this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
263 points (96.8% liked)

politics

24827 readers
2376 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump has grown weary of defending Attorney General Pam Bondi's handling of the Justice Department's Jeffery Epstein files and wants her to take responsibility for cleaning up the mess, according to four people familiar with White House deliberations.

"One thing that's been clear is his feelings about it," one White House official told NBC News. "This now resides within the DOJ."

The administration's refusal to disclose the full contents of the government's investigation into Epstein, who killed himself in jail while awaiting trial on charges of sex-trafficking minors in 2019, has caused a deep rift between Trump and significant elements of his MAGA base.

top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nthavoc@lemmy.today 1 points 5 minutes ago

Fired by tweet and replaced by a random "acting" attorney general from some grocery store chain in 3...2...1

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

"The buck stops with literally anyone else" - Taco

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 28 points 9 hours ago

"I don't like that she's doing what I told her to do."

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 18 points 11 hours ago

Then he shouldn’t have picked her for that job.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 25 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Epstein, who killed himself in jail

Uh huh.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

And the video was accidentally doctored that same week

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 11 minutes ago

While the guards both had amnesia.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 20 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

To be fair she’s in a completely impossible position lol

[–] emmanuel_car@fedia.io 24 points 8 hours ago

And I feel absolutely no sympathy for her.

[–] EightLeggedFreak@lemmy.world 43 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

The administration's refusal to disclose the full contents of the government's investigation into Epstein, who killed himself in jail while awaiting trial on charges of sex-trafficking minors in 2019, has caused a deep rift between Trump and significant elements of his MAGA base.

Epstein didn't kill himself.

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago

Should have said allegedly

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

Epstein never dies.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 144 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

More accurate title:

Trump mad that Pam Bondi is failing to make Trump's involvement with Epstein go away like ordered

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 18 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I think even more accurate is "Trump tries to shift attention to Pam Bondi to avoid association with Epstein."

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago

"Trump reaches his 'start throwing everyone else under the bus' stage of dealing with bad publicity he brought on himself."

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Trump sides with MAGA from ~3 days ago, agrees Bondi should take his fall for him.

[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 23 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Trump overheard telling Eric: "This is like losing your uncle Epstein all over again."

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 2 points 11 hours ago

Tell me its real!

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 75 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

I don’t think it’s her job to take the heat for hiding the fact that he raped kids.

[–] dickalan@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago

Dude, that is literally her fucking job

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 6 points 13 hours ago

No, she doesn’t think that, but he does,

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 40 points 22 hours ago

That’s literally her job.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 34 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

You know who never had to "take responsibility for cleaning up the public relations mess" created by their crime boss raping little kids? The press secretary for every other President in US history!

[–] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 33 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

She's not his press secretary. It's not your fault for thinking that though, given how much fucking time she spends in front of cameras defending trump. But that just helps you point even more. Why is half of this cabinet in the news dealing with scandals 24/7?

For the life of me, I can't remember any cabinet member from this time last year except AG Garland and DOT secretary Buttigieg off the top of my head. I just looked it up and thought "oh yeah" when I saw Blinken and Yellen. I recognized Austin's picture, but never would've been able to guess his name. I recognized nobody else.

Holy fuck, I miss having rational people in control. I was able to just deal with my own shit without worrying about total collapse. Fuck Biden and Harris for not taking the Israel concerns seriously enough, and fuck the people who withheld their vote over that to pave the way for what we have now. The options now seem to be basically either 1941 Germany or 476 Rome.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 16 points 18 hours ago

The options now seem to be basically either 1941 Germany or 476 Rome.

Considering Secretary Brain Worms, 1958 China and 1975 Cambodia seem increasingly on the table, too.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 10 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Cheer up, Charlie. We can still get lucky and only get 1346 London. Again.

[–] jaennaet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 7 hours ago

We can still get lucky and only get 1346 London

🤞

There's a good chance that the next influenza pandemic will be kicked off in the US. Get ready for the American Flu!

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Maybe we'll get real lucky and land on 1790s France. Probably not, but we can always dream.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago

I'm personally hoping for 1991 Yugoslavia.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 hours ago

We might land on 1790s bizzaro-France, where we motivate them to instill to a unilateral tyrannical leader.

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 34 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I wonder if she has enough conscience and self-respect left to just dump the whole dirty mess out to the public.

Yeah, probably not. It’s fun to imagine, though.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 16 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

No she was involved with the Epstein shit back in Florida decades ago. She's been involved in covering this shit up well before it got to this point.

[–] Doom@ttrpg.network 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 19 points 16 hours ago

She was Florida AG from 2011 to 2019. At any point in there she could have prosecuted Epstein separately from the deal Alex Acosta made in 2008. Plenty of new information was available after that and ignored by the State of Florida under her watch.

https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/pam-bondi-epstein-files-florida-ag-b2792249.html

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 13 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

She is smart enough, probably, to know he will take her down with him. Either MAGA and the news get distracted with something else, she releases more documents with careful redactions of Trump and other prominent rightwingers, or she gets fired and replaced with someone willing to.

[–] ganksy@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The thing is, it's probably the shiny, dangling carrot of her in a more powerful position that motivates her more than the stick

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

What's higher than AG for a lawyer?

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 2 points 7 hours ago

A seat in the Supreme Court gets you decades of bribes

[–] ganksy@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I think it's not uncommon that politicians get their law degree and go on to various high positions in government that may not be relevant to those degrees. In this administration, the only thing that matters is loyalty so sky is the limit for her.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

In this administration, the only thing that matters is loyalty so sky is the limit for her

1000x this. Lots of his "administration" are total clowns with zero relevant credentials, like Bobby Brainworm.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 6 points 17 hours ago

A Supreme Court seat.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 13 points 21 hours ago

It was his handling. He's in charge now. He is responsible for every success and failure of his administration. Period.

[–] nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

"Good czar, bad boyars"