this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2025
108 points (88.6% liked)

politics

26320 readers
3514 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 67 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

All the fascist Republicans crawling out from every creek there is. And dammit there's a lot of them.
But it is no wonder, because you've had to be a psychopath for decades to be a Republican, and from psychopath to fascist is not very far.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 49 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 13 points 3 weeks ago

Joker also pays he's taxes. Unlike real villians.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 54 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

They think AOC’s appeal is that she’s an attractive woman. So, of course, their chauvinistic response to put what they consider an attractive woman out against her.

I can’t tell if it’s just chauvinistic or also a calculated way to keep the conversation about AOC on her looks and away from her policies.

[–] Wigners_friend@piefed.social 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Even if it were true, Meg looks like a dehydrated horse these days.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 weeks ago

That's not fair to dehydrated horses.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

She could look like an infected foot and I’d still vote for the only progressive democrat.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 47 points 3 weeks ago

And that's literally her platform. To be a hater.

[–] Master167@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

One of these days, candidates are going to start running for office “for” something. I’m tired of voting against something.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Good news!

The current DNC agrees with you, here's him being asked about Mamdani months ago:

Ken Martin (current DNC chair):

Well, first, it was a brilliant campaign. And there's a lot of lessons.

One is, he campaigned for something. And this is a critical piece. We can't just be in a perpetual state of resisting Donald Trump. Of course, we have to resist Donald Trump. There's no doubt about it for all the reasons we just talked about. But we also have to give people a sense of what we're for, what the Democratic Party is fighting for, and what we would do if they put us back in power.

And that's really critical. And I think that's one of the lessons from Mamdani's campaign, is that he focused on affordability. He focused on a message that was resonant with voters, and he campaigned for something, not against other people or against other things. He campaigned on a vision of how he was going to make New York City a better place to live.

I think that's one of the lessons. The other lessons, of course, is the tactics he used to get his message out, both a very aggressive in-person campaigning, meeting voters where they're at, and then also in those digital spaces, using very creative messaging to cut through the noise and to get to voters in an inexpensive but authentic way.

There's a lot to learn from that campaign, and I'm excited to learn more.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/dnc-chair-on-the-path-to-winning-back-voters-and-lessons-democrats-can-learn-from-mamdani

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] oakey66@lemmy.world 32 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)
[–] makyo@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

She is a cancerous attention whore, perfect for today’s GOP

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

In retrospect, Sarah Palin wasn’t a terrible person but definitely a harbinger of things to come.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 weeks ago

Nah. Sarah Palin was a terrible person too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Is she sadistic enough to hold her own against the big beasts of the party, though? She may be a toxic narcissist, but this is the big league and the performative puppy-killers and AR15 family photo people couldn’t eat her for lunch if she doesn’t bring her game.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Member when NBC News was like "Let's hire her for millions - she's a serious journalist" and then when everything she did went to shit they were like "hmm. Ok lets' move her to Saturday afternoons . . "

Goddamned republiQan owned fuckwit corporate traitor idiots.

[–] MangioneDontMiss@feddit.nl 27 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

she would get fucking destroyed in fair election against AOC.

[–] thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

would she though? I can hear everyone from centre left to the far right now saying “I couldn’t vote for AOC she’s just too extreme, we don’t need those far left socialist ideas in our government.”

[–] TheMinister@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago

I have a friend—a big Bernie guy who talks about how he wouldve been great. He said to me the other day, “AOC can go fuck herself.” I asked why. He said, “she just doesn’t know what people want. She went too far left.”

Jesus Christ. He’s usually a pretty sound thinker. I have no idea what that is. Maybe just plain old misogyny.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 25 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Bet. Do it. I’d love to see this.

Presidential Nominee Kelly + Presidential Nominee Ocasio-Cortez = President Ocasio-Cortez.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I hope you're right, but we thought similar things about Trump since he came down that hideous golden staircase in 2015, and look where we are now

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Trump is a man. He doesn’t have sexism working against him.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Orange is the new white

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] daannii@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago

Republican women so clearly forgetting their party is misogynist

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

This bitch told Maher that trans was her #1 issue. How is that going to help anyone in America?

[–] klemptor@startrek.website 17 points 3 weeks ago

Please do go ahead and split the republican vote you fucking trash GOP sycophant.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Then she discovered how irrelevant she was and started screaming "Look at me!!!" even louder.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Basically that. Just another female MAGA head that gives credibility to "dumb blonde" jokes.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

Oh no, please, stop

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

Great!

The more crowded the republican primary the better.

trumps going to try and run again, or name a successor. A crowded field of republicans tearing each other down will only help Dems.

We can manage a cordial primary, they only know how to campaign by saying their opponent is the devil.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 7 points 3 weeks ago

We can manage a cordial primary

Yeah no. Dem primaries are only "cordial" if the progressive loses, otherwise the neolibs will take their ball and play with the fascists. See: Mamdani.

[–] muxika@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'd argue that they'd try to out-crazy one another and we'd end up with a psycho. Also, while we'll be cordial in comparison, there's still a lot of infighting on the Democratic side.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] RonniePickering@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

Hahahahahahhhhaaaahahahahaha

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 8 points 3 weeks ago

Oh you sweet summer child, Megyn Kelly. You actually believe Trumpie is just going to stop being President.

[–] spacemanspiffy@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Sure, do it

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

I hear she had blood coming out her . . wherever

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Her hubris astonishes me.

Does she not believe that her Dear Leader will rule over America forever?

And she thinks a woman could do a better job?

Are we sure she’s still a republican?

[–] Nagrom@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 weeks ago

One of these things is not like the other

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Who did the work on her jaw? That's fucking backalley chopshop level work there.

load more comments
view more: next ›