this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
360 points (98.4% liked)

politics

24306 readers
2801 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump said on Friday that farmers may be able to keep employing undocumented migrant workers without fearing enforcement raids under a system in which they would take "responsibility" for them.

Undocumented immigrants make up 4.6% of the U.S. workforce— more than 7 million people. Many of them work in agriculture, hospitality and construction, The Guardian reports.

Shay Myers, who runs Parma, one of the country's largest onion farms, warned that "we will not feed our people without these workers," considering that the Department of Agriculture estimates that over 40% of industry workers are undocumented.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago
[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago

So he's thinking about a soft sell on "Slavery Lite" then. Do you guys remember the days when a president could do something like this and it would IMMEDIATELY mean the absolute end of their political career? I miss that. I miss that so much.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

President Donald Trump said on Friday that farmers may be able to keep employing undocumented migrant workers without fearing enforcement raids under a system in which they would take "responsibility" for them.

It was not immediately clear how the system would work, and is the latest of several changes of tune regarding the matter.

IE, Trump has concepts of a plan.

Not anywhere near as concrete as the headline suggests.

Trump suggested last week that migrants working in industries like farming would be exempted from enforcement raids given the disproportionate impact that enforcement operations could have in the economy and the industry.

After the statement, ICE officials reportedly told staff in an internal email to largely lay off raids and arrests in the agricultural, hotel and restaurant industries. However, the pause did not last long. By Sunday, Trump had publicly reversed his previously proposed policy entirely, ordering agents via a Truth Social post to deliver what he called the "single largest Mass Deportation Program in History"— focusing particularly on America's largest cities, almost all being run by Democrats.

In other words, Trump himself has mutually inconsistent, diametrically opposed 'policy' goals, and is too demented/senile, fundamentally stupid, and tempermental, to actually formulate a coherent 'policy'.

This is all contradictory nonsense, and Trump's subordinates are basically just interpreting whatever vague nonsense Trump is saying in whatever way they want.

It is the same as his tariff bullshit.

Tariffs are good because they'll bring in revenue and balance the defecit!

Oh wait, they're crashing the economy? Hah, idiot, that was a negotiating tactic, now we'll negotiate!

Oh wait, negotiations failed? Hah, idiot, that was a bluff, what will actually happen is tariffs will make domestic manufacturing boom!

Wait what? Domestic manufacturing relies on either final assembly of imported goods, or just rebadging/relabeling and reselling imported goods... or actually paying for and building new factories first?

Uh, uh, uh, uh.... Bomb Iran!

...

All Trump knows how to do is scam and grift people by saying what he thinks they want to hear, and also self-aggrandizing.

Now he is absurdly out of his depth, and is floundering and flipflopping like a fish out of water.

The reality is that federal agents of the regime will do whatever the fuck they want, justify it however the fuck they want, and threaten to arrest or shoot whoever the fuck they want.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

Oh... So... Slavery, then? But, you know, without calling slavery outright.

[–] Tilgare@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago

Ignoring all the other obvious issues... How would this even work if these gestapo fuckers are rounding people up at Home Depot and court houses and routine traffic stops? These farms will just continue to bleed legal and undocumented migrants, regardless of whether they're directly raiding a farm.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Lets see how long it will take some red neck farmers to abuse the system and threaten their workers with "work more or I will get you deported" kind of threats.

[–] manicdave@feddit.uk 8 points 12 hours ago

That's always been the system. That's how they keep the wages so low.

[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 21 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

That's been reported already. Already happened.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

well I guess that will now start happening to legal immigrants as well since being a legal immigrant does not stop ICE from kidnapping you apparently

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

Sort of always been that way. Most of our immigrant purges have been.

It's really hard to tell someone's legal status just from looking at them, but most people can identify a race on sight alone.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

That’s already been happening for a hundred years.

[–] bieren@lemmy.zip 32 points 1 day ago

Slavery. It’s called slavery.

[–] febra@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Heinous country. Imagine being such a horrible place that you mistreat the ones that feed you.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I'm all for shitting on my shit country, but mistreating farmers is pretty common globally

[–] febra@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

I'm talking about these "farmers" mistreating their workers, exploiting undocumented immigrants, and so on.

[–] molestme247@lemmy.world 230 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] BrazenSigilos@ttrpg.network 81 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Yeah, not surprised at the Orange Blunder finding a way to bring back slavery. Oh his cronies will think up a different name for it, but soon these poor people will be segregated and counted as ⅗ of a person for purposes of population counting when drawing up political districts.

At this rate we are going to end up with Civil War 2 Electric Boogaloo before Christmas...

Edit: Correction of fractions, the historical amount was ⅗, not ⅕.

[–] parody@lemmings.world 11 points 1 day ago

3/5 was a compromise… Orange will round down to the nearest whole number

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Art3sian@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That’s just slavery with extra steps.

[–] obvs@lemmy.world 97 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Ahh, yes.

I think the U.S. used to have a system where the farmers assumed responsibility for people who weren't citizens but worked for them.

What was that called again?

[–] hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 day ago

What was that called again?

sTaTeS riGhTs!

[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 87 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Oh, so like visa sponsorship? The thing that already exists?

[–] raltoid@lemmy.world 60 points 2 days ago

No, you don't understand. This will have the Trump name, so it's different.

-Idiots

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 day ago

It will be worse, because in the very vague details as this is being discussed, this will formally tie them to an employer, so they won't be able to seek employment that doesn't hire "illegals", and basically lets employers deport people.

A visa is a contract between the immigrant and the state, with the employer acting as a third party, not as an intermediary. This is indentured servitude, basically formalising the current system where these people are allowed in as long as they are only used to undercut local wages, but they can't seek their own happiness and freedom.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If the labor that is necessary for feeding people can't exist without undocumented workers, then perhaps the system itself is fundamentally broken if there is no easy path to citizenship.

You cannot have it both ways, Trump. Either it's easy to come here and get papered up and nobody gets deported (and he loses his ultimate scapegoat), or it's just as hard as it is now and we deport everyone working the fields and starve.

[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 10 points 1 day ago

He can have it both ways. He is just going to say the farmers are heros for "taking the risk" and "protecting us all" from the violent cohort that is required to get our food to table now. Immigrants can be the enemy even more than ever, his base gets to eat up a new form of cognitive dissonance like a brain tumor, all will be well this time next year for them.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

My official guess for the name of this new slavery program is the "Essential Guest Worker" bill/order.

[–] ragas@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

Why not "Substantial Labour Addition Verification Edict"?

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I've said it before but before I die I fully expect to see some sort of "Right to Labor" (or something) law where companies can press unemployed people into "employment" for prison wages.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

No, brand it the way he likes, call it "Trump Slaves".

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Has a single one of these ~~plantation~~ farm owners been arrested for employing the undocumented workers?

[–] Drdoom2027@kbin.earth 36 points 2 days ago

Nope. They hire these people then call ICE on them when it's payday. They got the fruits picked and didn't have to pay a dime.

[–] BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago

Yeah except the Visa program they use is tied to their employment. Big Ag has been holding people basically as indentured slaves, forcing them to live on the farm. Any disagreement, or refusal to perform as the owner wants and their status is void and they get sent back. The government has known for YEARS about this happening. Always turned a blind eye, and now they have removed any avenue to permanent legal status in the US from that very visa program. So, want to live, or flee from oppression to the US? Well, now they'll oppress you.

Source

Invidious: https://invidious.nerdvpn.de/watch?v=1COm0C73CKw Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1COm0C73CKw

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Farmers: "All hail King Donald! He solved the problem he himself caused! What a business GENIUS!"

Face Eating Leopards: "Munch! Chew! Nom!"

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're all just making shit up as they go along, aren't they?

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not exactly made up. Slavery is a real thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 17 points 1 day ago

TACO again. Faced with collapse of the food bowl which was obvious…..

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago
[–] match@pawb.social 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In the US? You're gonna get indentured servitude

[–] slingstone@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Slavery with extra steps...

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I would prefer the government to implement universal healthcare, and to make immigrants have it if they and their workplace are documented. Voila, we get rid of the REAL parasites: employers that pay less than minimum wage. It isn't the migrants fault that companies are crappy stewards of civilization.

H-2A Visa... Is literally that. This program wouldn't be "new".

load more comments
view more: next ›