this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2025
713 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

75963 readers
3602 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] QuantumTickle@lemmy.zip 182 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'll give you a hint, the company behind the bots rhymes with Gracker Ferrel.

[–] Macchi_the_Slime@piefed.blahaj.zone 26 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Nah, Cracker Barrel almost certainly wanted the redesign because that particular sector has been moving trying to avoid the whole "You can tell this used to be a Pizza Hut," thing for a while.

They want to be able to just open up a store anywhere with minimal investment. Then if their store is super generic it's real easy to offload the real estate if that location doesn't work out. It's easier for another firm to buy the real estate if they don't have to spend a bunch of money making the former Cracker Barrel not look like a Cracker Barrel.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 168 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The entire modern "conservative movement" is completely astroturfed. It's all funded and sponsored by the elites, in order to convince people to reject policies intended to improve their own lives, in favor of policies that exclusively benefit the elites.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 64 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's almost as if someone figured out that conservatives, in an effort to feel the need to play the victim, will react negatively and thus be more engaged when presented with non-conforming news.

A sort of dissonance.....that happens cognitively.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Conservatives love playing the victim.

Trans women existing = an attack on all women existing

Not being allowed to pressure children into praying at school = being denied religious freedom

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] turkalino@lemmy.yachts 129 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Nah pretty much everyone was in agreement that the new logo was worse, what do you me-

a sample of 52,000 posts made on X

Ah yes, the defunct site that is mostly bots so that Muskrat can continue to earn ad revenue NaziBucks

similar conversations were happening on the alt-tech platforms like Donald Trump’s Truth Social, Twitter knock-offs Gettr and Gab

Ah yes, the sites that use amplification bots to keep their users riled up and strengthen the echo chamber

[–] bigfondue@lemmy.world 46 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yea a lot of people didn't like the new bland logo, but conservatives were going on about how it's an attack on their culture and heritage. To go that far about a truck stop restaurant was not an organic happening. This is why it doesn't matter that Charlie Kirk was shot. If it wasn't that, the outrage machine would have turned to something else.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I thought it was a stupid and pointless business move or potentially a publicity stunt. And I’ll admit I’d be slightly bummed to walk into Cracker Barrel sit down and not see the peg game or all the weird old country store bullshit because nostalgias a bitch. But like it’s not even good southern cooking, the only things good there were fried chicken livers and breakfast food. The former can be found in any southern town with much higher quality and Waffle House exists and is generally really close to most Cracker Barrel’s for the latter.

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Cracker Barrel was usually cleaner than Waffle House, though, if that’s important to you while on road trips

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

Nah pretty much everyone was in agreement that the new logo was worse, what do you me-

Right? I'm definitely not right wing in any way shape or form, but I enjoy Cracker Barrel and the atmosphere once in a while. The logo doesn't need to be updated to the bland bullshit modern marketers want to force just so they can make millions in bullshit consulting fees. There is no way in hell the new logo was better than the old one to represent the company, but someone got paid a ton of money to convince them that it was a good decision clearly without any market research to back it up. A blind idiot could tell that logo was a worse choice objectively without any politics involved.

Were there bots? Oh, for sure. But they weren't the reason for the backlash, the shit decision was the reason it was a thing at all.

[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 28 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I still suspect the entire thing was a marketing ploy. That they had no intention of ACTUALLY changing the logo. They just wanted people to push back so they could get in the news. I wouldn’t be surprised if the marketing firm that made the logo also started the backlash.

I suspect the same is true about American Eagle’s Sydney Sweeney ad.

[–] other_cat@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 weeks ago

Didn't IHOP do something similar by claiming that they were going to change their name to IHOB?

"IHOb also issued a press release about the change and still used the original "IHOP" in its footer, suggesting the switch was a temporary promotion."

Seems so. Source.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

That is entirely possible. Make a shitty logo you never intend to actually use widely and use the backlash as basically free publicity.

It makes sense, and fits with modern society's social media dynamics.

But I refuse to give the marketing fucks that sort of recognition. It's more likely they just fucked up because they get paid either way and simple logos are the hot trend right now, and the corporate suits went with the marketing consultants blindly, as most of them usually do.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I suspect the same is true about American Eagle’s Sydney Sweeney ad.

What the fuck...

Wikipedia reference

I didn't even know this was a thing...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 52 points 2 weeks ago

Most right-wing outrage has been driven by bots for a decade. Yeah, what’s new?

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Here, Gizmodo. Let me fix that title for you.

"Almost half the upset tweets on the most bottidden platform (twitter) about Cracker Barrel were likely from bots."

Realistically, the upset was probably more about how the new logo came on all of a sudden, was very plain, and like how coca cola found out with new coke in the 1980s, it's not necessarily that people love cracker barrel. It's a part of their nostalgia they grew up with. They went with Grandma and Grandpa growing up. It was a special little stop on a family vacation to eat. They liked looking at the toys and candy in the gift shop and it was so weird and cool they had a store in the restaurant. It can be a company nightmare to screw with a logo that's been around for decades that could have memories attached to it.

Especially the new one is pretty lame.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Global_Liberty@lemmy.ml 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I like Cracker Barrel's four vegetarian sides plate. I can pick reasonably healthy options and the price isn't terrible. They are my preferred interstate-adjacent dining option on roadtrips. I'm even a loyalty member.

Yet I can't imagine spending one microsecond thinking about their logo let alone being stupid enough to be manipulated into having an opinion and then believing it relates to politics. Unless you are the majority shareholder, your view is utterly irrelevant. Shut up and either patronize the place or not.

There are a lot of people today on the right who cosplay as libertarians but somehow care deeply about the logo of a company they don't own.

Exactly.

I only go to Cracker Barrel on road trips and when they happen to be near where I plan to stop anyway. I don't go out of my way to go there, but I do prefer them over fast food joints.

Their new logo is stupid, mostly because it reminds me of Denny's. It doesn't change whether I'll go there, it only makes me think their logo is stupid when I do.

[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Imagine how much more successful any given business might be by simply.... ignoring Twitter.

[–] Hikermick@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

For all we know CB may have been behind the outrage

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

People need to remember that these themed businesses are taking huge risk by maintaining their identity. If a CB goes out of business they practically take a loss on the building because no one wants to buy an old timey restaurant. It’s too niche. Companies are going to bland and grey so the properties are easier to sell. It was never about woke and everything to do with money as usual.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] salty_chief@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Who had money on Cracker Barrel faking outrage about a plan that wasn’t to be?

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They were also inconveniently experiencing significant negative feedback to their business decision to sell warmed up day old food as a standard operating procedure just before new of the logo drama erupted. If you thought cracker barrel was extremely mid before, it's apparently gone full Applebee's microwave kitchen bad lately.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 week ago

I wonder what percentage of posts containing the words “woke” or “DEI” are from bots, and what percentage of posts with those words are from liberals getting upset about a bot post.

[–] DreaddyMck@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

Peter Teil straight up told an audience that he will push ideas with tech.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

The point where I realized it was fake was when nobody was complaining about the font or going "Uhm, aktually it's 'typeface'!"

[–] Geodad@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Someone got offended that they took the cracker off the logo.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean they took the barrel off too. What is cracker barrel without a cracker and a barrel?

To be fair, the new logo is kind of barrel shaped. It's also Denny's shaped...

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 14 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Stir shit up, get people to declare sides. Or maybe for the lulz.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Making non-political things political means people aren't looking at other stuff that actually matters. People have a limited attention span, and a limited amount of time to look at things outside work and family. Fill that with bullshit that doesn't matter and they can't stay educated on actual current events.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

To distract us from the other bots.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Maybe this article was written by a bot to distract us from the bots talking about other bots. Maybe I'm a bot. Hmm...

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago

The culture war outrage keeps people from thinking about real problems. Instead, they're perpetually angry about shit that has literally zero impact on their lives.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] itztalal@lemmings.world 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

I love watching companies tear themselves apart trying to appeal to both sides of the aisle.

Eventually, they're just going to have to stop trying and pick a side. That's when the real fun begins.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] bluemellophone@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

The entire thing feels manufactured by design to get people talking about Cracker Barrel.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

A bunch of my friends thought the logo change was dumb, too.

A bit rude to call them bots. ;p

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 32 points 2 weeks ago

There's a difference between thinking the change is dumb, which is something that happens in an individual's own mind as a passing thought, and thinking you suddenly need to tell everyone about it, and have arguments about it, and seek validations of your passing thought about it in large communities of other people and turn it into a national discussion. Bots are why everyone started talking about it, and that made people feel like they needed to tell everyone else what they thought about it too.

People were simply not losing any sleep over this (and never would have) until bots made it go viral. Some people might have legitimately formed such a thought without any significant outside influence, but it would have been an empty, meaningless, inconsequential thought, like thousands of others that likely go through everyone's brain in any given day to be summarily dismissed and promptly forgotten.

The point the article is raising is that the attention economy has now weaponized such insignificant thoughts, and can exploit them into controlling people's behavior, and thus, create actual real world consequences, the same way a hacker exploits access into a home computer to turn it into a botnet that they can orchestrate to perform actual attacks. It may not do any particular harm to the individual who has been motivated in this way, but it can do catastrophic damage to the targets of their collective wrath, scorn, and ridicule. Sticks and stones may break your bones, but words might destroy civilization.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BootLoop@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago

cracker bargle

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

I hadn't heard of the change, nor the outraged bot army.

How about those Epstein files?

[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Culture war keeps the rubes fighting the wrong people so that the real villains can keep robbing them.

[–] m3t00@piefed.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

tl;ds looked like a bot got hold of it

load more comments
view more: next ›