this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
527 points (99.4% liked)

196

4532 readers
2007 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 86 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Particle man, particle man. Clocking your ass like only wifi waves can.

[–] powdermilkman@piefed.ca 48 points 1 month ago (1 children)

is it illegal? it's not important. particle man.

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fucking prophetic. FYI it's impossible to feel depressed while listening to Birdhouse in your Soul.

[–] powdermilkman@piefed.ca 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Big TMBG fan here, a friend of a friend runs a pretty cool TMBG blog if you're interested https://www.kissmesonofblog.com/

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Well I'll be damned. The internet is not dead. Now we just need like an indexing service that helps us search and find all these amazing sites.

[–] jackr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago

It is not perfect by any means, but I have found that https://search.marginalia.nu/ is quite good at finding real people. there are also other useful things for this purpose on marginalia, such as the website explorer and a utility for finding websites similar to the one you put in..

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

At the least, add it to the Wayback Machine / Internet Archive and then throw them a dollar or a hundred, whatever you can. Not only do we need (new) indexing that isn't AI, but we need to make sure the best parts of the Internet don't disappear

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 84 points 1 month ago (2 children)

i didn't know I was considered schizophrenic for being aware of how technology is a bus for surveillance

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Non techie people are simply still below the "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." point, so that explains why imo. To them you are someone complaining about evil wizard conspiracies.

[–] breecher@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What are you on about? This is techies not getting that the tech they are researching is dystopian and dangerous.

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

The problem with paranoid-crazies is that sometimes there's truth and sometimes its wild.

With how wild the world is its impossible to tell what's what.

[–] superb@lemmy.blahaj.zone 56 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I’ve been seeing research on this for a few years now, crazy it’s come this far. You can track the movement of people in a home pretty accurately using WiFi like a radar

[–] theinternetftw@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Yep. It's also possible to fingerprint people's body signatures and reconstruct poses.

9 Years ago | 3 Years ago

mfs made that forbidden tech from The Dark Knight real 😭

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Add this to recreating sound from video of vibrations from objects like plants and potato chip bags

https://news.mit.edu/2014/algorithm-recovers-speech-from-vibrations-0804

[–] lime@feddit.nu 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i proof-read a dissertation on that very subject 10 years ago. it was using Bluetooth Low-Energy but the principle was the same. works through walls as well.

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Bluetooth is often used when tracking movement and wait times through queue lines in airports.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

how much of this is because they got phones in they pockets

[–] superb@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago

Not at all in this case since it works by watching how the signals bounce around in a space. I believe any large object could be tracked by this. You could then use the phone in their pocket to identify the large object

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 month ago (4 children)

This is yet another reason to own (or better yet, build your own) router.

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You have to go further.

If you don't fab your chips yourself, you are letting the authoritarian regimes in.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago (3 children)

There’s making a good effort, and there’s perfect acting as the enemy of good.

If you repurpose an old thin client, install an old enterprise NIC, and slap pfSense or opnSense on it, it’s gonna be a damn sight better in terms of corporate infiltration and co-opting of your infrastructure that whatever Comcast rents to you. That’s all I’m saying, and that’s how I run mine.

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nah, gotta grow and dope your own silicon to be sure

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you're not fusing the silicon from pure hydrogen yourself, is it even worth it?

[–] seraphine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago

nahh guys youre still corporate-brainwashed sheep. try assembling the silicon atom by atom yourself and only then you will be free

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Patches@ttrpg.network 19 points 1 month ago

To build a secure router from scratch, you must first invent the universe.

  • Carl Sagan
[–] dsilverz@calckey.world 11 points 1 month ago (7 children)

@gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works @nebula42@lemmy.zip If a neighbor has this thing, it doesn't matter if your router is yours, because theirs will still "infiltrate" (and see as well, as I'll say below) your house as microwave-length (both the 2.4GHz and the 5GHz) electromagnetic waves can and will trespass the walls separating the two...

...except if all your house structure, including walls and the floor and the roof, are layered with a metallic plate and/or a metallic mesh spaced exactly 12cm/x (the wavelength and its harmonics, such as 6cm (4.8GHz), 3cm(9.6GHz), etc) apart, but then it must not be electrically grounded, which then requires the plate/mesh to be something internally "glued" or bolted (with bolts made of non-conductive material) to the wall tiles and floor tiles rather than something buried inside concrete walls. Or, to summarize in two words, Faraday cage.

Why? Because the main problem with this technology is that it's not restricted to wall boundaries. In fact, it's used for some applications (military, police, etc., possibly even Google Streetview did this because they use wardriving to "improve geolocation services") to literally "see through the walls".

Or, to make this more ominous and menacing, "you can be seen in the dark"... And I mean this phrase in a literal sense, because the Wi-Fi transmitter acts like a lamp so a specialized array of Wi-Fi receivers can "see"...

So, actually, even your own router will end up being an involuntary lamp to your house for an external "Wi-Fi eye" (the aforementioned array of Wi-Fi receivers), except if you use other frequencies allowed for ISM (Industrial, Scientific and Medical radio ranges) such as 433MHz.

The solution is simpler yet still involving some complexities (such as math behind electromagnetic wavelength, harmonics, electrical conductivity, etc): Faraday cage all inside the house. Having no neighbors is also an interesting mitigation factor (although increasingly difficult as people are used to gather in neighborhoods, as well as the ongoing verticalization of cities).

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

As long as we're carrying cellphones with us at all times, none of this is particularly damning in comparison.

Signal attenuation is crap compared to directional homing in on the transmitter in your pocket.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 1 month ago

This is why you run your AP's with openwrt.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, I'm glad they have figured out how to block WiFi signals from leaving your house and detecting your neighbours if you live in an apartment or terrace........

This is another Pandora's box moment I think. I kinda was enjoying walls still being somewhat effective privacy guards

[–] buffing_lecturer@leminal.space 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I think there is actually some anti-wifi paint. Though I am pretty sure it would only work well if you also paint the floor and ceiling.

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

You’re thinking to small. You must get several extremely powerful emitters and simply jam up the wavelengths that wifi operates at for the entire block. Ideally you have them emit in a way that anyone trying to track your movement and position with it instead just get a dancing 3d model of some character.

Concealment isn’t enough, you must asset electromagnetic dominance over your neighborhood.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

just use wire mesh wallpaper

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Okay, well I needed an excuse to hire an electrician and rewire sound outlets, but if they can install Ethernet ports and I don’t have to deal with anything like this shit I’ll be happier.

[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's not just your wifi, it's any wifi. Best start building a Faraday cage.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also, you can prevent your wifi from being used this way against you, get an open-source router

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jayjader@jlai.lu 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Recent research paper that I assume this is based off of: https://arxiv.org/html/2507.12869v1

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

By leveraging non-visual biometric features embedded in Wi-Fi CSI, this study offers a privacy-preserving and robust approach for Wi-Fi-based Re-ID, and it lays the foundation for future work in wireless biometric sensing.

how the fuck would this make it privacy preserving?? who are these lieing to, themselves, policymakers, or the general public?

[–] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

D all of the above. Probably comes from a narrow conceptualization of privacy that ends at "do you know what my privates look like", maybe stretching to "can you listen to me orgasm". It wasn't specifically the intent of the piece, but I remember when Last Week Tonight did a bit about data collection exposed by Snowden and demonstrated that Joe Public doesn't conceptualize the loss of privacy well until it is placed in the context of "private parts"/peeping tom behavior, at least in the US context

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Straight evil.

And even dumber to boot!

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago

Cool, now we can find all the invisible people living in our homes! /s

[–] enbiousenvy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is why I never interested with technological advancement and innovations in the past decade. Sure a lot of it are technically cool, I maybe even want to play around or even tinker (if accessible) with some of them.

But not for them to constantly make me consume all of those things or for them to use it malicously to people.

load more comments
view more: next ›