this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
833 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

59188 readers
3238 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

'Your Turn': United Auto Workers Launches Campaign to Unionize Tesla::After the UAW won contracts with the Big Three, it's seeking to unionize 150,000 workers across a dozen companies including Tesla.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] specseaweed@lemmy.world 140 points 11 months ago (6 children)

This is a very exciting time. I've been a union guy for 25 years and I will go to my grave not understanding the fierce resistance to unions by my X gen and the boomers. When they would say unions were bad, I'd say let's make ours amazing and... they just refused.

I never thought I would see the resurgence of American labor unions. This is an absolute joy to see.

[–] RedditReject@lemmy.world 54 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Depending on where you lived you were plied with anti-union rhetoric. I remember back in the '80s and working at a department store and they had us watch "training" videos about how we were a big family and how unions broke up that family and made us adversaries. I thought it was a bunch of bull, but I'm sure there were plenty of folks that bought into it.

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 23 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I think the most common explanation for anti union sentiment is this:

Most of the time, our justifications for doing anything are post-hoc: we decide based on gut reasoning, then invent a justification after we've already made up our minds in order to convince ourselves that we're creatures of logic.

When companies show those videos, it does two things: it intimidates, and it provides ready-made arguments for post-hoc justification.

They intimidate workers from organizing, but no one's ego can accept that. If someone says "let's unionize", most people think (subconsciously) 'Fuck!!! That's scary! We're not strong enough, and I'm gonna get totally beaten down if I stick my neck out!!'

And then their brain does it's thing and translates that into justifications, and when it needs words to form justifications, it draws then from the handy dandy premade justifications they were given during their intimation session. It's like, 'You're a bug, and if you fight us we'll step on you! Now here's a balm to soothe this massive wound to your pride. You're welcome. Now get back to work.'

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 12 points 11 months ago

Most of the time, our justifications for doing anything are post-hoc: we decide based on gut reasoning, then invent a justification after we’ve already made up our minds in order to convince ourselves that we’re creatures of logic.

Woah, are you telling me that people are not rational thinking creatures instead act purely on emotion. Cause I fully support that statement.

We have stop using the "reasonable, rational thinking" person as a standard. If people were truly that, there would be a lot less people in debt, more people taking care of their health before problems arose, and less bullshit overall.

[–] RedditReject@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

True. I remember thinking it was a load of crap, but it certainly got the message across that I'd be alone and out of a job if I tried to form a union.

And I also remember lessons in class where the textbook weren't l went into great detail about the corruption and mob ties of some unions, but very little about anything positive. There has definitely been an effort on the part of powerful folks to denigrate unions.

I remember reading The Jungle in college and getting a much different perspective of labor laws and union value

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago (4 children)

I've been in one union and it was a corrupt joke. That said, it was still the best unskilled job I've had by a large margin.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 11 months ago

McCarthyism and the decades of fear mongering and misinformation about communism and red scare tricked generations of Americans into thinking that the most patriotic thing you could do is die in your work boots for minimum wage.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I’ve been a union guy for 25 years and I will go to my grave not understanding the fierce resistance to unions by my X gen and the boomers.

Certain specific professions like IT, and its mercenary culture, don't fit well with the collective bargaining model. For many other professions/careers, a union can be a great tool for workers.

[–] honey_im_meat_grinding@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 11 months ago (10 children)

By "IT" do you mean tech? Because as a software engineer, I've seen turnover rates of 1-2 years for some of my favorite people I've worked with. If they actually had bargaining power, we know via studies done on unions and turnover rates that these engineers likely wouldn't dip as quickly and take institutional knowledge and their smart brains with them. Tech is so allergic to unions that it is literally inflicting damage onto itself - managers will tell you how expensive it is to hire new people because it takes months for them to catch up to your codebase, but the higher-up leadership is completely unwilling to listen to the data on how to actually retain people. They don't care if unions increase productivity or that the elasticity between productivity and salary is >1.0 as the unionisation rate grows (per studies done in Norway), because they don't want to lose their complete control over companies to collective bargaining.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] zzzz@lemm.ee 105 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 46 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

If they were up against a competent c-suite, this would be a failed effort from the start.

"cybertruck" is going to be a massive flop and and an embarassment and that is a perfect opportunity to "downsize" and have a semi-legit reason to fire anyone who doesn't spit with enough vigor at any calls for unionizing.

But acknowledging that glorified SUV is a flop is a step too far and it will be marketed as a success. Which gets rid of the cover.

I have no idea if UAW will succeed. But I think we are looking at a LOT of wrongful termination lawsuits (speaking of, did the twitter ones go anywhere?) and a massive poorly executed social media campaign on a single dying site.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 72 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Really love Shawn Fain's attitude of fighting with the corporations. More victories unions to start win, the easier it will be grow unions across of sorts of different industries.

We had Starbucks stores unionize, an Amazon warehouse unionize, and UAW winning major concessions.

[–] Adubya@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

I was a little bit worried about Shawn's strategy but he married his big pitch to the tried & true method of pressuring Ford first(more family owned & Detroit/Michigan connection to contend with). Proud to say he got a lot a lot of the strong labor points out there in the public. Glad we are seeing benefit from having more labor friendly president(we can always do better but glad we have something).

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Starbucks organizing still blows my mind. Young people working in restaurants have traditionally been the most difficult nut to crack, as they mostly see it as a short term thing. I guess times change and perception of economies with it!

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 11 points 11 months ago

People are getting tired of watching the rich get richer at the expense of everyone else. The fact that are people who the drive and skill to organize is something we should be celebrating.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Uglyhead@lemmy.world 46 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I can’t believe this. You will ruin the company and make it go away. Earth will remember this! Fuck off!

Muskrat— probably.

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 40 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Now if only they had the same support that unions do in Sweden

[–] force@lemmy.world 42 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (6 children)

Solodarity strikes are illegal in the US, the UK, Australia, and the Netherlands

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taft%E2%80%93Hartley_Act

Truman vetoed it and railed against it hard, but of course a corrupt and fiercly communist-paranoid congress overrode his veto.

[–] NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Never knew it was illegal in the UK. Didn't surprise me though to learn it was Margaret Thatcher who outlawed it again in the 80s.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Man fuck Taft. All my homies hate Taft.

[–] mycatiskai@lemmy.one 9 points 11 months ago

When you make your next union contract, get the expiry date the contract to be May Day. If everybody's contracts expire on the same day, it's easier to have a general strike day in the future.

Repealing that act should be one of the largest priorities of leftists in the United States. I wish people talked about it more.

[–] circasurvivor@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This might be a stupid question, but how does this law apply to non-union laborers looking to unionize, but aren't technically union yet?

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

In a right to work state, you'd get shit canned.

[–] Nommer@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Fuck em. How much illegal shit have megacorps gotten away with?

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 9 points 11 months ago

Everything they could, every moment of their existence.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Now if only they had the same support that unions do in Sweden

More people believe in unions than you may realize.

Don't just focus in on the shills/bots and what they're saying.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 39 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Fine, don't work here then. Fuck you.

Workers will kill Tesla and the whole world will see it. They'll judge

Musk in a year.

[–] ammonium@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 33 points 11 months ago

Oh this should be good.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 28 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Do you work at Tesla? Do you know more about this union drive? We’d love to hear from you. From a non-work device, you can contact Jules Roscoe at jules.roscoe@vice.com or on Signal at (415) 763-7705 for more security.

On Signal? Wow, I like that.

[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 18 points 11 months ago

Can't wait.

[–] Merlin404@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Go go you! Most people in Sweden expect those that drive Tesla want a union to! It should be the default on all bigger companies!

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"Son of slavery-driven diamond mine owner refuses union talks!", "how to eat dogshit", and much more, coming up after the break.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

I’m sure Elon Musk believes that dog shit is very nutritious and all of us at the bottom should be glad to have some

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Elon: more robots on order

[–] Liz@midwest.social 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They originally over-relied on automation in their factories, to Elon's own admission. There's just some tasks that humans will always be better at, until we see a fundamental change in robotics. And no, the current AI fad is not enough.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

For every job you replace with a robot, you generally have to hire 3 robot technicians, 1 per shift.

load more comments
view more: next ›