this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
639 points (94.8% liked)

politics

25850 readers
3935 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

She’s embarked on a nationwide tour with Vermont’s Independent Senator Bernie Sanders, held town halls outside of her district in upstate New York, and raised $15 million

Democratic Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a progressive who has cemented her popularity with young voters, is reportedly considering running for president or the Senate in 2028.

Ocasio-Cortez, 35, made a splash when she was elected to represent New York’s 14th congressional district, located in the Bronx and Queens, in 2019. Now, the Democrat is reportedly considering taking the next step in her political career as the party searches for its next generation of leaders, Axios reported Friday.

Members of Ocasio-Cortez’s team have recently been positioning the progressive lawmaker, known as AOC, to either run for president or run for a Senate seat.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Octavio@lemmy.world 44 points 6 days ago (1 children)

“Plotting” is an infuriating word choice.

I’d vote for her. I’m not interested in entertaining any arguments about electability. The least electable person in the universe has won the presidency twice. If enough people vote for her she is electable.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

AOC concocts DEVIOUS scheme to repossess burger from McDonalds using PRIVATE bank account funding

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 3 points 5 days ago

AOC buy lunch at McDonalds.

AOC funds animal murder with her own monies.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 23 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

" is reportedly considering running for president or the Senate in 2028."

Stupid clickbait title.

[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 32 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] Zink@programming.dev 12 points 6 days ago

I'm picturing that family guy skin shade card, but the top says "decisive executive leadership" while the bottom says "plotting/conspiring."

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yes, such dastardly plans.

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Conspicuous in their, uh, inconspicuity

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Title is a lie. It says right in the body "president or Senate". Downvote and report.

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Also: "plotting"? What the fuck is this? Has running for president suddenly become illegal??

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

it's subconscious conservatism sneaking into the headline.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

Good! I hope she comes with some fire, sound policy ideas, and a tight campaign

[–] grooveygroovester@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think both oligarchs and corporatists alike will fight far too hard to take her down. The US would need a far more fair and democratic procedure to elect someone that would change the paradigm like AOC--especially since Citizens United.

[–] TheMinister@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

But why is there such this defeatist attitude any time someone remotely not terrible tries to do something? It’s like we’re doing the fascists work for them with talk like this. I get that fuckery happens any time someone kinda different or kinda maybe good (for a politician) steps up, but that can be overcome with more support. When the margins are thin, it’s easy for them to cheat. When they aren’t, it’s fucking not. So let’s stop making the margins tighter with this kind of talk

[–] nuggie_ss@lemmings.world 2 points 6 days ago

They want to be proven right when things go poorly, increasing the odds of that happening in the process.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dumples@midwest.social 16 points 6 days ago

I was very disappointed no Tim Walz in that list of other potential candidates. He was the best part of the Harris / Walz ticket

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yes please if only for her age. I want old people out of power and I mean that across the entire spectrum including Bernie sanders. He would be great in her cabinet but we need young people FFS

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Why? I'm all for AOC and it has nothing to do with her age. I don't see anything magical about someone's age when it comes to setting policy. I like AOC, but I also like wisdom and experience.

[–] offspec@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Geriatrics running the country don't have to worry about personally experiencing any of the negative long term consequences of their actions.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Maybe, but if they are progressive and/or have basic empathy and understanding, they understand the morality of planting a seed you may never see become a tree.

Young demons that have been radicalized by The Algorithm and the GOP are not going to GAF if they have the wrong ethics, no matter what age they are.

[–] oascany@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

But we're repeatedly seeing most geriatric politicians not have basic empathy, especially on one side.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Perspective and optics. The millennials were robbed of their chance on the world stage by the boomers. The boomers perspective doesn't work for what the world is now. People need to see a representation of themselves up there. A representative of the people for the people by the people yada yada yada

[–] Azal@pawb.social 3 points 6 days ago

The millennials were robbed of their chance on the world stage by the boomers.

Gen X over there like "What the fuck!?!" (I'm a millennial, I get the plight.)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

She is one of only two people I would be excited to vote for.

The other person is Jon Stewart.

I want Dolly Parton.

[–] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 days ago

Whatever, I’ll wait for the official announcement. Love AOC but not getting my hopes up. Wait till there’s actual news.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

Here's to hoping AOC is another Mamdani during the primaries.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

IF there is something to run in 2028.

[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I feel like shit typing this but I'm afraid America will not vote for a woman, each time it's resulted in disaster.

Sure I'll vote for her, but frankly we need a sure thing, we got a lot of mess to fix, starting with shoring up our constitution against bad faith actors and arresting and prosecuting fascist criminals.

Disbanding the heritage foundation, impeach and remove supreme court justices, reverse citizens United, and remove voting rights of all those pardoned for J6.

Fox news should be made an example of with laws preventing their type of misinformation and propaganda and they should be destroyed.

Scientific fact will be the rule and the standard. Education and our core of government will be free from all religion. Any church or religious organizations in politics will be taxed and disqualified from government.

So many people need to face consequences and I hope you all have a list and are keeping score.

The gloves are fucking off.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nuggie_ss@lemmings.world 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

I'd vote for her in a heartbeat.

Probably one of the few candidates that have a chance with the democrats that would get me out to the polls.

If they nominate someone like kamala harris or joe biden again, it's all over.

This is of course assuming it's not all over already because they ran spineless crooks who don't represent the working class.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (14 children)

If they nominate someone like kamala harris or joe biden again, it's all over.

If they nominate someone like that, you should still go vote for that person and continue to fight for change, because the alternate is still far worse. The reality with US politics is that unless one of (or both) the two major parties implodes, the president will be affiliated with one of them. If one of the parties does break apart, it will guarantee a win for the other party.

If there is one thing the right does very well, it's to whip it's voters in line when election time comes. They may bitch and moan, but they'll vote for the (R) regardless.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] berno@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (4 children)

She won't win a run for POTUS. Try Senate first.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I’ll be voting for her if she is the clear path to overcome tyranny. If not, I’ll be voting for whoever that person is.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] carlossurf@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago

I hope she wins

load more comments
view more: next ›