That’s possible but also quite possibly attributable to the constant erosion of our schools and drift in curriculum. The last decade has seen enormous reductions in education quality.
this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
466 points (93.1% liked)
News
36201 readers
4313 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Perhaps could compare similar data from countries that aren't destroying their school systems as effectively.
"The same decline appears outside the United States. Horvath told senators that across roughly 80 countries, academic performance drops after digital technology becomes widely embedded in classrooms. The timing alone raises serious questions about how learning environments affect cognitive development."
Doesn't say which 80 but 80 should be a broad swath
imo its the ipad parents and tik tok
maybe the microplastics get to all of us too. not like the older people took any tests
I was one of the last classes to graduate before everyone got school-issued laptops or tablets, back in 2015.
I'm kinda glad I didn't go to school or grow up doing everything on a computer. The retention and repetition just isn't there with me, or most others it seems. Like those typing courses in computer class that we did in elementary; I still type everything using my index fingers and almost nothing else.
But another part of me wishes I was more computer literate. All I really know how to do is plug stuff in and sign into my profile.
load more comments
(7 replies)
Because asshole politicians are cutting education spenditure everywhere. At least in Hungary, they're doing it because "we told you, the thinking machine came, now go to a trade school".
load more comments
(2 replies)
Presidency after presidency education has been getting cut while the war budget continue to grow.
load more comments
(7 replies)
Gen Z has managed something no modern generation pulled off before.
Whether it is true or not, i love how the article reflexively blames Gen Z. Like, did they invent Tiktok and brainrot? Did they ruin the school system? Did they put microplastics in the food and water?
Boomers invented Participation Trophies and then blamed Millennials for receiving them. I was a Millennial that would rather have failed then get one and the school system hated me for that
At the end of middle school, I got a participation trophy for the state science fair, which was a mandatory requirement for graduating 8th grade. It was the only "award" I got at the graduation superlatives assembly.
The kicker? I actually got an exception for the science fair because I missed 6 weeks of school while almost dying from MRSA pneumonia. This is my millennial villain origin story.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(14 replies)
I'm not sure why this article frames this outcome as the fault of Gen Z. It's not their fault their parents gave them iPads instead of spending time with them, nor for the chronically underfunded educational system.
Ironic. The article does not frame the outcome as the fault of Gen Z. It in fact goes to great lengths to point out that the fault almost certainly lies with how they were educated, and the parenting environment they were raised in.
I'll highlight the framed factors for you and where the blame gets pointed.
Horvath took the same message to Capitol Hill during a 2026 Senate hearing on screen time and children. His framing skipped the generational dunking and focused on exposure. “More than half of the time a teenager is awake, half of it is spent staring at a screen,” he told lawmakers. Human learning, he argued, depends on sustained attention and interaction with other people. Endless feeds and condensed content don’t offer either.
Schools leaned hard into technology during the same window. Educational software replaced textbooks, long readings, and extended problem-solving. After class, students returned to phones, tablets, and laptops, bouncing between social feeds and bite-sized explanations of material they never sat with for very long.
“I’m not anti-tech. I’m pro-rigor,” Horvath told the Post. Rigor, in his view, comes from friction. Reading full texts. Working through confusion. Spending time with material that doesn’t immediately reward you. Take that friction away, and cognitive skills dull. Brains adapt to the environment they’re given, and this one prizes speed over staying power.
The same decline appears outside the United States. Horvath told senators that across roughly 80 countries, academic performance drops after digital technology becomes widely embedded in classrooms. The timing alone raises serious questions about how learning environments affect cognitive development.
This conversation feels uncomfortable because it doesn’t offer villains or easy fixes. Horvath summed it up bluntly during his testimony. “A sad fact our generation has to face is this: Our kids are less cognitively capable than we were at their age.” His recommendation focused on restraint, dialing back screens in schools, and restoring depth before the next generation is doomed.
Most frustrating for me is not just that many people read this article and take away an emotive framing that is completely counter to the text of the article, but that many people on Lemmy that read this article will just memory-hole it and continue to complain about phone bans in school, and the under-16 social media bans going on around the world that are very likely to have significant positive benefits for children's learning and go some ways to resolving the problem.
I appreciate the effort you out into highlighting relevant sections 👍
Bans and laws like that might have good intentions, but realistically enforcement is either impossible, or the perfect tracking tool on a country or world wide scale...
Like discord requiring government IDs and face scans; Do you really trust companies & governments to do the right thing, or should we just learn to maybe socialize with our children more?
I understand your complaints entirely; something really should be done. I just hate that it takes government interference with crappy bans, instead of empowering parents with resources (not working 50+ hours a week to survive) and knowledge (hey maybe 14 hours of screentime isn't very pro-social).
Sidenote: that part about speed over staying power, I felt that myself. At least within the US, everything is always GOGOGO and cramming over real learning. Probably something with the time is money thing, but school and a lot of college felt like memorization over problem solving or skill building.
It doesn't have to be perfectly enforced to have a significant positive impact though. Just the signal-effect to parents is enormous. If social media is banned for kinds under 15 (or 16, or whatever), it becomes orders of magnitude easier for parents with 10-year olds to not get the their own smartphone, tablet, etc. It becomes a lot easier to not cave to pressure of disabling parental controls on the same units.
Basically, the only way a 7-12 year old is getting addicted to a smartphone is if their parents supply one and don't lock it down. When they do that, it's likely due to external pressure of the type "all the other kids have it", and they don't want their kid to be the socially awkward one that's left out. These kind of laws make it easier for parents to collectively agree to hold off on smartphones and social media.
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
people were saying this about millennials as well. in fact, James Flynn (for whom the Flynn effect is named) literally said that teenagers in 2009 were dumber than teenagers 30 years ago. call me when there's a consensus from neuroscientists about this. for that matter, call me when standardised testing is a useful measure of intelligence
Between no child left behind and watching classes that teach you about things in the real world (homec, interviews, taxes, etc.) disappearing a year before I was supposed to take them in that era? I can understand that by measure of capability as prior generations understand it we are falling behind each generation. That was just when we started losing momentum.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
This is directly tied to the No Child Left Behind Act passing 25 years ago. It's been a coordinated effort to dumb down the populace and make them less informed
I've heard of rural US homeschool kids entering their teens who can't read or write.
load more comments
(5 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Gen Z has a lot of shit stacked against them. I'm glad the article doesn't go "blaming" Gen Z for "being dumber", but instead is focusing on the fact it's a parenting failure. COVID era learning difficulties, constantly being bombarded with tech designed to suck out their soul, AI being everywhere for their college age life, etc.
As a Millennial, I've seen the blame game. I only hope we come out of this spiral as a society.
load more comments
(1 replies)
As a millenial who went through the shite by the media about how much of a snowflake we are by getting offended with everything, frivolous for ordering avocado toasts for breakfasts, and clueless and unequipped when it comes to working, I ask: "who raised us?" I remember the parents' moral panic on videogames and cartoons in the 1990s and 2000s. Many kids of my generation weren't let out because the boomer and Gen X parents were made afraid by the constant news cycle of serial killers and high crime rate. And they wonder why we're so sheltered? Now, the media run by older generations are taking potshots at Gen Z claiming they are dumber. Even if that is the case, who are the ones who raised Gen Z to be constantly glued to the phone screen and watching brain rotting contents that led to lower IQ?
The next time the media complains such and such generation is behaving a certain way or being dumb, even if scientific study says so, ask yourself, who are raising these kids?
load more comments
(4 replies)
sigh. every generation has this article. and even if it was true the failure would still be at the previous generations, because kids can't be blamed for the school system we decide for them or a society thats so anti family that parents barely have time to give attention to their kids.
don't worry gen z: they told the same stuff about us etc. blame generations so we don't see that the real unfairness always was and still is the distribution of wealth.
Every generation literally doesn't is the point? I do think the framing is bad, but the generational decrease, as a cohort, in attention spans, technical literacy, and skills competency has been a major worry for over a decade now. Computer science educators were sounding the alarm on this in the mid and late teens, for example.
Elementary school teachers right now are sounding the alarms over Gen Alpha too. It's catastrophically bad. The education system isn't just flawed or broken, it's actively fucking collapsing. There are a shocking amount of kids now that literally can't read. At all.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
The point has some validity - the presence of an easy solution allows us to avoid internalizing our lessons.
The same was said about my generation (Millenials) because we were allowed to use a calculator. And quite frankly, it’s true - I am less capable of mental calculation than my boomer parents. Now that I have kids I have forced myself to do more in my head or on paper to set an example, and I have improved.
It’s not that their neurons are inferior or that they cannot learn. It’s that it isn’t worth bothering to remember facts or formulae when every little bit of information is a click away.
load more comments
(2 replies)
and darkness...
The dumbing down of American is most evident in the slow decay of substantive content in the enormously influential media, the 30 second sound bites (now down to 10 seconds or less), lowest common denominator programming, credulous presentations on pseudoscience and superstition, but especially a kind of celebration of ignorance”
Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark
load more comments
(1 replies)
I might be wrong but I think this might be more of a failing of the US education system than an across the board decline world wide. Although I do think millenials but much more so Gen Z and Alpha are adversly affected by social media than the generations before by tv.
Ah I see it's time for our weekly "You're miserable because of group-X" rage bait stupid fucking headlines.
I am far more concerned about our adults' screen time, the people who are supposed to be running our goddamn fucking country are spending all their time scrolling and tweeting for attention and posting rage-bait and getting in trouble for irresponsible internet usage.
At least the kids growing up on the internet right now will have some kind of perspective and understanding how the shit works.
I mean, we still need to do something about algorithmic amplification of our worst feelings and impulses driving waves of insecure people into the arms of grifters and crumbling society broadly, but I want to BAN ADULTS FROM THE INTERNET FIRST.
load more comments
(5 replies)
Awww, but I loved seeing headlines how I, personally, as a millennial, am killing industries. I miss those days. ;_;
Yay! We did it!
Don't worry kids, parent are busy and corporations need money. Just watch some more Jake Paul on Youtube and don't think about it. Or anything else for that matter.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I wonder if just a larger percentage of Gen Z thinks standardized testing is bullshit and don't even try. I mean, don't get me wrong, I strongly believe the internet has been a greater evil than benefit to the world, and also believe cell phones have done serious damage to attention spans and focus. That is to say, I'm firmly at the "get off my lawn you damn kids" stage of life. But at the same time I admire so much of the younger generations that don't buy into the "work hard and it pays off" bullshit that I was raised with.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Republican policies are working! This is a US centric phenomena, right? Not something happening in china?
I would also say this is what happens when public transit is largely unfunded
load more comments
(2 replies)
told the New York Post
Vice (which is right wing trash these days), quoting an interview with the NYPost. Mmmm. Credible.
These young people think that being conservative is forward looking and rebellious...they're so so wrong. Sadly they'll be the ones creating the policies for the foreseeable future, and their dumb choices will hunt those of us that still have a quite a bit of time in planet earth. Idiocracy wasn't a movie but a documentary.
load more comments
(1 replies)
That's not an accident.
That's government policy.
"Omg! I gave my kid an Ipad as soon as he was able to hold it in his hands so it would do my job as a parent and now my kid is dumb?! How did this happen?!
Wait, and you also tell me that me voting for assholes that wanted to destroy the education system is also to blame?!
I can't believe I'm the one responsible for this!"
I'm sorry, did this study include baby boomers? Idiots destroyed the world in less than a lifetime.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Idiocracy rise
Idiocracy is well on its way.
2028!
A leader who genuinely cares about their people, takes action, and relies on capable experts for advice? Gets my vote.
If its screens it should be effecting all the generations but at a certain point you stop taking standardized tests. Would be interesting for a societ if they kept on having them and you could see how cognitive decline worked.
load more comments
(2 replies)
view more: next ›