this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
559 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24719 readers
2666 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 133 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This guy loses more than wins, so that makes him a loser.

[–] shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 81 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 67 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)
[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

*loser rapist felon con-man

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago (3 children)

And he's not even a good golfer.

[–] crazycraw@crazypeople.online 30 points 2 days ago

also he's fucking fat and stupid and I hate him.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I feel like the number of loser rapist felon conmen good dads is really small

Well, Trump talked about dating his daughter while she sat on his lap, so he's not gonna land in the overlap of that venn diagram anyway.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Well, he's famous for his foot-wedge.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

*stupid dumbshit goddamn motherfucker

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 12 points 1 day ago

I'd add fascist to this list, but I see you already included loser.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump loco - loses or chickens out

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 3 points 1 day ago

Trump Always Chickens Out Or Loses

Tacool

[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] einlander@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Suffering from success

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 63 points 1 day ago (4 children)

IANAL, but perhaps he should appeal under the claim that apparently all the court documents look as though they are written in Liberian. Hardly a fair trial.

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm appalled it's not on Duolingo yet!

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I didn't understand this reference.

[–] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump complimented the president of Liberia on the president's good English. Liberia is an English-speaking country

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 17 points 1 day ago

I'm fully convinced of the existence of parallel universe. I don't think I could go on knowing this is the definitive one.

Trump recently met with the president of Liberia, and complimented him on his good English speaking skills. English is the national language of Liberia.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What does Liberia have against Trump?

[–] MyNameIsIgglePiggle@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They don't like his language

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago

Oh! Was it the Liberian guy that Trump complimented on his good English when that's an English speaking country? Okay, I'm slow. Funny!

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 1 day ago

What do books have to do with anything??

[–] cheers_queers@lemmy.zip 50 points 2 days ago

Only time his name makes me smile is when he has been once again slapped down by a court of law. Gives me butterflies almost.

[–] selkiesidhe@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Surprised this crusty old twatwaffle doesn't just EO that he didn't do it. Why the fuck not at this point. There are no spines in Congress or scotus, they'll let him do it.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Executive orders can only instruct the Executive Branch to take some sort of action. While the Department of Justice is a part of the Executive Branch, it consists of the government's lawyers, not of the government's judges. The judicial branch is outside the purview of the Executive Branch, and so out of reach of a Trump EO.

Now, would he still try? Of course he would. But it would have the same legal weight as Michael Scott yelling "I DECLARE BANKRUPTCY!!"

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Eh, "executive order," "royal decree" -- same difference, at this point!

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I'm sure that he thinks so.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This isn't federal court. You can't EO around it, then, right?

[–] match@pawb.social 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He can do it, but it won't matter. EOs directed at something outside of the Executive Branch are basically just announcements.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They are still getting followed.

His shit about trans women in women’s sports got Lia Thomas’s records stripped from her, and I doubt any school is going to allow trans women to play anything in the future.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well, the Department of Education is a part of the Executive Branch, so the NCAA has a financial incentive to go along with Trump's EOs or lose funding.

I'm not saying that EOs are completely toothless, and I'm also not saying that he won't try. I'm just saying that they can't do absolutely anything; and specifically, they can't directly impact the Judiciary.

[–] runiq@feddit.org 16 points 2 days ago

"Time to quintuple down," said the dirtbag.

[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Let’s see what Alibaba product he’ll promote this time.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Tacky 'golden' rapist kit.

Balaclava with 'golden' thread around the holes.
Pair of 'real' faux leather gloves with your initials sewn on to the back in the same golden 😏😏 thread.
Chloroform bottle with a plastic gold coloured cap (alternatively just buy his shitty perfume, it's the same fucking thing)
1 weapon of choice: knife, bat, rope. Whichever you choose will be lightly wafted with some gold spray paint from a rattle can.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

That judge better be on a plane.