this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2025
475 points (97.0% liked)

News

32530 readers
3351 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Elon Musk has finally addressed reports that his name is included in a newly released batch of Epstein files.

Sharing a story from U.K. outlet Sky News, which ran with the simple headline “Elon Musk and Prince Andrew Named in the Latest Epstein Files Release,” the Tesla CEO fired off an enraged tweet.

“Shame on Sky News for this utterly misleading headline,” Musk wrote. “Anyone pushing this false narrative deserves complete contempt.”

“Epstein tried to get me to go to his island and I REFUSED,” Musk continued, “yet they name me even before Prince Andrew, who did visit.”

The “false narrative” in question is presumably Sky’s decision to float Musk’s name ahead of Andrew’s; the Daily Beast has reached out to Musk’s representatives for further clarification.

Musk’s name does indeed appear in the latest batch of documents released by Democrats on the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

“Reminder: Elon Musk to island Dec. 6 (is this still happening?)” reads a note found in a 2014 diary of the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The revelation comes from a fresh haul of previously unreleased material pertaining to the Epstein investigation, which has continued to dog the Trump administration.

Musk has previously said that he was invited to Epstein’s compound on Little St. James in the Virgin Islands several times, but claims he turned down the offers.

In a statement to Vanity Fair in 2019, just days after Epstein was arrested on federal sex trafficking charges, Musk confirmed that he had visited the disgraced financier’s Manhattan townhouse for about 30 minutes several years previously, but that “Epstein is obviously a creep.” He added, “He tried repeatedly to get me to visit his island. I declined.”

In an interview with the Department of Justice in August, British socialite and longtime Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence for sex trafficking, said she first met Musk in 2010 or 2011, during a multi-day stay on a Caribbean island for Google co-founder Sergey Brin’s birthday.

She also said she later saw Musk at an Oscars event, seemingly referring to a Vanity Fair Oscars party on March 2, 2014, where she and Musk were photographed together. The aspiring trillionaire has previously explained that image by saying he did not know Maxwell and that she had “photobombed” him.

Maxwell did not have any knowledge of a deeper relationship between Epstein and Musk, but believed emails between the two men were uncovered during discovery.

In June, Musk, the former head of the Department of Government Efficiency, fell out with his buddy President Donald Trump in spectacular fashion. At the height of their spat, Musk wrote in a now-deleted tweet that Trump “is in the Epstein files.” He has since retracted the statement and apologized, saying that he “went too far.”

Others named in the latest round of Epstein file disclosures include Musk’s former colleague and right-wing billionaire, Peter Thiel, and Trump’s former chief strategist, Steve Bannon.

Further documents are expected to be released as Congress prepares to vote on a bipartisan bill that would require full disclosure in the Epstein case.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (4 children)

He didn't go because they wouldn't let him impregnate all the girls there, since that's his only fetish.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Plenty of people weren't invited to Epstein's child rape island. Why did he think you would enjoy it there, Elon?

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I'm not a huge fan of this logic.

Epstein wanted an in with the rich and powerful. He collected big name contacts as trophies.

A fair question could be why he would have thought it safe to invite Musk, but just like with Weinstein, it seems a shit load of people knew and did nothing about it so it seems like he could generally assume the celebrities can be safely invited.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 57 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

She also said she later saw Musk at an Oscars event, seemingly referring to a Vanity Fair Oscars party on March 2, 2014, where she and Musk were photographed together. The aspiring trillionaire has previously explained that image by saying he did not know Maxwell and that she had “photobombed” him.

Didn't Epstein also have a framed photo of him in his apartment?

A Look Inside Jeffrey Epstein’s Manhattan Lair

Yes, he did

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] msmc101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

cuz he touches kids pretty simple

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 10 points 2 days ago

None of his kids talk to him anymore....

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

apple don’t fall from the tree

[–] Cassanderer@thelemmy.club 37 points 2 days ago (2 children)

How this blackmail of politicians and the ivy league business class both in America and in the UK was allowed to ensnare our own politicians with no pushback from our domestic intelligence services is a scandal. Whomever ran the CIA from when they started this until now should be in fucking prison at best for presumably helping to compromise our leaders for ill foreign policy outcomes.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You have to wonder whether they allowed it to happen because they thought it could be useful.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

And you have to wonder whether they were behind it

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Reminder that Robert Maxwell was a highly prized agent, to such an extent that when he “fell” off his yacht, the serving directors of all 6 major Israeli intelligence agencies attended his funeral.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

release all the files then. that will prove who is in the list because they touched kids or because they were approached by Epstein but refuses, but even then, if they know what happened, why did they kept it secret?

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago

Musk is a pedophile and no amount of lip service from him will convince me otherwise.

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 16 points 2 days ago
[–] mintiefresh@piefed.social 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Call me biased, but I'm definitely on the 'guilty until proven innocent' side of things when it comes to this.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That's the case with all of these people though. Like one of Epstein's victims said in an interview this past week, asking these men to go before a court of law and explain why they're in those files is not a "witch hunt."

‘Find it in your heart to seek the truth’: Epstein survivor pushes for lawmakers to release files

Letting them just skip doing the bare minimum though is insulting. You have money to blow on the most asinine bullshit. Hire yet another lawyer to come in and defend you. At least pretend to be held accountable for the victims sake. Given the way things are going, most likely, even if you're guilty you're still somehow innocent. Some people are just too big to fail because as always, some people count and some people don't.

[–] Octavio@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That’s probably not why.

[–] dis_honestfamiliar@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Wait... Then how would he know who visited. Says it without doubt.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›