this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
412 points (99.0% liked)

News

30180 readers
6247 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A U.S. judge on Thursday temporarily barred Donald Trump from deploying National Guard troops in Los Angeles, finding that the Guard was unlawfully mobilized by Trump.

Judge Charles Breyer ordered the National Guard to return to the control of California Governor Gavin Newsom, who sued to restrict its activity. Breyer's order will take effect at noon on Friday.

"The Court is troubled by the implication inherent in Defendants' argument that protest against the federal government, a core civil liberty protected by the First Amendment, can justify a finding of rebellion," Breyer wrote.

The Trump administration immediately appealed the judge's order.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hikuro93@lemmy.world 122 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Lemme guess. He's gonna appeal and another judge will pause this decision while they take their time to review the appeal, because Trump shows daily how deserving he is of the benefit of the doubt.

Meanwhile things keep escalating and people get hurt.

Right?

Keep giving fingers, keep losing arms. Trump relies on shortsightedness to advance, and there's plenty to go around. You falter, he swallows you whole before you can even react. Be cordial, get taken advantage of, like a sucker. 100 out of 100 times. Guaranteed.

[–] qantravon@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Aaand it already happened...

[–] Hikuro93@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Yup. Just saw it and came back to check if someone had already replied the obvious before I could. Thank you.

What a joke of a justice system. Things are where they are because as slow as Fat Blob Trump is, he's still faster than the law. By the time they finally decide to actually state his actions are illegal it'll be last year's news already, while another judge's order gets paused on the latest scandal of the day.

If the law were any good neither him or his ilk would even get the chance to run a first term. Because many of them would be jailed for all sorts of crimes, and the rest wouldn't dare to act with fear of the consequences. Weak men create hard times.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Big difference this term is that Trump has his team locked in, there’s consistency to the approach and commitment to their evil goals. The first term we were measuring tenures in mooches, this term there have been barely any departures so far. That lets them push and push and push.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago

*legal system.

rarely there is ever any "justice."

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 67 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Countdown to "Far left Judge Breyer is a disgusting radical leftist who hates America and should be removed from his position!!"

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Whatever he said, another group of fascist judges have already given him back control

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/judge-blocks-trump-administration-deploying-members-california-nationa-rcna212775

Gotta love that everyone opposing Trump is named personally but the shadow “three person” appeals court isnt

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 16 points 1 day ago

"Breyer is leading an insurrection and must be put down!" /s

[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah! Tell Trump he's breaking the law! That'll teach him!

(smh)

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You don't just tell him. You also need a sternly worded letter too.

Have you considered resorting to a hard stare? I mean, it works every time in the Paddington movies.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The courts move at a relative snail's pace compared to how fast they need to be under Trump, and they need to use their judicial power to deputize people to actually start enforcing the law against the executive.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Whats the overunder on Trump respecting this?

[–] StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I’m more concerned with the military command respecting the court decision. They are the ones with the guns. That would be a problem.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 25 points 1 day ago

Yeah, there's a problem in the assumption that this is a decision for Trump to make and that everyone under the executive just needs to wait for a decision from above about whether court orders should be obeyed. When the courts say an act was illegal, the default stance for a public employee should be to implement that instruction.

Friday at noon Gavin Newsome is their commander, whether or not Trump agrees. If they're going to refuse that, that's the guard itself deciding to act illegally, not a choice by Trump that they just have to follow.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Agreed. It doesn't matter if trump likes the decision or not. If the National Guard commanders (and soldiers) follow the governors orders, trump is out of the equation (on this one...for now).

[–] Sc00ter@lemm.ee -1 points 1 day ago

Thats not how overunders work...

Over/unders need to have a numeric value, not a yes/no.

An over/under could be, "how quickly until trump disrespects this?" Or even better, state the line yourself. "Over/under 1 hour until trump appeals this?" Then people can actually pick under or over.