this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2025
785 points (97.9% liked)

196

4542 readers
1908 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 153 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (13 children)

Has there been evidence he's Christian and conservative/republican? I know his family is, but that's not really enough.

I'm not attacking the point being made, I just haven't seen any evidence, and would certainly like to.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 103 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Not Christian, Mormon which is actually quite the distinction here.

And just because he was raised Mormon does not mean he still follows the faith of his parents.

Evidence he was strictly conservative is slim. There is good commentary about this over on (slight retch) reddit in /r/exmormon including the violent aspects of Mormon scripture and how many Mormons hate both Democrats and Republicans.

[–] stray@pawb.social 25 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Mormons are Christians though. Just because some other Christians don't want them in their club doesn't make their flavor of Jesus worship less valid.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

That's like saying "Christians are actually Jewish though. Just because some other Jews don't want them in their club doesn't make their flavor of worship less valid."

They literally have their own holy books that don't exist for other flavors of Christianity, just as Christianity has their own holy books that don't exist for Judaism.

[–] renzhexiangjiao@piefed.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

Christians believe that Jesus is the son of God and that he died on the cross and was resurrected three days later. Do Mormons not believe this?

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So do Muslims. Jesus is to the Quran and the Book of Mormon what Moses is to the New Testament. A recognized prophet, but not the prophet because god apparently felt the need to send a new one down to earth to clarify a few things.

I don't personally give a shit as I'm not even remotely religious, but the only reason Mormons pretend to be a Christian sect is because it's politically convenient to them as a US religious minority to "blend in" better. The more you learn about their beliefs, the more you realize they might be further apart from Christianity than Christianity is from Judaism.

[–] stray@pawb.social 9 points 2 weeks ago

No, Muslims believe that Jesus was a human prophet who was deified by people who strayed from his true teachings. Jesus was not the son of God, and there is no holy trinity. He didn't die on the cross for our sins because God took him up into heaven. Mormons, however, do believe in these key aspects relating to the divine nature of Jesus and his role as savior in their religion.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Mormons also believe that what most Christians concieve of as God, is actually more of just the local demigod of this Solar System, not the entire universe, who comes from a line of other demigods before him, not being the uh, uncreated creator that existed prior to the universe itself, and has domain over all of it.

Reminds me of Dragon Ball Z.

......

Further, should you be a good and proper enough Mormon, you get to go to the super duper highest level of the top 1/3rd of Mormon afterlife outcomes, whereby you too can become a local demigod of your own solar system!

... If you are a man.

You have to be a married man to pull this off, get the secret Temple names with the underwear and all that, donate a LOT to the Church... but wifey... nah she does not get a shot at becoming a demigod, she's just a demigod's wife.

Basically no other Christians believe that any man can become godlike.

.......

Mormons also don't believe in the Trinity.

Their idea of Jesus and God and the Holy Spirit is more or less that they are all seperate and distinct entities, not triune paradox of simultaneous distinction and indistinction.

........

Beyond the more ... historical fan fiction type additions to the existing lore, fucking with those three core tenets is sufficient for most American Christians to deem Mormons as sacreligious heretics.

......

To try and wrap this around:

Just because all Dragon Ball Z fans believe Goku 'killed' Frieza on Namek...

Does not mean they all consider Dragonball GT to be canon.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I appreciate that we do all of this research and investigation when folks are white. /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Also straight? How tf you know that?

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 57 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Well since there was an engraved bullet that said "if you read this you're gay LMAO" it means he had to have read it at some point while engraving it ergo he is gay. /s

[–] GongFuFlashSteep@slrpnk.net 56 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is baseless speculation as no one can be sure if he said "no homo" while making the engraving.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

Its not enough to just say it while engraving it. Any time following its creation if he had happened to see it without saying "no homo" first, the State would be forced to recognize him as gay. I don't make the rules here. This isn't just baseless speculation, there are statistics that back this up:

s

source

Prior generations that didn't have this phrasing as part of their subculture were naturally protected as evidenced by the low representation in the Silent Generation as well as Boomers. However with GenX this is where it entered the mainstream and the numbers bear this out. Young millennials and certainly GenZ simply weren't prepared and as such have been hit the hardest as the data shows. /s

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

AP News reported he was not a republican but racialized by Kirk's hate speech. Everything else seems spot on.

The christian stuff is debatable since it hasn't been pointed out yet. Just bc your family is, doesn't mean you are. However, it is safe to say he has been taught those values

https://apnews.com/article/charlie-kirk-shooting-tyler-robinson-suspect-d893cc16fb0937d507283c710c551ef0

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

For that matter, does it really matter what group he was a part of? Theres a tendency to try to declare anyone that has done anything objectionable as being part of a group one doesnt like, or at the very least not part of one's ingroup, but that's a bit pointless.

If a group it large enough its more or less statistically certain that it will contain whatever sort of horrible people you can think of, and this includes things like the group of people with roughly the same political alignment as you. Whatever you support or believe in, if it isnt incredibly niche and rare, there are going to be murders, rapists, bigots, and whoever else is terrible out there who agree with you.

It doesnt make sense to fret over that, or to take the existence of one such guy as an argument that a position must be wrong somehow. If a position inherently requires such things, like the position of someone advocating genocide, or if it inherently increases the risks that excess deaths will happen, like with an anti-vaxxer, one can point those things out and say that the position leads to harmful societal outcomes. But the ideology of an individual murderer is almost irrelevant to if the rest of the holders of that position have a point or not.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 36 points 2 weeks ago

Morally and logically, it doesn't matter what boxes the shooter checks. In terms of how it will be used in politics, it matters a great deal. It shouldn't, but it does.

[–] Sh00Fly@piefed.social 8 points 2 weeks ago

This is all I could find that hasn’t been retracted (yet):

The quiet street where Robinson lived with his parents is now the subject of intense scrutiny. Officers from the Washington City Police Department kept media and neighbors on the other side of the street.

Neighbors were largely tight-lipped about the family, but many of those who spoke with USA TODAY focused on the family’s faith – they are members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, whose members are known as Mormons.

And that faith helped lead to Robinson’s capture.

Source: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2025/09/12/what-we-know-charlie-kirk-shooting-suspect/86091474007/

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] sirico@feddit.uk 92 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Luckily, your President and members of Congress didn't just knee-jerk feelings and assumptions and stuck to facts. It'd be really embarrassing if they just went on national TV and assumed and spread mis-information.

[–] ganksy@lemmy.world 32 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm sure all the networks will issue a complete apology in legalese after a long infomercial at 3am on Tuesday morning. Damage done. Nothing corrected. Right wingers will continue to believe he was trans, black antifa. Just like the would be trump assassin.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ValarieLenin@midwest.social 62 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sad case of white on white violence.

[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 12 points 2 weeks ago

Many such cases.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 54 points 2 weeks ago

i know it gets forgotten but the shooter in evergreen was also a white cis male radicalised conservative with white supremacist and anti semitic views who glorified columbine.

[–] GoddessGundy@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago

I don't know who did it. But every patron yesterday at my bar who was spouting off or saying enough is enough, or what is this world coming to, yada yada yada were all real quiet about the whole thing today.

It was a blessed night. Busy. My body is screaming at me. But there was no political talk. Everyone was behaving themselves and besides the one dude I had to kick out yesterday showing up again, it was all around much better.

It almost hurts restraining myself from saying "where's all that shit talking now? Enough is still enough, right!? RIGHT?"

But when I'm working, I'm working. Maybe one day I'll get to be the drunk idiot.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Correction: Registered with no political party, but everything else seems correct.

Edit: https://www.politifact.com/article/2025/sep/12/Tyler-Robinson-Charlie-Kirk-suspect-shooting-facts/

The "Republican" was a different, older, person.

[–] AltheaHunter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Charlie Kirk's alleged killer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Let's gloat about this.

The "unhinged radicals" this whole time have been the Republicans scaring people with totally unfounded claims of a trans uprising, calling to use the government to silence the left, getting people fired for posting that Kirk kinda had it coming, fighting each other at vigils, chanting "white men fight back".

And this whole time we kinda knew it wasn't the left. That this moronic clown wasn't worth wasting perfectly good bullets on. We just waited for everyone to find out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How are they spinning this now? Will they say that “the shooter didn’t disagree with Kirk’s ideology, therefore this was not ‘politically motivated violence’, and also this must mean nothing is wrong with Kirk’s ~~hate~~ speech.” Then they dismiss the kid as being mentally ill, and everyone move along, nothing more to see here.

Or maybe he was secretly trans Muslim antifa, and that they are hiding amongst them in their own ranks. That would be kind of funny. Though it would end up getting more dangerous.

Or they have a better spin?

[–] Event_Horizon@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

One I've seen posted a bunch is, this guy was a wholesome religious conservative who was radicalised and indoctrinated when he went to uni...which he dropped out of after one semester

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

The woke was just too much, he crashed out like Icarus in the ocean!

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I'm pretty sure he has no great love for fascists.

The checklist is cute but it's wrong.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

The fascist thing on the bullets is a direct reference to Helldivers 2 which is a canonically Starship Troopers (the movie) style universe where the fascists who run Super Earth refer to themselves as a democracy while calling their enemies fascist.

This one could go either way, honestly.

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 weeks ago

Helldivers 2 is an anti-fascist game, but because you play as the baddies, not everyone has the media literacy to understand that.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] forrgott@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

You seem to have a rather binary world view. The world is not black and white; anybody who fails to move past such a juvenile perspective is part of the problem.

In other words, your over simplification is not cute, and is also wrong.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 weeks ago

We should all be gun fans too, on this blessed day

[–] phuntis@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

we don't know it's him stop doing the cops work for them spinning the narrative remember luigi mangione they were obviously framed cause they just needed to shut things up and yet everyone went along with it just cause he's hot and it's funny you think they wouldn't do it again don't treat this person as definitely the killer the cops say they are that doesn't mean they are

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›