this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
295 points (98.0% liked)

News

23266 readers
3291 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stifle867@programming.dev 142 points 11 months ago (2 children)

This could have been prevented if there was a good toddler with a gun.

[–] squaresinger@feddit.de 57 points 11 months ago (3 children)

The toddlers need gun training. If every toddler had a gun, stuff like this wouldn't happen.

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 22 points 11 months ago

The solution is obviously to try toddlers as adults.

[–] 15liam20@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"Aim at the head, shoulders, not the toes, not the toes."

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Now remember kids, for a jam you put the magazine in, you take the magazine out... in out, in out, shake it all about.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 24 points 11 months ago

Or if we just had mental health programs for toddlers, we wouldn't have any issues with giving toddlers guns!

[–] the_q@lemmy.world 67 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Another responsible gun owner!

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

Sad thing is is that there are probably many responsible gun owners, but its the jackasses that get publicized and drawn into the public eye.

Though, that's how it should be. It just takes one reckless owner to ruin several people's lives. That's an incredibly low margin of error, and people should talk about it.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 41 points 11 months ago (18 children)

EVERYONE is a responsible gun owner until they aren’t.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There are, mostly in fact. For some rough math, there are 333,287,557 people in the US, about 50% of which own guns for a rough 166,643,778.5 gun owners. There are 60,000 yearly gun deaths including suicides, accidents, and intentional firearm homicides, for a total of 0.036004944523026% of gun owners likely to be irresponsible leading to death in any given year.

Couple notes, this doesn't include illegally owned guns/gun owners in the number (166,643,778.5) of gun owners, because we can't have that number by the nature of it. Most gun crime excluding suicide comes from them though, and so the 60,000 does include them. This also doesn't include people only injured or non injurious irresponsibility or negligent discharge, as often this goes unreported and so far as I can find isn't tracked well likely due to difficulty. That surely does happen as well, like the idiots filming themselves pointing it at the camera (and their own stupid hand). But these figures can at least paint a picture that somewhere around .036% of gun owners/yr are in the "irresponsible" camp, +/- .002% for margin of error.

I do agree, it should be talked about, we can learn from others' mistakes and lessen the frequency. We should also talk about it when people use them correctly in self defense, or training, IDPA, etc, because that is a lot more frequent and we can learn from good examples as well.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

Thanks for doing the homework - this was my general feeling too

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I think there's a big problem with responsible gun owners defending irresponsible gun owners. Like, there's a knee-jerk reaction when someone says guns are dangerous, even though you're supposed to always act as though they are dangerous.

[–] randombullet@feddit.de 52 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Needs to be changed to negligent discharge.

There are no accidents, just negligence.

Unless there is hardware failure, but that's a different story

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sorry... you think letting a toddler get ahold of your loaded gun isn't child endangerment?

[–] marx2k@lemmy.world 50 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Since when did USA become so anti freedom?
The toddler is clearly part of a militia, to prevent government oppression.
So he has every right to carry and fire whatever weapon in whichever place and direction he chooses.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 30 points 11 months ago (3 children)

that the 2-year-old boy took her Taurus 9mm firearm from her purse

Right, so the safety was off then, because there's no way that a two-year-old could release the safety on their own. The movies make it look like you just flick it with your finger but seriously that thing does not move without a reasonable around a force.

[–] theyoyomaster@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Many modern pistols don’t have safeties. Either way it shouldn’t have been loose in the purse and not in a holster.

[–] papertowels@lemmy.one 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not a super knowledgeable gun guy, but I think a fairly common example is for the "safety" to be part of the trigger. Safety's traditionally weren't meant to prevent someone from shooting the gun, they were there to prevent the gun from going off if you dropped it.

[–] theyoyomaster@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Any gun made in the last 50 years shouldn't go off if dropped. Physical safeties have always been about preventing human error. Trigger blades don't do anything to prevent this. I get a lot of flack in the gun community for this opinion but Glock doing away with physical safeties made the entire gun world more dangerous.

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

You can put a lot more force on any part of a gun if you're not concerned about proper grip and aiming and just use your whole hand.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago

Tbh not entirely, it could be possible, however unlikely. Honestly imo the bigger issue is off body carry in general is unsafe. Case in point your 2yo can grab it from the purse (and so can anyone else) but it's harder to grab and easier to retain it from a real, good holster, either CCW or active retention (like cop holsters with the button) for open carry (I also generally advise against OC, but whatever.)

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

ohio, the florida of the northeast.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ShunkW@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Of course it was in Waverly. That Walmart is always full of insane people who shouldn't have weapons, but you know they do. Used to pass through on my way to my hometown and refused to stop there after a few incidents with good old boys because I'm a gay dude who had very long hair back then.

[–] aeronmelon@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I understand, but you've described greater than half of all Walmarts.

[–] ShunkW@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I've never personally had issues in any other Walmart.

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 17 points 11 months ago (2 children)

This sounds about right for a Taurus owner.

[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Imagine being able to narrow it down that much when the rest of us go "That sounds right for an American" 🙄

[–] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not a gun person. Is that the Karen gun or something?

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 19 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Taurus, and this model in particular, is known as a cheap piece of shit probably purchased and carried by someone lacking intellect and sophistication... You know, the type who would have the thing sloshing around unattended in a purse, with no holster.

[–] JAC@reddthat.com 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I thought it was about the Ford Taurus. Lol

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

That boar population is outta control, huh?

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

It's a good thing that Toddler had a gun! Imagine if a gunman had decided to shoot up that Wal Mart! The Toddler could Protect itself!

[–] Flyswat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 months ago

She gave him the wrong pacifier

[–] GreenMario@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] plant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago

almost, dude

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

How does that shit even happen?

load more comments
view more: next ›