawyers get to avoid this (I assume).

Lawyers don't get to avoid this. They need to, in fact they are forced to, otherwise the entire legal system fails. There is no justice without privileged defense. That's literally in the fifth amendment.

The desire for clergy not to be mandated reporters goes in the opposite direction from what you suggest. The slippery slope here doesn't lead to breaking freedom of religion, it leads to a religious organization hiding crimes whenever they want.

Leaving an exception in for the confessional when it comes to mandatory reporting would allow any religious group that had a mandate for secrecy to say, ‘We don’t have to report anything.’”

Confession requires penitance. They must confess and repent to God, but there is no reason why the penitance for Catholic confession can't involve actually fucking answering for your crimes.

[–] Photuris@lemmy.ml 121 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Imagine if any other type of organization had this sort of systemic problem with child abuse.

“Wow, there sure are a lot of pedophile employees at Apple Computer abusing their customers’ children.”

“Dang, the US Department of Transportation sure does have a kiddie diddler problem.”

“Holy shit, what’s the deal with all the abusive perverts working at Ronald McDonald House?”

Sounds absolutely bonkers, right‽

If any secular organization was having this kind of problem at scale, we’d all be calling for their blood. Yet the church gets a pass somehow. A few complaints, a few lawsuits, some big scandals, some negative press, but fundamentally nothing ever changes.

To hell with the church.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

They do affiliate themselves with Christianity - maybe not Catholicism specifically, but the Catholic Church is hardly the only denomination of this cult that can’t keep their hands/mouths off of kids’ genitals.

Frankly if I ever had kids I’d have a gaggle of drag queens babysit before I let any even slightly religiously affiliated group near them.

[–] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world 23 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I think Boy Scouts have done a better job reforming than the Catholic church.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Recently maybe, but there was decades of abuse before that.

[–] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Yup, that's what reforming means

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Do the Boy Scouts have a legally protected mechanism to talk with each other about their child fucking that I’m not aware of?

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca -2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Like a Signal chat? Wtf are you even asking?

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 20 minutes ago

I’m talking about how Catholic priests can legally refuse to report child abuse revealed to them in confessional in most states, the subject of this post.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I mean, you joke, kind of, but a massive, MASSIVE amount of QAnon bullshit that drives current rightwingers in the US is literally nothing but inventing fake demonic pedophile cults and putting anyone they don't like in these made up cults...

All so that they can demonize others, and what this functionally does is give these nutjobs an infinite well of whataboutisms to either shift a conversation about pederasty and child abuse in any christian church/sect ... over to 'the even worserer badderer people'...

...or just do something akin to a 'no true scotsman' and claim that anyone in any church who is a pedo or child abuser... well actually they're not a real christian, they're a secret demonic cult member who is embedded in the organization to both commit evil and also to discredit the church when they are exposed.

The purpose of a system is what it does, not what it claims to do.

These people invented what is essentially their own new religion, a religion dlc, which entirely serves as a mechanism to avoid and make impossible discussions of actual child sa, abuse, going on in the institutions they revere.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 46 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The entire religion is based on shame and fear. The clergy take advantage of both.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 day ago

It's a constant problem because its a cult that wants to protect its cult members. It finds no issue with indoctrinating kids, to the point where nobody batted an eye when they recently (like, in the past 10 years) decreased the age at which children go through the sacrament of Confirmation. The same sacrament that is meant to affirm your adulthood in the church, where you say, "I may have been told to practice this by my parents before, but now I'm an adult now and choose to practice it of my own volition."

They do this when children are thirteen years old. Thirteen.

When I was fifteen I did not have the capacity to make this decision for myself. Now I have to live with the fact I'm on a list somewhere as an adult in the church. The Catholic Church is an evil institution that uses trauma for the purpose of coercion.

load more comments (31 replies)
[–] selkiesidhe@lemm.ee 35 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (5 children)

Wait a sec. What the fuck? So reporting child rape is now BAD???

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 15 points 12 hours ago

They hold confession to be inviolate, which is fucking bullshit. Doctors, including psychiatrists, who aren't allowed to share that shit do have to report certain criminal acts to police.

Unfortunately all too often freedom of religion translates to freedom from consequences. Fuck the Catholic church (and all churches) in general, but in particular for shit like this. Three Catholic church isn't unique in this, it's just got the most rigidly hierarchical, top-down structure of them all.

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 49 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Note for the internet: I am just clarifying the Catholic stance. I am not Catholic and not defending them.

Priests cannot reveal what someone tells them in confession. It's a lot like attorney-client privilege, as your priest is supposed to be your advocate before God. Breaking the seal of confession is a big deal (to them) because, just like criminals deserve representation, sinners need to be able to confess.

[–] Mustakrakish@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Sinners should be allowed to confess, but not be absolved of consequence or even just be allowed to continue.

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 2 points 4 hours ago

If things worked the way they should you don't just confess your sin and go about your day. The priest assigns a penance. We are at the edge of my knowledge, and I would love for a Catholic to chime in, but I know penance can be harsh, especially for a grave sin. I'm not sure how it works in practice.

The idea is certainly not to just allow it to continue. Here we get to obvious failings of the Catholic Church. But, honestly, it's not like the government is that great about protecting children from powerful men either.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 7 points 13 hours ago

Confession is for stuff you've done, not are going to do. Presumably they recognize it was wrong or they wouldn't go to confession about it.

I agree it sucks, but I also agree with the comment above yours. Yes, this crime is bad and the people deserve to be caught. I don't trust the state to always do the right thing though. If we agree with this, we should also agree when they do the same for petty theft, assisting with an illegal abortion, or whatever other crimes they want. This is a slippery slope (not the fallacy) to the state removing protections of any confession, and these people believe if they don't confess they'll go to hell, regardless of if they'll never do it again or if it wasn't that significant.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 39 points 21 hours ago

Looks like I'm going to continue not being catholic.

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

The U.S. Department of Justice said it is investigating whether the law infringes on First Amendment religious protections.

Imagine thinking you could sin recklessly, tell it to some dude in a funny hat/robe and that God is somehow okay with it. Imagine keeping the identities of child abusers secret because of that stupid line of thought (or because you can relate to the person touching kids).

[–] Helvetica@sh.itjust.works 16 points 22 hours ago

Oh, I thought maybe this had to do with standing up against some regressive anti-immigration law, but nope, it's just the Catholic church being weird about sexual abuse. Again.

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.today 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

And for extra reading, learn about how the new pope covered up for priests that abused kids when he was a bishop:

https://www.jpost.com/international/article-853274

*Edit: removed the bad source. The Jpost article is good and includes several additional sources. For more: https://www.qwant.com/?q=+Robert+Prevost+abuse+cover+up

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 day ago (9 children)

And there goes any hope of Ameripope not being a piece of shit. Delightful.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›