this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2025
198 points (98.5% liked)

politics

25827 readers
2183 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Many Democrats believe the White House is bluffing and insist Republicans will bear responsibility for a shutdown in the public eye because the GOP controls the government.

The Trump administration is expecting a government shutdown come Wednesday and there are no current plans to negotiate with Democratic leadership, according to a senior White House official.

“We’re going to extract maximum pain,” said the official, granted anonymity to discuss political strategy, adding that Democrats “will pay a huge price for this.”

The comments underscore the White House’s belief that Democrats will be blamed for a shutdown and its ripple effects, which could include mass layoffs across the federal government.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Let's be real. They likely will blink. The dems almost as a rule always have just enough turncoats on hand to ensure the Rs get everything they want and they themselves can't ever get anything done.

I expect nothing from them. But im open to being surprised.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

There is only one team. That's why it's always just enough

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 74 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The Democrats messaging, as always, has been abysmal on this. They should have been hitting the airwaves since the last vote preparing public for this to happen and - rightly - putting the responsibility on the GOP who owns both sides of congress and the presidency.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You know who owns the airwaves right

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of course, and yet SOME effort from the Dems would not go unnoticed. Politics today is so overwhelmingly based on vibes today and to not try to influence that is political malpractice.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 3 points 1 day ago

Not that the Democrats do good things often enough. But even when they do. Almost no one notices. It would absolutely go unnoticed.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

bruh, the GOP is 100% complicit in burning it all down, they win either way.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 60 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I say this as a government employee: shut it down. I don't want to be looking for a new job in Trump's economy, but we're long past the point where we can fight this authoritarianism without risking anything.

[–] DrPop@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Me too, as hard as a government shut down will be on my family it's necessary to preserve liberties.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If Democrats are smart they would be out there 24/7 telling the public that Trump has refused to work with the Democrats and remind them that Republicans have the votes to go out alone per Trump's orders.

And then let Republicans Mike pence themselves in a lose lose scenario and then go back on the air 24/7 doing the Scrubs I told you so dance.

Because right now, I literally have conservatives at work saying to everyone, including government people, about the pending Democrat shutdown.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You know those same people would be saying the same thing even if Democrats were shouting it from the rooftops that this is Trump's and the Republicans' fault. Odds are good that they wouldn't even see any information on it in their conservative bubbles.

I know but you know why they're saying this right? Because everyone in their bubble is out there saying this from the top, especailly from the top all the way down the the bottom of the barrel 24/Fucking 7/365.

Something that Democrats absolutely sucks balls at.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago

Oh no, Trump might do what he was going to do anyway.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

While the Democrats surely will be blamed (they have proven time and again that they are too incompetent to spin this correctly), falling flat will have worse consequences.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 43 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Don't we go though this every time? I could swear "we" settled on "the public blames the party that forced the shutdown" not the party in power.

[–] TheLunatickle@lemmy.zip 86 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Seems more like Americans always blame the democrats. It's like the country just expects the Republicans to be reprehensible pieces of morally bankrupt shit.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 67 points 1 day ago

It's like a dysfunctional family. People don't blame Dad for getting drunk, they blame Aunt Helen for pointing it out and getting him mad.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Pretty much spot on. The problem is that the only way to fight the republicans is with an effective Democratic party. Theres zero hope we could ever change the republican party, but theres some small hope of changing the democrats. Thus people focus on the democrats first.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Actually, the public blames whoever they want, per usual. People like when their party holds out for things they like, and people dislike when the other party holds out for things the don't like. People believe what they want, when they want, please see someone asking why Obama wasn't helping more during 9/11 (technically unrelated but my favorite example of people just willing to hate on a dem while just being so verifiably wrong): https://youtube.com/shorts/4v5Yoo9xLyw

Same as people not liking congress, but often liking THEIR congressperson. People don't care about the facts. Though I believe there's no real winning move for Dems at the moment. They have completely failed as a party and as an opposition party and if this is where they push back it will result in bad outcomes for their constituents, but they won't be able to justify those bad outcomes with any actual results.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Every day they delay is one more chance for Trump to stroke out and die before he can go full genocidal dictator. Considering his age and those health rumors I'd say that's a win.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Shut it down! It's not functioning correctly. Let's spin up a new one while the old one reboots.

[–] Weirdfish@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd be happy loading a backup copy from around 2012.

[–] blave@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

probly should load the one before 9-11 , things were already falling apart in 2012

[–] zammy95@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You want load beforehand so we have to have a second 9/11? You monster

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

If we stopped W from stealing the election, 9/11 would never have happened.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

9/11 two, the elevening

nah, let’s do 1999, the matrix was peak humanity.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago

You jest, but this is likely exactly what he's doing. Just not in that way.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Trump wants to shut down the government for good and install a dictatorship

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 21 points 1 day ago

Why do you think all the generals and admirals have been called to DC next week?

[–] maxxadrenaline@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

Dear lord please Kirk this duck

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

If Chuck Schumer blinks, he loses the right to ever say "TACO Trump" again.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shutdown will just be used as an excuse to permanently eliminate programs.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

That's what Schumer said last time. Spoiler: he did the layoffs anyway.

[–] FancyPantsFIRE@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Mass layoffs across the federal government, you say? Was that supposed to be good or bad?

[–] Ironfist79@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The cognitive dissonance is almost unbearable. I thought conservatives hated the government? Shouldn't they be celebrating a shutdown? They are literally getting what they want.

But muh free money pipe :(((

[–] blave@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump is using more layoffs during the shutdown as a threat to get rid of employees that don’t “align with his political agenda“.

But this isn’t much of a threat to the Democrats, especially because they all know he’s gonna do some bullshit like that anyway, and appeasing him now will just embolden him.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Yeah, he's already played the mass RIF hand. He's going to try to make it happen with/without a shutdown.

Also, anyone slightly aware of things knows a shutdown doesn't cause mass layoffs, that's all Republicans.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 day ago

It's like they haven't been doing that with doge this whole time

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Clathrate_Gun@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

It could cause “mass layoffs across the federal government.”

Oh yeah he wants this bad. It’s a fast track to getting what he wants. Doge not necessary.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago

duh its 100% trump and maga including the majority in the legislature. Big beautiful butfuck bill.

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I dont think anyone will beleive that they are worthy of blame. Dems can barely accomplish anything even when they are in power. Painting them as a powerful boogieman enemy now is not going to work.

Welcome to fascism? This is how the game is played: simultaneously powerless and powerful, cowardly and overwhelming.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

he thinks they will blink because Shumer told him if they don’t talk about it before hand he would start crying.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you know how many salaries we could cut if I just get rid of the legislative branch? -Trump very soon lol

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

ok? not sure what you are getting at.

my point being that the democrats are either spineless, or complicit. that chuck recently went on tv. The reporter, who was only desperately trying to get him to show spine and use leverage against republicans, ultimately failed in the most pathetic whimpering since shumers “nasty” letter pointing at trumps low numbers when democrats were even lower.

what a fucking joke.

load more comments
view more: next ›